RE: Tearing a man down (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


WulfMan -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/5/2005 1:58:05 PM)

wow they must be pretty damned good if Canada is letting them train in Canada's two whole planes. LOL I'm sorry but I have to. I just can't resist.




Jasmyn -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 6:44:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mantis65

Here’s something I am torn on …..
I don’t except people to agree whether its good or bad just want to see how Dommes and subs feel about this?
Some of my Woman friends are Female Supremacists that feel men are inferior to themselves. They never have had much of a conflict with me since they know I am submissive I guess they figure I know my place.

Anyway my thought was about something LadyAngelika said. I couldn’t find her exact quote but it’s similar to:

Some woman need to make the male sub feel inferior so they can feel superior to them.

Ands something LadyTantalize said has been haunting me:

I've seen. A type of "institutionalizing" occurs in which the sub becomes either infantile, robotic or zombie-like from being constantly "dehumanized or and devalued.

The drone like dependency sounds sexy to me on a twisted fantasy level but I know I would never want to experience this level of submission in real life.

Anyway I love the idea of humiliation and being reduced in status.
I myself feel I for some reason a need to be reduced in status somewhat.

So heres my question how much of the slaves/ subs self estem do you damage if at all? and how far is too far to go with tearing down his self image?
mantis



IMO, too far would be if they (the sub) felt or displayed feelings or behaviours common in domestic abuse victims. Where the sub is grossly unhappy and not feeling good about themselves as a person outside and in the d/s relationship. A feeling of worthlessness and devaluation. I tend not to abide by the notion that there is no wrong way or right way of doing things, that each couple are free to set their own boundaries and relationship dynamics...because if something is pyschologically damaging, no amount of d/s or kink labels are going to make it acceptable (to Me), (and that works both ways, for subs creating situations of psychological abuse upon their dominants too).

But to answer your questions in context, I will go as far as I need to go in any given situation, d/s or otherwise whereby I maintain My self respect (as defined by Me) but also get to succinctly make My point. It takes some doing to push My buttons, but if a boy deserves My wrath he is well and truly going to get it and if it makes him feel bad then so be it, I'm only telling him it for his own good. But to call him a farken idiot everytime he spills some milk or trips over his shoes ain't My style. I don't want to erode the self esteem, I want to mold what self esteem there is into something more.

So I tend not to think in terms of 'stripping' self esteem...rather managing the 'ego'...and if the 'ego' is getting in the way of the 'submissive' then the 'ego' needs to 'go' bye byes.

In scenes as well I will do what is necessary to bring about the desired result...if he wants to be kicked in the nuts while I tell him he's a worthless pig then so be it, thats exactly what will happen. If after I sense he has issues with what he desires, guilt, confusion, etc, then I will allay his fears where possible, but ultimately it is going to be up to him to integrate his desires with himself and who he is when he begs to be degraded, craving it. I mean seriously, how farked is that? A grown man wanting to be kicked in the balls? And if that floats someone's boat, they're going to have some self doubt for sure...but god bless each and everyone of them who do ;)

Jasmyn




Oumae -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 8:31:23 AM)

I dont see it as breaking someone, I like strong subs with confidence... I see it more as breaking down walls that are erected to hide behind. Without these walls the sub has more freedom to feel and explore their submission, to follow and explore without the weight of worrying what others think.

Oumae




LadyAngelika -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 11:14:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WulfMan

wow they must be pretty damned good if Canada is letting them train in Canada's two whole planes. LOL I'm sorry but I have to. I just can't resist.


Yeah... and I can't resist sharing some of my sadistic secrets with Amanda the next time I chat with her ;)

- LA




mantis65 -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 11:19:15 AM)

quote:

I tend not to abide by the notion that there is no wrong way or right way of doing things, that each couple are free to set their own boundaries and relationship dynamics...because if something is pyschologically damaging, no amount of d/s or kink labels are going to make it acceptable (to Me),


I wouldn’t want to live in a miserable state of abuse myself.
No matter what the conditions were I would want to be happy.
thanks for your input here Jasmyn
mantis





GentleLady -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 10:11:41 PM)

LadyAngelika

When did We buy the second plane ??




WulfMan -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 10:15:33 PM)

In response to Miss LA, I already know I'm screwed lol. Might as well have a chuckle, until Amanda gets back from the Cities[:D]. And to Miss GL, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhAHAHAHAHA! TOO funny, see like I said Canada military=guys on horses with slingshots.
*Laughing, but knowing he is gonna get it later*




GingerleeDREAD -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/6/2005 11:37:14 PM)

quote:

tearing a man down

This is a desired and expressed need
of many men both of Dominance as
well as submissive and slave men.
This is a kink that not many Woman
however are trained or able to fullfill
because it is such a turn off for most
Woman in seeing a Man in this state.
But then there are Us
Humiliating Sadists.....JMPO




LadyAngelika -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/8/2005 1:18:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GentleLady
LadyAngelika
When did We buy the second plane ??



No clue. This Dayton boy seems to be talking out of his ass. ;) Perhaps something should be done about that!

quote:

ORIGINAL: WulfMan

In response to Miss LA, I already know I'm screwed lol. Might as well have a chuckle, until Amanda gets back from the Cities[:D]. And to Miss GL, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhAHAHAHAHA! TOO funny, see like I said Canada military=guys on horses with slingshots.
*Laughing, but knowing he is gonna get it later*


You have no idea what I can do with a slingshot boy!

- LA




MistressFire70 -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/8/2005 1:24:18 PM)

I think the words "inferior" or "reduced in status" have a negative connotation. How about the term "secondary" instead? you are secondary to Me, the Master (or Mistress or whatever). Being secondary doesn't mean you give up who you are or your identity; instead is merely tell us your chosen role within the relationship. But then again, to me, the word "slave" works just as well.

Fire






mantis65 -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/8/2005 2:56:56 PM)

quote:

I think the words "inferior" or "reduced in status" have a negative connotation. How about the term "secondary" instead? you are secondary to Me, the Master (or Mistress or whatever). Being secondary doesn't mean you give up who you are or your identity; instead is merely tell us your chosen role within the relationship. But then again, to me, the word "slave" works just as well.


i like your idea MistressFire70 it still lets the slave feel they are lower with out feeling worthless.




MistressRage -> RE: Tearing a man down (3/8/2005 6:28:28 PM)

I always thought it best to build a sub back up after tearing them down.
Humiliation can be used to break the ego and any preconceived notions of the interpersonal workings of the relationship will go, then once broken suggestion and training can be given to make the slave into one fine being.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875