LotusSong -> RE: Homo want Hetero? (1/29/2007 8:17:51 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: reamer Why can't the term breeder merely be looked at as "funny"? I AM a breeder, though I'll never breed. Words should not carry the same weight as behaviour towards another person, in my opinion. If someone calls me a breeder, but I'm the person they ask to write and speak the poetic dedication to their queer marriage, and another person says "that's a bad word" but they'd not even invite me to their queer marriage even if we've been "friends" for years, where does the real respect lie? and the real disrespect? I may have decided to never be maried and never breed, but if I ever did? \ and I wanted a "best man" who UNDERSTOOD what good love and good sex and good relationship means to speak for me, I wanted that man to be my best friend in all the world whom I was honored by, when he chose to come out to me first? and everyone else had a problem with that? I would dump everyone else for that wedding, and have only HIM and my bride (not that such will happen) there, aside from my family that also love him and appreciate him. HIM over anyone that sees politics and sex/love as intertwined. With the man he considers his Wife right there too, singing the aria, rather than someone whom loked at "preferrence" over BEHAVIOUR. Over friendship, over platonic love, rather than "what flag do we waste our time marching under". as a footnote, dcnovice, thank you for referring to me as darling. that means more to be coming from a good queer man than being called "hottie" does from a woman, no joke, no hyperbole. I am glad this thread began. Well, in that attitude.. what if I think the word faggot is funny. Nope, one guy utters it and he's delegated to therapy for "sensitivity training". How about we just stop the names all together..no more bitch, fag, breeder, beaner,slut.. yadda yadda OOhhh.. but then we would have to grow up...never mind.
|
|
|
|