BRNaughtyAngel -> RE: Skinny chicks (2/2/2007 12:05:04 PM)
|
I haven't read every post on the subject, but one thing I've noticed not just here, but in regards to "weight", especially when one is dieting. I'm 5'10" in my bare feet. I let the weight creep up on me over the years, but two years ago, I started the Atkins diet (low carbing), eating healthier and was working out with a personal trainer 3 days a week, and doing cardio 5 days a week. In 6 months, I lost 45lbs according to the scale and went from a size 20 to a size 12. I weighed 186lbs at that point in time. I looked damned good, toned and tight, but still wanting to get rid of some more padding. The interesting thing is that when I was younger, I distinctly remember a point where I wore a size 12 and weighed 155lbs. The difference being that my 186lbs size 12 included a lot of muscle, built up through consistent exercise, whereas my 155lbs size 12 was lacking muscle and being toned. Muscle weighs more than fat, but takes up less space in the body. I have gained a few of my pounds back and lost some of my muscle tone due to poor food choices and stopping exercising. I'm in a size 14. I'm now back in that regimen, although I don't work out with a trainer, I work out at home and use my ellipitcal trainer for my cardio. In the end, I don't care what the scale says, I care about what I see and how I feel. I remember reading somewhere that Lucy Lawless of Zena Warrior Princess fame, weighed in at 160lbs and I doubt anyone would have considered her fat It's not about the number on the scale, it's your body makeup that counts. Many bodybuilders are considered overweight according to BMI charts, but they aren't covered in fat, they're loaded up with muscles. One thing I do know is the scale is evil and shouldn't be used as the judge when you are working to lose weight. Take measurements when you start and every few weeks or so. That's how you chart your real progress. [:)]
|
|
|
|