|
TreSwank -> All-Male Utopia (The Longest Post Ever) (2/7/2007 5:39:33 PM)
|
Back in the old days, before any of us were even wee-little chromosome-armed gametes, flagellating our merry way down Big Mama's birth canal, Jesus of Nazareth was sent out on a mission, to gather up twelve nice, well-mannered, Jewboys for a crash course in spiritual development
Now, Jesus (a.k.a-Lord and Savior of the Universe) - he wasn't exactly the epitome of alpha-male, out-to-stud, Chippendale's virility. You see, the Jeezmeister - the Big J - if you will so kindly allow, didn't care much for the vain, prideful things that horny boys like to do to impress girls. The "mark of pride" in men.........well............that little taint on the soul of mankind was most apparent when guys were acting all barrel-chested around the womenfolk. As a matter of fact, Christ seemed to like male company a whole lot more than the alternative.
Ladies and Gents of the Peanut Gllery - I'd like to throw a quick thought out there for you to toss around in the ol' grey matter. Regurgitate it if you like, or let it sink in a little. Either way, we're probably gonna have some fun debating the matter.
If any of you have ever read "The S.C.U.M Manifesto" by the late Valerie Solanas, you're gonna find a happy avalanche of bitter vitriol, aimed straight at every dick-wielding denizen of God's green earth. To make an uber-long-post a little bit shorter and more appealing to the average internet-perusing, attention-retarded reader, I'll summarize the Manifesto by telling you that it advocated an all-pussy coup, followed by the creation of an all-female society, for the distinct purpose of ridding planet Earth of it's "man-created" ills. According to the gal who gunned down everyone's favorite, lisping, pop-culture sweetheart (Andy Warhol), men were culpable for society's ills because males were dirty, abject dogs at heart, willing to sacrifice damn near anything for some good ol' poon-tang. Why a hater of patriarchy would want to shoot a flamboyantly gay artist is kind of lost on Yours Truly.
Jesus Christ.....whose opinion supersedes that of Solanas, by divine default loved men more than any woman could ever comprehend - and accordingly, he was pretty savvy of the sensual draws of "whore-dom".
If you look at the uncouth impetus that drives most men to desire success more than spiritual perfection and brotherly love, it all boils down to an upgrade in the quality of snatch. Most women tend to seek out men with worldly success because of an upgrade in social status. Women like nice things.........MATERIAL THINGS: furs, jewelry, styling products, cars...............and men who possess those fat wallets usually have a field day in the reproductive frenzy. Even those gals who opt for the poorly spoken, socio-economically depressed "chocolate" variety of man, want aggression, and other spiritually undesirable traits present in their mates, just for the sake of feeling "protected." It seems like Jesus' wants and needs are in stark contrast to those of the feminine variety.
Say, for instance, that the "status-seeking" element was removed, and the world was populated by nothing but swinging cocks (inverse of the Solanas situation). Now, without the incentive to procreate......to impress a made-up, meretricious, lipgloss sporting, greedy piece of ass........men would have nothing to occupy their minds but survival, and the cultivation of virtue. Without the histrionic, visceral natures of the feminine gender, men could create a classless utopia, free from the false "mark of pride", which the presence of women has imposed on every, earnest, sincere-heart fella. Put pussy-hungry men in prison, and they'll naturally rape each other in the ass to simulate hetero-sexual intercourse, in order to mimic the faux dominant positions that they've been continuously forced to occupy by women. Now, if you place guys who have renounced materiality and base hungers in a communal living situation, such as a monastary, the table does a complete turnaround, and, as I stated early, they will dedicate themselves to the pursuit of virtue and spiritual perfection.
This is a hypothetical situation, mind you, and I'm not too worried about the question of reproduction in a society sans one gender.
|
|
|
|
