FrankAr -> RE: Owner vs Master (2/10/2007 10:48:34 AM)
|
Greetings far, I, personally, see Master being around as they have both subs and slaves. Subs can have a Master, but not be owned. Yes, I know, they have that steel around their neck, and some don't even wear it, and they use the term of Master to the one they have the steel from. Owner has another level of the D/s dynamics. Having a Master as a sub, you would still have the safety net, the ability to have a mind and being able to walk away from a relationship. As being owned, well that is another kettle of fish. Being owned, you become a slave. Now I know we all live in a society of thoughtful thinking adults and we all have minds and voices, but being owned you reliquish these rights. Now some of you might be rolling the eyes and saying, we live in this day and not the 16th century. Ok, now close your eyes and think really well about it. As a slave you CAN relinquish all your rights, and your maturity and thought and experience, will lead you to PICK the right owner. No one forces you to pick someone and then re-think after 6 months and want out. Your maturity shines out with the length and duration of the relationship. I have spoken with some slaves that have been with their owners for 10 years or so, because they picked well before they got the steel around the neck. You can still be owned and have a job, thought, fun and more, if you bounce off the owner. If you both fit your own bill in life, so be it, you will be with each other for years to come. There is no real text book in life for the titles, this is just my opinion, and I can only give my opinion through my eyes and through my life. Just like the difference between Doms/ Masters and subs / slaves and Masters / Owners and collars / uncollared. You read what you want into your life. From what you have written about the length and type of relationship, YOU picked poorly, simple. Be well. Frank Ar.
|
|
|
|