RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


sub4hire -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 2:00:29 PM)

quote:

Bras don't support breasts or stop them from sagging more. They simply keep them from moving around a lot


I didn't bother to read beyond the first paragraph when I replied. It is clear someone is lying.

However since perverse mentioned it...the above statement is also a contradiction.

Support is keeping them from moving around.

via dictionary.com
sup·port ( P ) Pronunciation Key (s-pôrt, -prt)
tr.v. sup·port·ed, sup·port·ing, sup·ports
To bear the weight of, especially from below.
To hold in position so as to keep from falling, sinking, or slipping.




FelinePersuasion -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 5:56:00 PM)

I've been in bra's since 4th grade I am 22 now. Someone who says bra's don't support them has obviously either A never worn one, B worn the wrong one Or C is talking out their ass.


Alsio I'd be carefull of any one who'd demand you drink their urine, I'm not sure any dr's would recommend urine consumption.




sub4hire -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 6:21:16 PM)

I vote for C




mnottertail -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 6:50:57 PM)

there was a great thread on here about urine and I couldn't find it to save anything. But it contained fairly scientific data, that said while ingesting urine is not without risk it is fairly sterile............about like copping STD's ........if you know where its been............(I MEAN TRUELY) you probably ain't that bad off. ASIDE: Cello and MrKite I know you are ROTFL. I believe MercnBeth posted on it as well as SFRGRRL (did I get that right, Steph?) but being such prolific posters they may not remember it either........in any case in the civil war it was cooked for potassium to save lives..........now I ain't advocating a damn thing here ladies and gentlemen, but you can stab yourself in the tonsils with a fork while eating..............so that by some definitions I have been hit with will not make it SSC, so I vote RACK...................

Additionally, remember flames can burn and by definition are not SSC..........
LOL...........
Flame on!!!!!!!!!!!

Ron




sub4hire -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 7:41:59 PM)

quote:

if you know where its been............(I MEAN TRUELY) you probably ain't that bad off.


Correct and many studies showed it can actually cure you. As long as it is your own.

Now I'm no urine aficionado by any means. However, I also remember if you drink too much urine you will have serious issues. A thread here on the board's a while back.
The life span of your sub...diminishes rapidly..something like that.




mnottertail -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 7:58:40 PM)

Dear Sub4,

I don't mean to hijack this thread but I would love to see the control group for that study, as well as the imbibers........

I am just tickled about that.

Ron




cellogrrlMK -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 8:11:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

ASIDE: Cello and MrKite I know you are ROTFL.


I'm ROTFL harder than MrKite is Ron... you and I have shared more of that private joke!

LOLOLOL

Alles klar, in Ordnung [;)]

cello




mnottertail -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/1/2005 8:29:27 PM)

Ja, ich weise dies jetz........Ich bien die GroBs und mishtegas shirtzenjaeger..........oder?

Ganz Genug; Gndadergefrau,

Mich




proudsub -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/2/2005 12:41:31 AM)

quote:

there was a great thread on here about urine and I couldn't find it to save anything.


Proud to the rescue[;)]:

consumption of urine




Mercnbeth -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/2/2005 8:45:51 AM)

quote:

Bras don't support breasts or stop them from sagging more.


For women with large breasts, it is a matter of comfort--try walking around all day with two free swinging twenty pound football shaped weights hanging from your chest--as well as aesthetics--breasts are confined to an area closer to the armpits than the belly-button and nipples can be arranged to face forward instead of pointing down at the ground, also the amount of cleavage and breast size can be manipulated. However, our modern version of a bra was originally designed to flatten the breasts into a mono-bosom--- the fashion of the day was straight lines, and society couldn't bear to even think about breasts, much less see them defined under clothing.

"Society's concept of the "ideal" breasts are breasts that would remain in their firm, uplifted attitude, on their own, for our entire lives. Advertising and messages in today's media have done a good job of convincing us of that myth, and the myth that breasts will sag unless we "properly support" them. The point to remember is that they will assume a more relaxed, adult position whether they are supported OR NOT! Some breasts never seem to reach that lower, relaxed position, even into a woman's sixth decade of life. This phenomenon is not a result of constant bra usage. Bras will not prevent that from happening."
http://www.breastnotes.com/aware/aware-bra.shtml

There are quite a few studies that have been done and are underway that are linking the wearing of bras to different types of breast disorders.

"(the book "Dressed to Kill") reveals the link between bras and breast cancer, explaining in non-technical language how the restrictive nature of bras inhibits the lymphatic system and arguing that the correlation is four times greater than smoking is to lung cancer.
Singer and Grismaijer have collected striking evidence that bra-wearing may be a major risk factor associated with breast cancer: women who wear tight-fitting bras 24 hours a day are 125 times more likely to have breast cancer than women who do not wear bras at all. Their interpretation is that tight clothing inhibits the proper functioning of the lymphatic system (an internal network of vessels and nodes that flushes wastes from the body) and leads to a buildup of carcinogenic compounds in the constricted areas." http://www.all-natural.com/dressed.html

on a personal note--this slave suffers from engorged painful breasts, lasting from 4-6 weeks at a time, with a 2-3 week interval in between. Master allowed His slave to buy a "Shock Absorber" sportsbra from Victoria's Secret to wear during those times. It drastically reduces movement(which helps to manage the pain), is made from materials that breathe, does not have seperate cups or lace and is NOT sexy at all!




perverseangelic -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/2/2005 9:47:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

Bras don't support breasts or stop them from sagging more.


For women with large breasts, it is a matter of comfort--try walking around all day with two free swinging twenty pound football shaped weights hanging from your chest--as well as aesthetics--breasts are confined to an area closer to the armpits than the belly-button and nipples can be arranged to face forward instead of pointing down at the ground, also the amount of cleavage and breast size can be manipulated. However, our modern version of a bra was originally designed to flatten the breasts into a mono-bosom--- the fashion of the day was straight lines, and society couldn't bear to even think about breasts, much less see them defined under clothing.


Yeah, I -hate- this. At my breast size, it is -really- hard to find something that doesn't make uni-boob, which is almost as uncomfortable as not wearing a bra.

~sigh~ Someone needs to make -affordable- but comfortable bras. My good ones were very expensive, and not something I can afford on my own :(

And for me, too, it's a comfort issue, not so much an aesthetic one. The partner likes me without a bra as much as with, but I feel so much better with.




EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/2/2005 9:58:17 AM)

At a size D, I have actually occasionally considered breast reduction, and I already know I will get a lift job at some point in my future. I can NOT imagine women walking around with larger breasts than a D (as in, I can't imagine how they deal with it happily).




mnottertail -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/3/2005 5:28:51 PM)

Now I am slobbering............
dearest PerverseAngelic,
What is a uni-boob?

That's just plain cute......
Ron




sub4hire -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/3/2005 10:23:16 PM)

quote:

What is a uni-boob?


I'm not perverse but a uni boob is what it sounds like. One straight across...no definition. Shelf bra's generally do that. Like those tank tops that claim to have a bra
built in...but they only work for tiny breasts.




MsIncognito -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/4/2005 6:07:11 AM)

What I really find interesting is how many people have commented on how much work (too much work, really) this is for the Dominant. Slavery is a lot of work. Why should the Dom's job be any easier? Lazy Dom syndrome, anyone?

While these rules are definitely not for me (I prefer something just a wee bit more organic in a relationship) if others wish to clearly delineate their relationship in such a manner and they find it helps, then more power to 'em.




MsIncognito -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/4/2005 6:14:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic

~sigh~ Someone needs to make -affordable- but comfortable bras. My good ones were very expensive, and not something I can afford on my own :(


I hear ya. The cost of a good bra is utterly ridiculous. As a G-cup I have to shop at specialty stores. Oh to be a DD.




perverseangelic -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/4/2005 11:22:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MsIncognito

What I really find interesting is how many people have commented on how much work (too much work, really) this is for the Dominant. Slavery is a lot of work. Why should the Dom's job be any easier? Lazy Dom syndrome, anyone?

While these rules are definitely not for me (I prefer something just a wee bit more organic in a relationship) if others wish to clearly delineate their relationship in such a manner and they find it helps, then more power to 'em.


For me, my relationship is about making my partner's life better, easier, and more fun. That isn't to say that his responsiblity is small. Rather, that my job is to make that responsibility (my belonging to him) enjoyable.

I try to take duties on that will help ease his life. I don't think that having a set of rules that requires him to double his work is worth it, unless that makes him happy.

He expects me to be a person who can make my own decitions and choices so that he can assume controll when it suits him, but doesn't have to remind me to go to the bathroom.

That's how my dynamic works. Which is why I didn't understand, at first, this list. Hearing the explanations, itm akes a bit more sense.




asissyforher -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/7/2005 3:59:50 PM)

Are these rules feasable? Are they advised?

i do not know each and every case, so it cannot be answered.
but from a "boys" view?
there is a lot there not in my life in d/s!
so it is up to YOU and YOUR dominant!
if it works, why worry?

thanks
asissy




onceburned -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/7/2005 4:31:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sub4hire
Now I'm no urine aficionado by any means. However, I also remember if you drink too much urine you will have serious issues.


The U.S. military has food pouches for its troops which can be rehydrated with urine - but its recommended only for emergencies since long term the Urea in urine can cause problems.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3915659.stm




mnottertail -> RE: Service "contracts" (no it isn't about legality) (6/7/2005 4:48:58 PM)

reply..............twice in one

I am quite sure that is because of the overload of potassium and the fact that there really isn't hydration in that keg tapping procedure......oh, sure......the foods happy and you don't have to salt it..........Proudsub (the keeper of the archives) could point you to the fact that this is not a new property and was used in the civil war.

second bit......remember people

Bras dont support people........people do

Ron




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125