mstrjx -> RE: Edification in the scene (2/13/2007 11:55:21 AM)
|
I don't think this (the OP) is true. Let me see if I can make my way decently through my meaning. I create a balance in how I communicate with people. With strangers, I'm usually polite, noncommital, boring. If I can get by with silence, all the better. With people who know me on a superficial level, say co-workers and to a greater or lesser extent how I communicate here, I'm about 85% sarcasm. I couch my phrases in such a way in such a way that you can believe that I'm being rude and a boor, but if you stop, take a breath, and think about what I'm saying you will see that there is truth to what I'm saying. I just do it in a way you wouldn't ordinarily SEE the truth. You can usually take what I have to say one of two or three different ways. I don't create doublespeak as a hobby, it's just my way. The other 15% of the time, I'm helpful and genuine in a more direct way. This is the balance that allows people who 'know' me (which isn't anyone, really) to understand that the sarcasm isn't 'real', that a lot of what I say is in jest (kinda). Believe it or not, and I'm not even sure 'I' do, this balance endears me with most everyone around me. I can't explain it. When it truly matters, such as in a relationship, I have the ability to behave the same, but I'm much more cognizant of the mental state of the person I'm with. If I feel they cannot handle my peculiar brand of viewpoint, I will say things in such a way that allow that person to generally feel better about themselves (your words) or become less self-conscious or whatever needs to bolster the relationship. If I find myself in a spot where I have nothing to say wihtout some form of sarcasm, then that is because the actual (bald) truth can only come across unkind. I break ties at that point, because if I have to hurt someone with the truth then I'm better off not being in that situation. Jeff
|
|
|
|