Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Algolagnia


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Algolagnia Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 1:31:31 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
Within the vast realm of WWITWD, I love discovering how different people live out their desires and meet their needs.

The concept of algolagnia is one I’ve been familiar with for a while but a quick search of these boards indicated that it has not really been discussed (there were 3 references and 2 were from me).

Alright, definition time:

Algolagnia is the paraphilia of deriving sexual pleasure from pain. Note that algolagnia is not the same thing as masochism, since there are fewer psychological connotations to algolagnia, which may be a simple liking for pain, without any need for domination, submission or humiliation.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algolagnia

Sometimes I wonder if I’m more into algolagnia then masochism. Those who’ve read some of my past posts know I love the feeling of pain but I really despise when the one inflicting it tries to dominate me. I would not say however that my experiences with pain have been devoid of any psychological implications. I have developed a really deep bond with the primary Sadist that I play with.

Note however that when I am Sadistic, it is always in the realm of Domination.

I know for probably the vast majority of participants to this forum, pain has to be within the realm of D/s. But for those that it doesn’t always have to be, I’d love to hear your perceptions on this.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 2:29:20 PM   
CitizenCane


Posts: 349
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
There is, of course, a purely physiological connection between pain (of some kinds) and sexual pleasure- stimulation of nerve groups, release of endorphins, adrenaline, increased blood flow. However, most human experience is mediated by psychological factors- desires, expectations, etc. Someone you know and love touches your genitals- a stranger touches your genitals- same immediate tactile stimulation, completely different subjective experiences. Algolagnia is just a variety of interpretation.

Citizen Cane

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 2:47:26 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
I'd be inclined to agree with you except for one thing:

quote:

Someone you know and love touches your genitals- a stranger touches your genitals- same immediate tactile stimulation, completely different subjective experiences.


I can't see how this could be compared to masochism vs algolagnia, since algolagnia is about sexual pleasure. I more then likely would not get sexually stimulated if a stranger touched my genitals. But then, that's me.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to CitizenCane)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 2:55:09 PM   
CitizenCane


Posts: 349
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

I'd be inclined to agree with you except for one thing:

quote:

Someone you know and love touches your genitals- a stranger touches your genitals- same immediate tactile stimulation, completely different subjective experiences.


I can't see how this could be compared to masochism vs algolagnia, since algolagnia is about sexual pleasure. I more then likely would not get sexually stimulated if a stranger touched my genitals. But then, that's me.

- LA


That's my point, actually. The purely physical sensation is identical, but it is highly mediated by your understanding of who is doing it. This happens at such a basic level that you may not 'experience' even fractional sexual stimulation before the raw data is interpreted into the 'Get away from me, creep!' category and pretty much shut down. However, imagine for a moment being blindfolded and fondled by someone you know- and only later discovering it was someone else. Your system of real-time mediation would accept the pleasure signals, but your post-hoc interpretation might be pretty confused. All I'm saying is that our experience of sensory input is mediated by our ideas about it.

Citizen Cane

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 3:07:22 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CitizenCane
However, imagine for a moment being blindfolded and fondled by someone you know- and only later discovering it was someone else. Your system of real-time mediation would accept the pleasure signals, but your post-hoc interpretation might be pretty confused. All I'm saying is that our experience of sensory input is mediated by our ideas about it.


Ok. I see where you are coming from. However, the way I understand algolagnia, the physical sensation trumps any psychological element. It isn't restricted to time like in the example you are providing.

In your example, the person believes at the time of the play that they are with a person they trust so they were mislead. All I'm saying is that it's a stretch.

Now if the person would let her/himself be tied up and say "let anyone at me", I would consider that a closer parallel. But in that example, the person is getting sexual pleasure from sexual stimulation.

In the case of algolagnia, the person is getting sexual pleasure from painful stimulation, apparently detached from any psychological elements of domination or control.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to CitizenCane)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 4:36:12 PM   
onceburned


Posts: 2117
Joined: 1/4/2005
From: Iowa
Status: offline
Algolagnia sounds interesting. Would self-inflicted pain fall into this category if it gave sexual pleasure and not simply sensation pleasure?

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 5:38:38 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: onceburned

Algolagnia sounds interesting. Would self-inflicted pain fall into this category if it gave sexual pleasure and not simply sensation pleasure?


It might. I know a masochist who puts clothespins on her nipples when he masturbates. She says focussing on the pain helps get her off.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to onceburned)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Algolagnia - 3/12/2005 9:28:33 PM   
proudsub


Posts: 6142
Joined: 1/31/2004
From: Washington
Status: offline
quote:

I know a masochist who puts clothespins on her nipples when he masturbates. She says focussing on the pain helps get her off.


Doesn't everyone? j/k But ever since i discovered how aroused i get with pain i have done that.

_____________________________

proudsub

"Without goals you become what you were. With goals you become what you wish." .

"You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts"--Alan Greenspan


(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Algolagnia - 3/13/2005 10:09:39 AM   
MrThorns


Posts: 919
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

Algolagnia is the paraphilia of deriving sexual pleasure from pain. Note that algolagnia is not the same thing as masochism, since there are fewer psychological connotations to algolagnia, which may be a simple liking for pain, without any need for domination, submission or humiliation.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algolagnia



I don't really see how this is different from masochism. I understand that within a consentual BDSM relationship a level of D/s is present when a masochist receives pain from a sadist. A masochist enjoys receiving pain, just as a algolaganist(?) enjoys receiving pain....or at least, as far as I can tell from the definitions provided.

I think that within our little circle of BDSMers, we have made alterations on some of the definitions that are considered standard by the rest of the world. When I hear masochist, I automatically assume it to mean one who enjoys consentually agreed upon pain/intensity/discomfort. Webster's sees it a bit differently. Many psychology books have (in the past anyway) defined masochism as a psychological disorder. Maybe we need a BDSM dictionary? (But that would mean assigning labels and such...and man, I hate that.)

~Thorns




I know for probably the vast majority of participants to this forum, pain has to be within the realm of D/s. But for those that it doesn’t always have to be, I’d love to hear your perceptions on this.

- LA



_____________________________

~"Do you know what the chain of command is? Its the chain I beat ya with when ya don't follow my command."

"My inner child is a mean little fucker"

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Algolagnia - 3/13/2005 10:48:53 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrThorns

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

Algolagnia is the paraphilia of deriving sexual pleasure from pain. Note that algolagnia is not the same thing as masochism, since there are fewer psychological connotations to algolagnia, which may be a simple liking for pain, without any need for domination, submission or humiliation.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algolagnia



I don't really see how this is different from masochism. I understand that within a consentual BDSM relationship a level of D/s is present when a masochist receives pain from a sadist. A masochist enjoys receiving pain, just as a algolaganist(?) enjoys receiving pain....or at least, as far as I can tell from the definitions provided.


Actually, I did a bit more research because I'm curious that way and I found this other definition:

Algolagnia: Form of sexual perversion in which the infliction or the experiencing of pain increases the pleasure of the sexual act or causes sexual pleasure independent of the act; includes both sadism (active algolagnia) and masochism (passive algolagnia).
Source: http://www.books.md/A/dic/algolagnia.php

Seems that not even the experts agree on what it is exactly.

I tend to agree with you that there doesn’t seem to be much of a difference. When the original definition said that there were “fewer psychological connotations”, I was wondering how much fewer and where would the line be drawn.

But then I know of people who get off on pain. And I know people who don’t get off on pain but will get off on the idea of receiving any treatment from someone who is dominating them, whether it involves pain or not. One of my boys once told me that he didn’t like the painful feeling from a caning but the feeling he got receiving a caning from me was what one that made him feel safe and complete.

I wouldn’t say that’s the kind of feeling I get when I get a caning. I get off on the painful feeling completely. I wouldn’t let just anyone do it and my preferred sadistic bastard of choice is actually a man I have a whole lot of love for outside of the realm of kink. But when we play these little games, I most appreciate him for the pain he can give me.

So the purpose of my post was simply to try and tease these issues apart and see if the desires came from a different place. I figure we’ve dissected just about every other behaviour here, why not this one ;)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrThorns
I think that within our little circle of BDSMers, we have made alterations on some of the definitions that are considered standard by the rest of the world. When I hear masochist, I automatically assume it to mean one who enjoys consentually agreed upon pain/intensity/discomfort. Webster's sees it a bit differently. Many psychology books have (in the past anyway) defined masochism as a psychological disorder.


We do appropriate terms and I think that is great. So many times I hear from people on the outside "if those freaks want to beat each other and they like it, then good for them" which can be seen as a live and let live statement tinted with judgement. It's all water off a duck's back to us as we've appropriated the words pervert, freak, twisted, bitch and many others and made them good things to be.

As for anything that we do being a psychological disorder, why not. Psychologists and psychiatrists are always revising their diagnostics based on what becomes socially accepted. A disorder is simply something that goes against the hegemonous discourse, nothing more. The reality is that every single individual is driven based on their prior experiences and predispositions, whether their behaviour is considered disorderly or not.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrThorns
Maybe we need a BDSM dictionary? (But that would mean assigning labels and such...and man, I hate that.)


There are a few. My personal favorite is The Deviant's Dictionary And believe it or not, I didn't bother looking up how they defined algolagnia... this is interesting.

Algolagnia: Love of pain, from the Greek. Psychological term to describe SM preferred by sexologist Havelock Ellis, who saw it as 'pain given in love'. Perhaps useful to describe that element of SM that is about the enjoyment of pain itself rather than acting out domination and submission. Ellis's definition is quoted in the Boundaries section of the Dynamics and Definitions Sourcsheet; see also sadomasochism.
Source: http://public.diversity.org.uk/deviant/bodya-d.htm#Algolagnia

The bolded passage is my own, which I guess to a certain point answers my original question. But then again, that is just another opinion. I do however strongly suggest the reading in the Boundaries section as it's a pretty interesting read.

- LA



_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to MrThorns)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Algolagnia - 3/13/2005 1:38:49 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

The bolded passage is my own, which I guess to a certain point answers my original question.


As a friend just pointed out, I got lost in translation. (Try thinking out everything in French and typing it in English!)

What I meant to say is that I bolded that passage to make it stand out. It is not my passage.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Algolagnia Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063