MidnightWriter
Posts: 131
Joined: 2/8/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2 I'm not big on the formal mentoring thing. This is a relationship like any other and people don't need mentoring to be successful in vanilla relationships and there's no real need to need it here. I don't know about you, but I've known several people who needed mentoring to be successful in vanilla relationships. Come to think of it, I was one of 'em. We are surrounded daily with images of vanilla relationships. We see them modeled on television and in movies, read about them in books, see our friends try things that work, and that don't work. Our general society mentors us, and it still doesn't always work - after all, I've been divorced twice. For models of d/s relationships, we mostly have bad porn, good (but unrealistic) porn, less-than-sympathetic portrayals in the media, public events in which the collared subs are (hopefully) on their best behavior, and message boards such as this - where, to be frank, anyone can be spouting fiction but presenting it as fact. If someone has a mentor - another sub or a dominant with whom they don't intend to have a 'Relationship', but from whom they can learn some of the dynamics of a d/s relationship other than by trial and error, this strikes me as A Good Thing. quote:
I, again, think it feeds into submissives minds that they NEED someone else to turn to, rather than relying on someone else. Perhaps, but one cannot learn d/s (or anything else) in a vacumn. I'd find it difficult to imagine a submissive who was not aware that not all subs were mentored, so one being mentored would (I would expect) realize that mentoring was not The Only Way. quote:
While I'm not against mentoring as a whole, I understand its value when done effectively and support it, I see it more often abused and used as a pecking system more than anything. Hrmmm. I'm not entirely sure that I understand what you're saying here. Some time ago, I approached a submissive who informed me that she was under the protection of ... well, let's call him Sir DomlyDom. "Cool", thinks I - while his style is not my style, he's been around for a while and knows 'most everybody, and it's always good having someone to watch your back. Then I'm informed that all negotiation with her must go through him. I walked away from the situation right there. While I've no objection to someone getting advice from wherever they wish, I just couldn't see myself asking SirDD for *his* permission. I've no problem with witnesses to negotiation, but relayed negotiation just isn't my kink. Is this the sort of thing you were talking about? quote:
The closest you could say I mentor is the sub I am dating and my boyfriend. They were both pretty new to the scene when they got to me and both have social anxieties and trouble letting their confidence show. I talk to them a lot about it and give them exercises and things to focus on in order to do that. I also will give them sexual schooling on the right questions to ask people and things to keep in mind. I think the purpose of mentoring should always be the further independence and confidence of the mentee. If you'll agree to swap the word "independence" for "self-reliance", then we'll be in total agreement. If this is to train someone in a style of relationship, and (to me, anyway) relationship implies interdependence, then I'm not sure that independence is a concept that fits.
_____________________________
Power corrupts. Absolute power ... is really pretty nifty.
|