SusanofO -> RE: I might of asked this question before but anyway should euthanasia be legalised? (2/25/2007 10:05:38 AM)
|
NorthernGent (and whoever else is reading this) - Well, we have physician-assisted suicide allowable in the U.S. in the state of Oregon now. There are some objections to that, and there is a federal Supreme Court case re: whether it is able to continue, that will be heard sometimes early next year. I should be looking for articles on how that seems to working (I will try to find some, although am not sure much is avialable, since it's been legal there for such a short time.) It hasn't been allowed legally in other U.S. states yet, but it is probably practiced (my guess) privately, or just not reported, more often than many people think. HerEmeraldEyes: Good post (so sorry about your mom, I know that was-is probably horrible to have to watch. She sounds like a very brave woman). I don't have a probelm with the original idea of euthanasia most people seem to have: That a person with no hope of recovery in horrible pain be offerred a morphine drip or some other medical way to end it all, etc. - if it is their own choice. general comments for anyone: I do (obviously) have a problem with what has evolved in the Netherlands, for the reasons I stated. I am not convinced that is just how this kind of law would tend to evolve in other places, either, in practice, once it's been passed, but it scares me this trend in the Netherlands exists. These decisions are currently very often, (as regards infants, or adults, sometimes) in the hands of doctors on a committee there - the parents don't have the final say at all, which strikes me as just plain wrong. It's creepy (IMO). I know these medical committees supposedly have more medical knowledge, the patient' best interests at heart, etc. but it just creeps me out. It just strikes me as sort of cold and heartless, not to mention it negates the whole idea of self-determination the original law was meant to protect (which I find ironic). It's not their life, it is the patient's life - bottom line. And I do think that situations where the person isn't asked, and it's involuntary are just bound to happen, if we pass the law here in other places, IMO. I think perhaps once it's been legitimized legally, it is simply easier to attempt that kind of thing (and maybe to succeed). And for some reason, passing these laws seems to expand the "range" of "euthanizable people" over a rather short (relatively speaking) period of time (a couple of decades), aside from seeming to make it easier for people bound to do it without the patient's consent to just do that, IMO. **I mean, this country cannot even manage to get dead-beat dads to pay child support - what makes us think we can monitor physician's who have the right to end lives this way? Or monitor the application of non-physician-asssited suicide (like exists in Switzerland)? I am not sure people here really see the connection between the possible profitability for insurance companies and this practice - and am sure they'd much rather believe no company would ever be able to get away with that kind of behavior, when people are contemplating this practice in reality here in the U.S. I do think it could happen, and become more widespread - but I think if Euthanasia laws are passed here, they will be have a very slow evolution. Here, I see it as an emotional, hot-button topic like abortion is, and I predict it will bring a lot of opponents out of the wood-work, if it's on the table for real as far as laws being passed to allow it. There are too many religious groups opposed to it (and some of them have lots of money to toss around at politicians). I think if it is allowed it will be in just a few states, like Oregon, California and maybe Massachusetts, or something. Those particular states tend to be liberal, overall. - Susan
|
|
|
|