RE: "300" The Movie (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


swtrayn -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 7:03:40 AM)

Looks like a great movie by what I have seen by the advertisments.

It actually opens in Theaters here in WI today.

rayn




thompsonx -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 8:11:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FangsNfeet

I can't wait to see what the History Channel comes out with about Spartans.


FangsNfeet:
The problem with the history channel is that it is often factually challanged.
Congrats on your upcomming nuptuals.
thompson




popeye1250 -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 11:03:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RosaB

Have any of you seen the trailers for the movie "300"?   The commercials I've seen of it, on TV, make it look spectacular.  I'm not much for all the fighting and such, but the visuals, the way it appears to be coreographed, well, it blew me away.

Anyone know anything about this movie?  I believe it will be in the theaters next month.

Rosa


"300?" Ahhh! By the way they did the lettering I thought it said "ZOO". lol
And there were actually more that "300", there were about a thousand other Greeks backing up those 300 Spartans according to "The History Channel."




MizSuz -> Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/9/2007 1:22:42 PM)

I've just returned from seeing 300 and, as promised, I'm throwing my opinions and impressions out here.

First I need to make a couple of things clear so you understand my foundational premises.  I am a fan of film interpretations of comics and graphic novels.  No, I don't think they are all good - in fact most of them aren't very good at all, IMNSHO.  However, I do enjoy seeing different approaches to changing mediums.  I like it when a director goes for, and achieves, the feel of the graphic novel without actually turning it into a cartoon.  I liked Sin City, but thought it was too much like a comic book on film, which is to say a cartoon.  I like animation as well but to my mind that's a different genre.  I thought the biggest fault with Sin City was that it couldn't decide if it was animation or not.  I found that distracting.  I suffered no such distractions with 300.

Also, I have not seen Frank Miller's original graphic novel 300 nor the 1962 movie "The 300 Spartans" that the novel was inspired by.  So, my impressions of the movie 300 are not colored by its forebearers.  I was, however, familiar with the story.

I have every intention of owning this movie as soon as it is available.  I'll watch it multiple times, I'm sure.  I would travel some distance to see this movie in IMAX, as has been suggested by a previous poster on this thread, if it were to become available in that format.

First the story.  It's a timeless story of honor, loyalty, brotherhood; disloyalty, greed and tyranny.  It's not a "deep" story but the characters brought a depth that gave the story a face.   I've read that the portion of the story devoted to the relationship between Leonidas and his Queen Gorgo was added for the movie as it did not originally appear in the graphic novel.  I think it leant humanity to the story and I'm glad they added it.  Not only are we presented with Spartan Warriors whose patriotism and subsequent heroism can only be called awesome, but in Lena Headey's Queen Gorgo we get a view of all Spartans full of similar strength and pride.  In one scene in which Xerxes' messenger asks Leonidas by what right a woman speaks to him, her response, "because only Spartan women give birth to real men" is an example of the pride I mention and of some of the fine one-liners this movie offers.  The Queen carries this pride throughout the story.  At no point did I have any trouble believing the characters nor notice the actor rather than the character.  Suspension of disbelief happened early and stayed with me for the entire film.

Aesthetically the film is consistent throughout.  Everything is suffused with either a golden or silver glow that lends warmth or chill to a particular scene.  The CGI is seamless and it's very difficult to discern where pure celluloid ends and CGI begins beyond what common sense tells you simply isn't possible.  The feel of the graphic novel becomes foundational without being distracting.

The battle scenes, which comprise the bulk of the movie, are reminiscent of The Lord of the Rings battle scenes.  Slow motion for emphasis is used in much the same way it was used in Troy.  There is no shortage of blood and guts, but at no time did I feel like I was being inundated with it so that I wouldn't notice the movie.  It was used to propel the story, not in lieu of.

Finally, the entire cast is just beautiful to look at.  Literally everyone in this film is ripped and oiled and nearly naked.  Most of them look like some variation of Brad Pitt in Troy (whom I thought was the only reason to see Troy).  If at any time I was distracted then it was while watching a muscle ripple across a thigh or abdomen; or while appreciating a perfect, classic contrapposto stance.  I have been a fan of Gerard Butler since Timeline and knew, after watching his turn in the second Lara Croft movie, that he was physically beautiful.  Even having seen all the the trailers and 'making of' snippets, I was not prepared for Mr. Butler's physical beauty and presence.  Rodrigo Santoro's Xerxes is nothing short of stunning (those of you who watch "Lost" may recognize him as "Paulo").  I was surprised to discover that David Wenham (Faramir of The Lord of the Rings) has a prominent role as Dilios, who tells the story, and more surprised with his physique.

In this presentation there are 300 Spartans who are joined by at least twice as many Acadians.  Inevitably the Acadians abandon the Spartans, but don't let that be a downer as the end is typically hollywood upbeat (well, it's upbeat if you know how the end of the story goes to begin with).

About 20 minutes into the movie I needed to use the bathroom.  I did not get up until the end of the movie, though.  I was on the edge of my seat the entire time and loath to miss anything.  I may go to see this at the theater again - something I almost never do.




RosaB -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/9/2007 4:35:21 PM)

Hot Damn,

Now that's an endorsement.  [:D]  Even though I was booked to go, I'm more enthused from your review.   See, I new I needed a woman's point of view.   Beautiful  aesthetics,  Troy, Brad Pitt, you need not say anymore.  Didn't feel inundated by the gore of the battle scenes.    Ripped, oiled, half clothed naked men.  Woo Hoo.  Now all we need is the duct tape, um sorry, where's the pause button.  Anyway, that's how to sell a gladiator movie to a woman.    I don't suppose there were any fully naked men?  Just kidding don't want to get gready.  I'm already giddy.  Sounds like more than I could have hoped for. 

But really, I wasn't even going to see the movie for the naked men, it was for the over all asstectics of the movie.

PS.......MizSuz, thank you for taking the time to share that most delightful movie review.   

Oh and I will be seeing it this coming Sunday at the IMAX theater.


Rosa




stef -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/9/2007 4:43:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MizSuz

I have every intention of owning this movie as soon as it is available.  I'll watch it multiple times, I'm sure.  I would travel some distance to see this movie in IMAX, as has been suggested by a previous poster on this thread, if it were to become available in that format.

Come on up to Boston, there are a couple of IMAX theatras showing it right now  [;)]

~stef




thompsonx -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/9/2007 7:45:43 PM)

MizSuz:
That was quite a review ...but I am still too cheap to pay 12 bux to see a movie...so I will just have to wait till it comes out on dvd.
thompson




Mikal -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/9/2007 8:08:22 PM)

I just saw it today... while it isn't a 'bad' movie, I thought it could have been better and/or shorter.  To those interested, there are inuendo's of male nudity - you just don't get to see it.  Definately NOT for children (too bad the genius behind me didn't realize that 18A meant thant it wasnt' suitable for 7 year olds.. *grr*...). Anyway, for cheapy-night, it's fine. Full price at $10+ dollare, not so good.

Point being, it's a decent movie IF you aren't concerned with factualities or historical correctness. Lot's of blood. But not in a Tarantino way. Oh, and definatedly not BDSM related. Except for all the piercings, perhaps.





azzmaster -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 8:21:12 PM)

i saw it this afternoon. acting sucked big time but the costumes and setting is very surreal and worth sittin thru... ling xerxes had a wonderfully fetishy costume. well done indeed on the art direction, could have been alot better with different actors 




BitchTrainerKy -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 9:43:28 PM)

the 300 is quite possibly the best visually produced barbarian movie of all time, it has troy, gladiator, conan, and braveheart all rolled into one action packed movie full of blood guts glory and even managed to throw in some sex scenes in there too. There is absolutely NO slow moments in the movie, its action packed from start to finish, its definitly a feast for the eyes and the ears. I will be going back to the cinemas numerous times to watch this movie, DEFINITLY pay for this flick.




Lorelei115 -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 10:21:05 PM)

I wanna see it... hopefully I will have a chance. I'm mad for that time period anyway, and I actually really liked Sin City. Then again, I'm a fan of comic books in general, so movies done in that sort of style really appeal to me. As long as it doesn't get preachy and moralistic it should be a nice hour and a half of eye candy, at the very least.




Nosathro -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 10:29:13 PM)

According to some historical accounts some 700 Arcadians were in the rear of the Spartans.  The were to keep the covered.  However, the Persians were informed of a "Goat Trail" and they sent troops down the trial past the Spartans.  The 700 Arcadians were no match for the Persians and got whiped out.  The Spartans soon found themselves traped in the pass, not being able to defend the pass King Leonidas ordered the remaining Spartans to attack.

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: RosaB

Have any of you seen the trailers for the movie "300"?   The commercials I've seen of it, on TV, make it look spectacular.  I'm not much for all the fighting and such, but the visuals, the way it appears to be coreographed, well, it blew me away.

Anyone know anything about this movie?  I believe it will be in the theaters next month.

Rosa


"300?" Ahhh! By the way they did the lettering I thought it said "ZOO". lol
And there were actually more that "300", there were about a thousand other Greeks backing up those 300 Spartans according to "The History Channel."




Nosathro -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/9/2007 10:35:35 PM)

FYI The Spartans were not barbarians.  The word "Barbarian" comes from the Greek Language.  To the Greeks anyone who did not speak Greek sounded like they were saying "Bar-Bar".  The Romans continued this by calling many Celtic, German, and Goth tribes "Barbarians.  In spit of the fact Rome employed many of these tribes in their army.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitchTrainerKy

the 300 is quite possibly the best visually produced barbarian movie of all time, it has troy, gladiator, conan, and braveheart all rolled into one action packed movie full of blood guts glory and even managed to throw in some sex scenes in there too. There is absolutely NO slow moments in the movie, its action packed from start to finish, its definitly a feast for the eyes and the ears. I will be going back to the cinemas numerous times to watch this movie, DEFINITLY pay for this flick.




UtopianRanger -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/10/2007 1:11:03 AM)

As Thompson said....excellent review. I look forward to seeing this later tonight.



 - R




GeekyGirl -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/10/2007 8:29:33 AM)

Just saw this last night...It's a touch long and the fighting scenes are a bit repetitive. However, I really did enjoy the story. There's also tons of eye candy for ladies (bout time they made a movie for US!). The visuals are breathtaking and beautiful and the camera work is interesting (one minute things are in slow motion and the next minute they're at double speed.) It makes the fight scenes more interesting.

It was worth seeing on the big screen, but I feel they could have cut 20min of fight scenes out and improved the pacing a bit.

Also, the movie almost comes across as a bit "fantasy" like because of some of the creatures/mutants the persians utilize.







Griswold -> RE: Review - As Promised (semi spoilers) (3/10/2007 6:28:33 PM)

(I'm still waiting to see the "MizSuz; the way I see things" movie).




DesertRat -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/10/2007 6:37:45 PM)

Here's a review of it. I still plan to rent it. Sounds like a hoot.

http://movies2.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/movies/09thre.html?ref=movies

Bob




happypervert -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/10/2007 7:56:45 PM)

Here are links to and short summaries of 32 reviews:

http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/300?q=300




farglebargle -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/11/2007 5:46:20 PM)

With 60 Million dollars on the first weekend, Hollywood Producers are jumping out the window for greenlighting a project with ZERO chance of a sequel.





RosaB -> RE: "300" The Movie (3/11/2007 6:03:04 PM)

Well, back from seeing the movie and not too thrilled.

5 stars for the physiques of the men, 2-1/2 stars for most everything else about the movie.  Picture cardboard cutouts as background scenery.  I was not moved, nor very much entertained, ok I felt a little something in my lower regions.  I enjoyed the fight scenes, I enjoyed the overflow of testosterone dripping from every bone, every shout of honor to fight to the death, but in the end, I and most of the movie going public just don't seem to click on this one.  Maybe I just need to get some glasses or something or the theater where I saw it had received the wrong reel. 

But still, I might buy this movie, at a discounted rate, to have control over the pause button, just to see the hard ripples on the most magnificent bodies known to men, over and over again and again.  Wait wait, the best acting in the movie, I have to say was left to the queen, in a particular scene that I do give cu dos for, where the queen gives someone their due.  Other than that, I actually yawned a few times.

If you like, what's that turtle movie called?  Oh yeah, Ninja Turtles, you might like this, also, might like the style of the movie if you are a "Sin City fan",   I'm still glad I had the chance to see it on the big screen, the company of the people I was with was well worth it. 
Next time warn me about all the boobies. 

Listen, this is just my take.  What everyone finds visually beautiful is quite different.  To me, the first LOR, now that was visually stunning, those visuals, the scenery in that movie, stirred me to the core.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875