Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 9:49:42 AM   
MissBabydoll


Posts: 62
Joined: 8/9/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hereyesruponyou

Hey guys, I'm curious. This is a mind bender kinda question, i am addressing it to male slaves, but anyone feel free to give me an opinion, that's all you can have on this topic anyhow. Just trying to understand the mindset....

If you truly believe in Female Supremacy, that women are just better and meant to rule you poor weak males....how do you justify the fact that there are femal subs/slaves. Do you think only some females are worthy of being worshipped? Because i find with males who have this attitude that they are ready to immediately lie at my feet without even knowing me. A little insane in my opinion, but i'm a safety nut.

I guess i wonder where do you see these other women then? Still above you? Or somewhere else entirely....

Thanks in advance for the effort if you answer!!!




As so often on these boards, the discussion is a muddle because people are not precise in their use of language. Female Supremacy is one thing, Female Superiority is another.

Let's start with the notion of Female Superiority, as advanced by Dommes I greatly respect, like Elise Sutton. Most versions acknowledge that men have all sorts of fine qualities but argue that in all important respects, women are "superior" to men. I don't like this notion of overall "superiority," myself, because I think it just inverts patriarchal/phallocentric ways of thinking without really going beyond them.

Now to Female Supremacy. The more hardcore version of this idea, as found in Elise Sutton's writings and lots of others, is simply the political outgrowth of Femal Superiority: if women are superior, they should rule, period.

I come from a scientific background (though not a scientist) and I have a respect for evidence. I don't think that it's legitimate to claim that men are in some general sense "inferior" to women. Given all that men have achieved in art and science and technology, any such claim would be absurd on the face of it. I do think, though, that *on average*, women have more of the capacities required to hold society together and to guide it effectively. From what I can see from the research, women *on average* are more empathic, better listeners, more inclined to negotiation than aggression, less concerned with individual gain and more with collective welfare, and less impulsive when making major decisions. In a highly interconnected, ecologically fragile, deeply unjust and inequitable, and horribly violent and war-torn world, it seems to me those qualities are better suited to leadership than traditionally male ones.

Two examples:Lawrence Summers, former head of the World Bank and former President of  Harvard--who is a total sexist about women in the sciences, btw--says that the key to development in poor countries is the education of women and theor economic empowerment. Mohammed Yunus, the guy they just gave a Nobel for starting the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, has found that giving *women*--not men--the small loans to buy livestock or equipment is what gets whole communities out of poverty. Meanwhile, what do the Christian Right, the Islamic fundamentalists, ultra-Orthodox Jews, and for that matter Hindu nationalists and old-style secular fascists have in common? Gynophobia and an insistence on *male* supremacy, as well as dogmatism, intolerance, and the willingness to impose their disgusting views by law or by force.

So I guess I'm a moderate Female Supremacist. I don't regard men as "inferior," whatever that might mean. Just less suited to run things.




(in reply to hereyesruponyou)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 10:48:51 AM   
StellaByStarlite


Posts: 790
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline
Hello, MissBabydoll. =)
 
Your post made me think of an excellent book by one of my favorite science fiction writers, Sheri. S Tepper. It's called "The Gate To Women's Country" It's set in the future, after society as we know it has been destroyed by war weapons. What's left of the population has formed into two separate societies: the women in the cities, who keep what's left of sciences and culture intact, and the men in military garrisons outside the cities. The men protect the cities, engage in wargames, etc.
 
A few times of year, though.. the men are allowed in the cities ( through "The Gate") for partying, sex and whatever. The boy children  that result from the sex are handed over to the garrisons at age five, and at 15 are given a choice: stay outside the society of women or choose life within it. It's a really well-written book about gender roles and how we interact with each other. The simple sketch of the plot I've just outlined suggests it's just "male-bashing", but it's not really. It's a wonderful read.
 
Cheers,
Stella
 
 

(in reply to MissBabydoll)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 12:03:17 PM   
porthuronsub


Posts: 339
Joined: 4/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

I find that male subs/slaves are strang creatures,many are in it for the sex only.Now I hear you all screaming but its true.


I am happy with your choice of wording, because as "many" may only be in it for the sex, not "all" of us are.  I love serving my Mistress in the many non-sexual ways that she chooses.  Sex is just a plus and isn't even in the top ten reasons why I love her as my Mistress.

(in reply to BOUNTYHUNTER)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 12:22:03 PM   
YourhandMyAss


Posts: 5516
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
that book sounds good may actualy read if the library has it.

(in reply to StellaByStarlite)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 12:32:45 PM   
PhDslave


Posts: 74
Joined: 9/24/2005
Status: offline
Bounty Hunter's post was excellent because of  the accuracy of his observation.

Miss Baby Doll's was incredibly insightful and one of the best I've ever read anywhere.  The things you learn on this crazy site.

I don't believe in any kind of supremacy, but acknowledge the truths of Baby Doll's observations. I'm probably not very hardcore nor am I a masochist. I like to be able to express love in a committed relationship in ways that are not standard for most people. It gives me pleasure especially when I know by doing so She appreciates such behavior. In an unconscious way,  this behavior helps to  condition me into becoming  more understanding, more forgiving, more other-directed and a 'better' man.  The 'whips 'n chains' stuff just seems to make it more exciting and sexy.

Oh,  before I leave I don't want to give the wrong impression and since  an opportunity to troll should never be missed, ...I'm single.

(in reply to porthuronsub)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 12:51:56 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hereyesruponyou

Female Supremacy


This is not a factual question at all, but a state of mind question. I don't in fact believe in female supremacy, but in BDSM it has an interesting spot in my imagination.

To some degree female supemacy is like money, in and of itself its nothing, but if people believe in the currency, it holds value.


(in reply to hereyesruponyou)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 9:01:55 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

I find that male subs/slaves are strang creatures,many are in it for the sex only.Now I hear you all screaming but its true..AS a married dom couple we find that at the start males are on their best behavior and as time goes by seems to forget that they are there for one reason and turn into whinning little sobs..Kept in chasity begging for release at out discreation...especially ts and gender benders turn into divas ... For that reason we shall only consider a top of the line bi male slave,I know this is harsh but thats the way I see the situation...BH


I would respond to this charge in great detail, but it doesn't give me an erection.

(in reply to BOUNTYHUNTER)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 9:05:57 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

I find that male subs/slaves are strang creatures,many are in it for the sex only.Now I hear you all screaming but its true..AS a married dom couple we find that at the start males are on their best behavior and as time goes by seems to forget that they are there for one reason and turn into whinning little sobs..Kept in chasity begging for release at out discreation...especially ts and gender benders turn into divas ... For that reason we shall only consider a top of the line bi male slave,I know this is harsh but thats the way I see the situation...BH



_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to BOUNTYHUNTER)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/24/2007 9:07:47 PM   
FukinTroll


Posts: 6277
Joined: 2/6/2007
From: Under a bridge
Status: offline
Well crap. Guess I can't tell you to go to Gor can I?

_____________________________

I'm the guy your girl is thinking about when she is fucking you!

TrollTopia
Greedy Groupie!

The Mods have me on speed Spank!! Gotta luv'em.

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/25/2007 6:02:19 AM   
StellaByStarlite


Posts: 790
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss

that book sounds good may actualy read if the library has it.


Oh, it is. All of her books are incredible actually, so if you can't find that particular one, pick up something else of hers.
Science fiction with a social slant to it.

Cheers,
Stella

(in reply to YourhandMyAss)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/25/2007 2:56:08 PM   
babyboyk


Posts: 90
Joined: 5/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hereyesruponyou

Hey guys, I'm curious. This is a mind bender kinda question, i am addressing it to male slaves, but anyone feel free to give me an opinion, that's all you can have on this topic anyhow. Just trying to understand the mindset....

If you truly believe in Female Supremacy, that women are just better and meant to rule you poor weak males....how do you justify the fact that there are femal subs/slaves. Do you think only some females are worthy of being worshipped? Because i find with males who have this attitude that they are ready to immediately lie at my feet without even knowing me. A little insane in my opinion, but i'm a safety nut.

I guess i wonder where do you see these other women then? Still above you? Or somewhere else entirely....

Thanks in advance for the effort if you answer!!!






for me, it isnt necessarily about the female supremacy ideal, its just that i am submissive, and when i talk to other submissive girls, on line, i talk to them as equals, though to be honest, some could probablly be more dominant than myself. another point you raise, some guys are not weak as such, though i admit that i dont do multi-tasking, and have a low irritation level for instructions and stuff....

_____________________________

dont blame me, blame the fairies

(in reply to hereyesruponyou)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 1:47:57 AM   
TheGaggingWh0re


Posts: 222
Joined: 1/19/2006
Status: offline
This reminds me of a few personal messages I have gotten in the past month. One was a male who absolutely insisted he submit to me, despite me voicing my discomfort and refusal to acknowledge his 'titles', and another dominant male who said I had a more 'domineering personality than a slave personality', all because I speak my mind and I'm not a total twit about it.

To each their own, one of the greatest quotes ever said, but I do respect a great deal of Male subs who can manage to squeak out my name and not 'Miss' when in correspondence. I myself am the bottom of bottoms, I like to be the very lowest person on any hierarchy- a sub to subs, etc, as long as it is with my Owner's permission/insistence, so I have to admit that coming across someone who wants to be lower than me...or rather, insists on being lower than me, is unnerving. I don't care what sex they are. Some boys are so pent up in their energy to be my 'bitch' (as this one said) that they forget one of my most repeated quotes:
"I haven't a dominant bone in my body!"

So, female supremacy is great for those who love it, but for those who don't, mind their toes :)

(in reply to kinkiminx)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 7:40:32 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hereyesruponyou

Hey guys, I'm curious. This is a mind bender kinda question, i am addressing it to male slaves, but anyone feel free to give me an opinion, that's all you can have on this topic anyhow. Just trying to understand the mindset....

If you truly believe in Female Supremacy, that women are just better and meant to rule you poor weak males....how do you justify the fact that there are femal subs/slaves. Do you think only some females are worthy of being worshipped? Because i find with males who have this attitude that they are ready to immediately lie at my feet without even knowing me. A little insane in my opinion, but i'm a safety nut.

I guess i wonder where do you see these other women then? Still above you? Or somewhere else entirely....

Thanks in advance for the effort if you answer!!!


As a male, I'll see if I can shed some light here.  I'm dominant, and don't believe in any sort of gender, racial, religious, or venutian supremacy of any sort.  I'm going to put a disclaimer on this post; it's just my opinion.  I doubt very much that men who believe in female supremacy will enjoy this post.  I am prepared to be flamed, but please understand that I write this as an observer and I will gladly discuss any of the as politely as I can.  I'm not psychologist, to boot, so, hell, I might be completely wrong in everything I say.

There's a conflict of social expectations here.  Many people do not feel comfortable in positions of authority.  A portion of these people see themselves as inherently flawed, weak, or incapable of taking care of themselves (emotionally, physically, etc.)  It's like an extreme case of a lack of self-esteem.  (I touch on this theme over on the Sex Offenders thread; the results are obviously very different, but the mindset is similar.)  If interest, is that there is a large gap in the difference between the male submissive who believes he is inferior to females, and male submissives who believe themselves inferior to all people.  In mentally asserting to himself, that all females are superior, he releases himself from responsibility in the relationship.  We can see an example of this here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lewis

I consider most submissive women as superior to me because most of them are actually quite strong and confident. The only reason why they choose to be submissive is because it gives them pleasure. And they know how to get this pleasure as well. I have to say that I read a lot of profiles of submissive women and some of them turn me on. Not because I imagine what it would be like to make them submit to me but rather because I realize that they are attractive and that I will never have sex with them. It is a bit like having to endure cuckolding.


Whatever happens to him, cannot be his fault; after all, he has surrendered all control, power, and authority (read responsibility) to the female.  Thus, in surrendering to any (and every) female who crosses his path, he is freed from normal social constraints and consequences of his mistakes in pursuing said females.  This isn't strictly sexually desire in nature; many of these men have no desire for sex.  It's roots are usually sexual though, stemming from a lifetime of unhappy, unsuccessful, or unfulfilling relationships with women; this is why he believes himself inferior only to women. 

My experiences with such men have been they have little interest in relationships with other men, of any kind.  Thus, they don't really give much thought to why men might be dominant anymore than they give thought to why a cashier at McDonalds is working there.  Because men don't fit their relationship goal equations, they are simply ignored.  Female submissives, on the other hand, are seen as potential relationship partners in the same way as dominant women but only within the same (I'm certain the submissive women getting emails from these men can attest to that fact.)  It doesn't matter how dominant or submissive the woman is; so long as she is willing to accept the relationship on the man's terms; that she bear the weight of responsibility for it's success or failure.

On a side note, this explains a bit why female subs don't understand many male subs; female subs tend to submit to only one person, male or female.  They don't (usually) see any one sex as particularly superior or inferior, but rather see people emotionally, in non-sexual terms.  I'm drawing very broad generalities here; obviously, there are women who suffer the same sort of social issues as their male counterparts.  The issue here, is that men have traditionally been the dominant, and heterosexual.  Male dominated television programming has had a huge impact on the way sex and sexuality has been portrayed, as a commercialization of that sexual drive.  As suggested before, women would prefer to see a photo of a man with a woman, when the woman is smiling, than a photo of just a man smiling.  It shows the man is capable of pleasing his mate, making him a more capable provider; and thus exactly the sort of man the female might desire.  Fortunately, we have other factors to influence our relationship desires (mutual interests in music, food, travel, cultural issues, religion, politics, the list goes on.)  Thus, women don't suffer the same taboos that men do in terms of their relationship choices; they aren't ostracized for their bisexuality.  Men, on the other hand, face enormous sanctions for such admissions.  These elements all derive back to evolution. 

Seems I wrote a bit more than I had intended.  My apologies again if I offended any; it is not my intention to do so.

Take care,

Stephan

_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to hereyesruponyou)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 8:09:58 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline

Hi there Babydoll, and thank you for your interesting statements.  I usually read the whole thread before I make responses, but I had an idea and wanted to run with it.

The argument you present is an old one indeed.  Pa comes back inside from working the fields complaining about how he's got to go to some damned fool town hall meeting.  Ma says it'd be a near sight better iffin it were the women who went to the meeting and not the men.  Pa snorts, saying the women already do that in the square during the market, annen all they end up decidin is who's the ugliest, and who don't go to church 'nuf.  Ma says how she knows the most decisions made at the town hall are 'bout who's greasing enough palms to get elected mayor this year.  Pa says hush woman, you dunno nuthin about man's business.

Life goes on.

Throughout history, men have held power, because they could physically hold power.  Very, very few women have been in positions of power previous to the last hundred years, and those that came into positions of power did so through skillful manipulation of political, legal, and religious mechanisms.  It's no accident; before the advance of gunpowder, winning wars meant skillful combat.  Elise, on the other hand, lives in an age where a 7 year old girl can shoot and kill the largest, meanest murderer.  For the record, I agree this is a good thing.

I don't disagree that the qualities that many women possess are valuable in managing a country; empathy, lack of impulsive decisions, less personal aggression, etc.  However, there are other skills and qualities that a politician must possess that are seen less desirable, but no less vital; the ability to sacrifice the lives of a few, to save the lives of many.  The willingness to inflict further damage on an enemy, to ensure it saves the lives of your own men.  The willingness to make political compromises that would turn most people's stomachs, to advance the greater good.  Simply put, common people do not, and do not wish to, understand how complicated the political system becomes.  They like the simple answers that dictators and kings can give them without any public display of internal struggle.  With the war in Iraq as an example, rather than hold the senators and representatives who continue to permit and finance the war, we clamor for Bush's head.  After all, he is the 'simple' figurehead that needs to pay the price.

Peace and love are beautiful ideals.  They do not put food in people's stomachs, nor protect the farm from wolves.  Recognizing that the job these men and women do is extremely difficult, may help lessen the gap that suggests that any woman would be better.  I don't know any woman in my personal life who would feel qualified and comfortable having a discussion about nuclear warheads in Korea with their Prime Minister, or who could stomach a conversation about Islamic radicals in Iraq.  That which makes women good mothers, historically, has made them poor political leaders. 

Please note, I'm not suggesting women should not be involved in the political process.  I would gladly vote for a woman who I felt shared my political and social goals, if I was convinced that she had the strength of will to carry them out.  Currently, I live in a country with a female president.  As president, so far, none of the initiatives she promised have been carried out, except to raise taxes.  On the other hand, I also firmly agree that the only solution for poor countries is to educate their women (and their men, of course.)  The more hands we have growing food the more food there is growing.  The more women are given futures besides babymakers, the more likely they are to do something more productive than simply make babies.  I certainly share the feminist view that a woman can have as many children as she wishes; I simply adopt the pragmatic view, that any children she has, she should be capable of providing for.  The same goes for men.

Equality won't come from demanding equality; it'll come when people stop demanding it, because they have it.  It isn't the obligation of the state to make people equal, it's the obligation of the people to make themselves equal.

Stephan


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to MissBabydoll)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 9:09:21 AM   
petstorm


Posts: 49
Joined: 6/22/2006
Status: offline
i'm just gonna throw this out there, then leave it alone... i'm naturally submissive. i believe in the opposite of this, as in it's more natural for a man to be dominant. There are exceptions to every rule, and we all must follow our own natures. And i also respect those who choose to kneel.

However, being the submissive that i am, and knowing how miserable i'd be if i were above a man, i would see that man as being weak. But on the flip side, neither do i see myself below all men. Only one man is my Master, and only one man will ever get my gift of submission. The rest get to see the spirit of a red head. But that doesn't mean i want to be above them!

Don't get all unbent guys, that's just the way i am. But then, you've never seen just how submissive i can be in the control of my Master! And for a man to be more so... wow, the term mindless drone would have to apply.

Being equal with him i could see, but a man being below me? Nope! Not a chance!

(in reply to kinkiminx)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 9:14:58 AM   
petstorm


Posts: 49
Joined: 6/22/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FukinTroll

Well crap. Guess I can't tell you to go to Gor can I?


lmao, i know what side of the fence You're on! Got room for a past kajira over there?

(in reply to FukinTroll)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 9:17:27 AM   
FukinTroll


Posts: 6277
Joined: 2/6/2007
From: Under a bridge
Status: offline
 
pet, my posts should come with a warning label.
 
Do not feed the Troll unless you want to be abducted by him.

_____________________________

I'm the guy your girl is thinking about when she is fucking you!

TrollTopia
Greedy Groupie!

The Mods have me on speed Spank!! Gotta luv'em.

(in reply to petstorm)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 9:36:45 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
I don't believe in any sort of gender supremacy as it is often thought of. What I do see is seperate unique qualities that the genders do not share that make each special in their own way.

In addition I think what works for each of us depends on the qualities that are important to us. In many ways I see certain actions or personality traits as weak and detract from a persons ability to dominate effectively. However it has become apparent that my ideas are not commonly shared. While many of those traits are more common in one gender or the other I don't see them as making one gender supreme in their ability to be dominant.

The same goes for positive traits. What I find admirable and deserving of respect is not always valued by others. Example: a male submissive may have a desire for a Domina that looks good in leather and swings a paddle while calling him slut and little piggy. All without a care as to how she treats others and carries herself in her community. OR, a female submissive may be impressed by a strong manly physique and not care that he cannot manage his finances.

On the flip side a dominant man or woman will have their own unique list of important issues they look for. I don't think any quality will make a person or gender more or less surpreme to the world overall......it is too individualistic for that to be the case.

That being said I have payed close attention to those that are more gender, specifically female, supremacy minded and I do understand how they feel and why. As long as those that subscribe to this in their life do not try to make it a "one true way" for everyone and look down their noses at those that do not agree but remain respectful, then......why not?




_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to petstorm)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 5:49:43 PM   
petstorm


Posts: 49
Joined: 6/22/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FukinTroll

 
pet, my posts should come with a warning label.
 
Do not feed the Troll unless you want to be abducted by him.


Good thing i don't have any food with me!

(in reply to FukinTroll)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy - 2/26/2007 7:33:47 PM   
dicipline2


Posts: 63
Joined: 5/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: petstorm

i'm just gonna throw this out there, then leave it alone... i'm naturally submissive. i believe in the opposite of this, as in it's more natural for a man to be dominant. There are exceptions to every rule, and we all must follow our own natures. And i also respect those who choose to kneel.

However, being the submissive that i am, and knowing how miserable i'd be if i were above a man, i would see that man as being weak.


In other words, you want the one sided M/f and anything  different seems "weak" or "wrong" ,whatever right?

This is what totally irks me about femsubs besides the fact that they top from the bottom, as others have mentioned. Another thing that irks me is the doms who are of the same opinion and are probably slightly homophobic, not that male subs are gay or cant be. As a general rule, and hopefully one that avoids issues with femsubs and male doms in the future, I dont think your orientation has anything to do with being submissive or Dominant. I also dont think that the "gorean golden rule" where it is "natural" and "normal"   for women to be submissive to men should be universally accepted as gospel. Nor should the opposite way be accpeted as gospel. Thats where the BDSM community gets divided because each side tends to want to force its view on the other. Well, its a waste of time.

As far as female supriority, it is kind of silly in a way. Its just like the M/f groups who think everyone should be like them.

As a male sub I think women should be treated with respect. femsubs? same thing. Sorry gals, Im not going to bottom dom you to fulfill your fantasy of "strong men rule over weaker women" and I would expect the same from them. As a general rule, just dont interfere or enforce views on a Master/Mistress or their subs.


(in reply to petstorm)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Male slaves & Female Supremacy Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094