mp072004
Posts: 381
Joined: 12/22/2005 Status: offline
|
You and your husband might talk about the ways you can enjoy your preferred leisure activities with people other than him, and make a clear covenant. It's only unfaithful or wrong to have sex with someone other than your spouse, or to go to the movies with someone other than your spouse, IF your relational agreements prohibit it. I would advise you to contemplate what, exactly, you want, and the negotiate for it. "Getting to Yes" is a good book for negotiation, although tons of good books on rhetoric and argumentation have been written and would be good as well. "The Ethical Slut" is a well-written introduction to non-monogamy. It sounds like you and your husband are having reasoned discussions. You've explained that you have certain desires, he has explained that he won't help you out with them. This is good. This leads me to be optimistic about your ability to negotiate ways for you and he to engage in leisure activities separately. Turning to your theoretical question, one can certainly have a relationship where one person has more authority than the other without anyone removing clothes. Your relationship with your boss is likely a good example of this non-sexual inequal power. Does providing non-sexual service, like housework, appeal to you? If so, then you may have found your niche as a servant, or service submissive. If you and your husband define sex as genital touching, and if that's the only thing forbidden to you with others, you can "play" as well--you might be bound, spanked, or embarrassed, without any genital touching at all. I top people without fucking them, and rarely is it because they or I have relationship rules that forbid proper sex. Monica
|