RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


SimplyMichael -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/26/2007 8:11:53 AM)

kom,

You haven't in fact answered my question, in fact you cleverly danced around it.  I am frankly a bit surprised at your rather superficial reading of my post and your subtle attack on me as a "one wayer" something most people here would certainly not label me as.

Your responses sound like you simply read it hoping you could find things to hang attacks on, which seems beneath you.

How could you ignore where I said
quote:

Thanks for the great post!  I didn't mean to imply that my OP was the only way.  I was trying to show why the emphasis on punishment is self-defeating.
which was one of the very first posts in response to someone who took the time to write and actual thoughful response.




GeekyGirl -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/26/2007 8:19:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl

Ya know Geeky, there is a saying (although i can't recall the exact wording but i'll give the gist):  Never make someone a priority who treats you as an option.  i have pretty much made that my personal motto.  i just really don't have time to try to work on connecting with another when they don't have the time of day for me.  Just a thought to share.
 
DG


DG, I love that and I will remember it !




agirl -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/26/2007 8:55:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

quote:

 I have to say that that isn't my experience of M/s.  The description you gave sounds like a demanding toddler. Maybe M is strange but he doesn't need that kind of attention from me.    


Waves Hi back at ya, agirl
 
I put it badly in my prior post, although I do think there are some dominants who fit the description as you say of a ‘demanding toddler’, my point is that everyone craves attention from others. Some know how to get it in a good way, others have learned a more negative approach to getting what they need.  I believe that is true whether one is the D, the s, or not into bdsm at all.
However, I would argue that dominance is a demand for attention.  Even when the submissive’s focus is placed not so much on the person but to the details which make the dominant’s life easier, more organized, and generally free of the clutter of daily minutiae,  I believe that is a way of giving him/her attention. 



 Hey again,

I do appreciate that.

I have a different type of relationship and I'm not required to to *do stuff* for M. He does his own thing and takes care of himself. I belong to him, but he didn't take ownership because he wanted attention but because he could steer my life in a better way than I could.

Regards, agirl





cloudboy -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/26/2007 9:16:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: agirl



I have a different type of relationship and I'm not required to to *do stuff* for M. He does his own thing and takes care of himself. I belong to him, but he didn't take ownership because he wanted attention but because he could steer my life in a better way than I could.

Regards, agirl [/font][/size][/color]



If I were a Dom, this is the type of Dom I would want to be. I would not want my sub revolving around me doing stuff or "my bidding." I am able to get my own glass and of water and carry my own bags. Instead, I would prefer to be an enlightened, kinky mentor. Anyway, at least this is what I tell myself.

As I see it from the outside, a DOM has to know how to play "offense." That can be quite complicated, and IMO offense is more involved than playing defense or following an enumerated plan (submission.)




SusanofO -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/26/2007 9:19:59 AM)

Maybe it's because I am really a Switch, but - punishment (vs. nurturing) isn't usually effective on me unless I am really "into" the other person. If I am not, it just makes me angry, turns me off, and can possibly ruin the relationship (I am talking about physical punishment mostly, I guess).

Nurturing seems to almost always be effective. But again, that's me, maybe not everyone.

- Susan




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/26/2007 1:48:07 PM)

Well said.

I've never seen the purpose in rewarding bad behavior personally. I prefer to ignore it or even better...take a time out to discuss what it is that is causing them to act out negatively. Much easier to reward good behavior than to fight the cycle of negative behavior to get attention. Great post, thanks!




chrissyslave -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/27/2007 1:24:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Maybe it's because I am really a Switch, but - punishment (vs. nurturing) isn't usually effective on me unless I am really "into" the other person. If I am not, it just makes me angry, turns me off, and can possibly ruin the relationship (I am talking about physical punishment mostly, I guess).

Nurturing seems to almost always be effective. But again, that's me, maybe not everyone.

- Susan



Nicely said Susan.  We are all a bit different but think that Susan illustrates the point that there are timelines in a relationship where punishment will be less and more effective, and used too soon could be negative to the relationship, but that does vary to the type and extent of the punishment (due to issues of strength of the M/s relationship that exists, initial or ongoing trust issues, degree of certainty of why the sub/slave is really acting that way, knowledge of the environment that the sub/slave has in their lives, especially on-line relationships which must be communicated, etc.).

Maybe more than just constant "attention" the sub/slave needs an occasional greater show of care (a hug, deeper words of appreciation, etc.) or something else that is making them emotional or a problem that they are not comfortable to bring up...or maybe they feel you would not be receptive to hearing about your other influences in life...outside of your M/s relationship (job, family etc.).  And consider that "acting out" might just be a form of showing OTHER areas that need some adjustments, so making such "needs/wants more attention" assumptions need discernment.  Some of the sub/slave's expressions might simply be misdirected emotions and thoughts, especially if you fit the role of say a former master, or bad father or abuse of some sort, so need to see a different type of response when your "buttons" as a Dom/Master are pressed (testing you and the relationship, or the set boundaries). 

My suggestion for Dom/Masters is to have a variety of responses available and see what works over time as the relationship progresses, be progressive with responses, and not become automated in your responses, as the above sub factors are likely to vary over time, the relationship develops and other influences vary.   

For myself, I think in the longer run a very occasional fuller expression of care plus small regular reinforcement would go a long ways with my lower level "attention needs," but I know I have other issues or initial growth/learning type concerns which take precedence over any need for attention for just attention sake early on.  In my view, receiving punishment for what is really a short-term sign of a greater need of "self discipline" and more focus on the Master would be counterproductive, as my heart is willing but sometimes the flesh/situation hinders desired behaviors, at least in the shorter-run. 

So knowledge, discernment, and having a variable response is what will work better in this sub's case, and perhaps in many cases.  Without that a Sir is in effect just "beating a blocked horse" which isn't going to make it go any faster in the direction of desired behavior.  But if instead he/she sees and tests different cause/effects and helps clear my path ahead then watch me gallop!  So what I try to do is communicate what is my current concerns are and any historic factors that are affecting my behavior and responses, so he is able to make a more fully informed decision about his responses.  Then the informed decision-making is more in his hands, and therefore he becomes more responsible for my reaction to any discipline/punishment/attention that would be decided to be melted out.  I am trusting that if a One is given all that is relevant that he/she is capable of making better decisions overall, and that includes how to best guide me.  Give a strong wrong reaction early on, and to the incorrect "problem" and like Susan it can ruin a relationship, i.e., the horse will buck...and might try to throw it's rider off.

And Sir Michael, that "swat on the rear" sounds rather enticing so pray tell...what would one have to do to get that response from you?...smiles! 
chrissyslave    

Sidenote to LBO who said:
Fantastic post, chrissyslave, and very insightful. 

Ahhh...shucks...so nice of you to notice my post!  (...blushing)




agirl -> RE: Punishment vs. Nurturing (2/27/2007 5:42:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: agirl



I have a different type of relationship and I'm not required to to *do stuff* for M. He does his own thing and takes care of himself. I belong to him, but he didn't take ownership because he wanted attention but because he could steer my life in a better way than I could.

Regards, agirl



If I were a Dom, this is the type of Dom I would want to be. I would not want my sub revolving around me doing stuff or "my bidding." I am able to get my own glass and of water and carry my own bags. Instead, I would prefer to be an enlightened, kinky mentor. Anyway, at least this is what I tell myself.

As I see it from the outside, a DOM has to know how to play "offense." That can be quite complicated, and IMO offense is more involved than playing defense or following an enumerated plan (submission.)



I didn't gravitate toward M because I wanted to be submissive and serve someone.........it was because he was a remarkable leader.

He didn't take me because he needed someone attending his *needs and desires*, or because he needed to control someone or desired someone to serve, but because he knew he could make a difference in my life. Of course, he CAN have me attending those things, if he fancies it.....but it's not why we're here.

Unlike many relationships, we aren't the *completing parts* of each other and the relationship isn't equal.

agirl

 





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125