hisannabelle
Posts: 1992
Joined: 12/3/2006 From: Tallahassee, FL, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
As for the posters who said it "squicks" them, there are any number of people squicked by anal sex, scat play, bdsm, Barney The Dinosaur, whatever. I would point out that this is your issue and not a universally shared moral standard. sinergy - i wasn't trying to set a moral standard. like i said, i firmly believe in prostitution and other kinds of sex work, so i have no place talking down to anyone for paying for sexual services rendered. all i mentioned was that for whatever reason, financial domination has always been hard for me to understand, and yes, it does squick me...that said, i do my best to restrain from judging financial dom/mes, because for me the squickiness is just a personal feeling, not me trying to impose any morality on anyone. after reading this thread, i think part of the reason i tend to shy away from financial domination is because of the way i personally see domination in general, and financial domination, along with pro domination, doesn't really fit into the way i personally feel comfy defining domination. but again, that's just personal preference and belief, and i'm not trying to impose it on anyone else. (although thanks for the interesting thread, as it's helped me understand my beliefs a bit better.) :) but yeah, i apologize if it came across as though i were trying to impose some universal moral standard. i don't believe in universal moral standards, generally, so that totally was not my intention.
< Message edited by hisannabelle -- 2/27/2007 5:30:54 PM >
|