FLButtSlut
Posts: 344
Joined: 3/17/2005 Status: offline
|
A very important point is missing all over here. While there certainly is some D/s level to this, there is also reality. I wish you all the best, and hope that you both have a long and happy relationship. The fact though, is that you are NOT getting married, and therefore, the mingling of your finances someday could become an issue. This is where there are no D/s elements to consider but rather the reality of two human beings sharing a home, and the responsibilities that come with it. If she were to hand all of her money over to you, or vice versa, certainly one of you loses control of that aspect of your life. As the common voice states, who ever is better should maintain that control of those finances to make sure that the bills get paid and spending money available. It seems the big "sticking point" here is how can you be a dom/master if your sub/slave is giving you an allowance? Get over it. If you like to spend impulsively, and she can be more careful (by the way, don't knock the vacuum just yet, it might be worth the money) with that spending, she should control the finances. It is not about who is better or worse, who is in control or not. It is about what the two of you want for the future and what is the best way to get there. Storm's comment about the 3 bank accounts is the best way to go at this point. Household expenses are relatively easily to calculate on a monthly basis (with a bit of extra for emergencies) and each of you contribute to that account, while maintaining individual accounts with the balance. If you want to put the D/s element into it, monitor how she uses the money in her individual account. You might even want to set up a 4 account for savings if the two of you want to save for big purchases. Here are the main things you need to remember.... 1. As an unmarried couple, should the relationship end, if all money has been pooled, there are likely to be problems. One or both of you will need to meet the expenses of separating. There is also the issue of who contributed what. While "co-habitation" agreement detailing the money issues could be very helpful should things ever go wrong. Let's face it, vanilla, D/s or whatever, relationships end sometimes. All parties need to protect their resources for that time. Without being married, neither of you has any protection in the future. Even if the two of you stay together forever, without a marriage license or a will, one dies, the other gets NOTHING. A co-habitation agreement can also cover other issues that arise in situations like this. Medical treatment, etc. can all be addressed. 2. The other issue is to consider if you do have significantly different incomes. If one makes 100 grand a year, while the other makes 30 grand a year, is splitting household expenses equally fair? Once you know what your monthly shared expenses will be, figure out, based on income, how much each should contribute. With the above figures for example, the 30K earner would contribute about 23% of their income to the expenses and the 100K earner the remaining 77%. Then each is contributing equally based on their available income. I have also known couple who each take on the burden of particular bills. One pays the rent, the other the utilities, etc. The trick here is to make sure that you each your assets if things don't work out. Don't mean to be Ms. Negative about it, and all could very well work out, but without that marriage license all joint purchases have too much ability to become nightmares if they don't. Personally, I would be wary (dom or sub) handing over control of my finances to anyone in a relatively new relationship. Just some points to ponder...
|