mp072004 -> RE: Being treated like a sex object? (3/10/2007 8:01:30 AM)
|
I don't have photos up here. As a result, I don't get specific comments on my looks. From time to time, I do get contacts like, "I can tell that you are a very beautiful mistress and that's why I'm emailing you," which always amuses me, because the authors have no idea what I look like. I think that if you have attractive, somewhat sexy clothed shots, or even art or glamour nudes, it is entirely polite for someone to contact you for conversation and, as part of the initial email, remark on your beauty. Politely. Early and general compliments on my appearance don't generally make a person seem more attractive to me, but it's not rude for them to do so. If the comment isn't, "You're beautiful," but "Your big perky melons make my cock spurt gallons of man-juice," then we've crossed into rudeness. However, if you've got explicitly sexual nudes, especially as your initial photo, and if you don't want people looking at you as a sex object, I would urge you to consider a more modest self-representation. In face-to-face interactions, specifically at play parties, I find that ogling me makes me feel less like a sex object than unsubtle "please fulfill my fantasy" flirting. I can deal with being looked at, and complimented on my appearance (though interestingly, I've gotten more body-part-comments from women than from men), and it doesn't bother me. I imagine this is because I'm in control of it--I've chosen to dress as I've done, and I've acknowledged that my fellow guests have eyes, thus, it will not surprise me if fellow guests find me attractive. I've already engaged myself as much as I need to. But bad, too-explicit flirting, particularly flirting where my conversational partner doesn't try to make an argument for why I should find him attractive--that requires effort on my part, even if the effort is simply finding a graceful way to leave the conversation, and so that does bother me. Monica
|
|
|
|