Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Are Men Necessary??


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Are Men Necessary?? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 4/3/2007 2:34:40 PM   
justplainjava


Posts: 173
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
to be honest NO they are not necessary. we have scince to prove that, if we want a child a man goes in make is deonations and we go in get it planted and all is well no mess no fussy. and for sexual satisfaction they are not important since the inventions of certain toys, and with them there are no real problems if they break you replace them, once in while depending upon use you replace the batteries once again no muss no fuss, no tears, no rejection, no emontional ties simple and uncomplicated

(in reply to DanceDreaming)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 4/3/2007 2:36:58 PM   
michaelOfGeorgia


Posts: 4253
Status: offline
couldn't have said it better myself

LOL


_____________________________

Are we having fun, yet?

(in reply to justplainjava)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 7:57:25 AM   
JerryFrankster


Posts: 188
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TNstepsout

quote:


...without men, who would open the pickle jar?


You realize, of course, that most pickle jars were designed by men.

You might as well just say, "Without men, who would make jars of pickles."

(in reply to TNstepsout)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 8:06:02 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
Is resurrecting a 10-month-old thread on a topic that just got beaten to death really necessary?

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to JerryFrankster)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 8:16:08 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
I see you've noticed that, too.  There have been at least a dozen resurrections of old threads by new folks.  If you check the general discussion board, there's a thread going on about how (supposedly) rude people are if it's pointed out that there's no need to make pointless comments to old threads.  

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 8:19:42 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
Yeah, and did you notice his assumption that only Doms are "rude" to newbies, and lacking in self-mastery?  I mean, Jeez.  It makes me think.... very very seriously...... Are subs really necessary?


_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 8:41:58 AM   
AnkleStraps54


Posts: 10
Joined: 8/21/2005
From: Wales UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: justplainjava

to be honest NO they are not necessary. we have scince to prove that, if we want a child a man goes in make is deonations and we go in get it planted and all is well no mess no fussy. and for sexual satisfaction they are not important since the inventions of certain toys, and with them there are no real problems if they break you replace them, once in while depending upon use you replace the batteries once again no muss no fuss, no tears, no rejection, no emontional ties simple and uncomplicated


I am not too sure about this.... If we look at the science developing genetic engineering, IVF and cloning, etc it would appear that they are mostly men, they have the technology, the capital and the opportunity to reproduce humans (and notso humans) and maybe their overall plan is to get rid of women? The female body is no longer essential when we have fabulous penis shaped test tubes.

regards

shiaz

_____________________________

Yes I do know how I survive; yes I do know why I'm alive
To love and be with you, Day by day by day by day


(in reply to justplainjava)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 3:36:15 PM   
JerryFrankster


Posts: 188
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline
Oh tartarsauce, I meant to reply to a newer similar thread rather than this one. Not sure how that happened.  I don't think the post I replied to is even in this thread.

Methinks teh Intarweb has a mind of it's own.

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 3:41:09 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Fast reply:

Each sex is a luxury to the opposite sex.

_____________________________



(in reply to JerryFrankster)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 3:46:08 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Fast reply:

Each sex is a luxury to the opposite sex.


Are you 100% certain?


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 3:50:17 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
It goes without saying that it's not true for everybody.

_____________________________



(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 3:52:27 PM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

o be honest NO they are not necessary. we have scince to prove that, if we want a child a man goes


oops you proved yourself wrong  ;)


_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 3:57:17 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Dude! Pet peeve of mine these days: when someone does a fast reply and doesn't warn the previous poster of it; it looked as though you replied to me when you didn't.

It has the same effect as talking to someone without looking at them. Please!

Thank you  .

_____________________________



(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 4:03:15 PM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
wel if people read the posts..they know....you didn't say it  ;)  else I wouldn't even have bothered to quote

and I hate the word dude...so..next time I do it again :P

for those who don't read all....justplainjava has the copyrigth on the quote text....lets stop pannicing


_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/15/2008 4:11:54 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline

The brotherhood of myn now want to be known as myn and not men because men implies some association with the term women. The womyn stealing our new title of myn can go fuck themselves.


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/16/2008 12:06:31 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
lol I like that...but  "fuck themselfs".....mmmm  can't we do that as myn?  :P


_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/16/2008 4:23:55 AM   
hopelesslyInvo


Posts: 522
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: the future
Status: offline
*contributes to people's apparently unending desire in all forums to rant of "newbies" posting*

i never really cared to enter the forums much in the first place, but since the "recent forum posts" window caught my eye~

i'd probably have to read the book to understand the basis of this question (unlikely). but since most people are concerned and continue to debate on the question you put in the title of the thread rather than something indicative of what you intended to actually ask...

i don't see either gender, humanity, or existence of them or any other life as a necessity in and of itself, necessities always relate upon a function for something else. we need to eat "to survive", we need to shower "to be clean", but we don't need "to survive", and we don't need "to be clean". they are just idealistic intents. we don't need beauty, enjoyment, or kindness in the world, and we don't need and can't expect everyone to appreciate the value of such things. people believing in god or otherwise surely don't believe god to have created us because we needed to exist, rather than he apparently wanted to or was likely just bored. (though i think the bible states somewhere that he wanted to have people that loved him, but had the choice not to) those in belief of evolution wouldn't be displaying much understanding to its theory if they thought we "became human" in order to fill some sort of need in nature or survival. and the awesomely agnostic ones... i assume they question such things enough as is in their claim to not know what to believe since you can't prove any of the above.

in the interest of human reproduction, i believe there will always be a necessity to both sexes, and a need for this viewpoint, if we wish to continue call ourselves indeed, human. the "miracles" of science and medical practices have truly accomplished many things and brought happiness to people who weren't able to achieve it by conventional methods. but lets not forget what was "needed" to aquire such knoweledge, and where the "need" of learning such things even came from.

in the interest of relationships and sex, aside from the people who mention it sarcastically or lightheartedly, if you are only interested in pleasing yourself and are looking for empty satisfaction you're guaranteed to get from it, dissapating within seconds after it's over... a piece of plastic and a mirror to suit your narcissistic qualities might be the only needs you have. but if you are in the pursuit of something meaningful and/or truly rewarding, in and outside of the relationships that are involving of sex, perhaps you will afterall find yourself in "need" one of these genders. but perhaps even by classification of shallowness, the day cold plastic and firm rubber is perceived by my brain to feel better than the warmth and smoothness of living skin, or to have a more tender feeling, despite being completely lifeless, i might find myself a little more open to such things. until then, they're just aptly named "toys" to me, and i'd think even if you did prefer a vibrator, it's likely to be more stimulating to be weilded in the hands of a partner, but it is called a "substitute" for a reason. i suppose what warrants sexual satisfaction to a person will never cease to differ among others, but shouldn't people that prefer atificial satisfaction to the real thing be on adamandeve.com rather than collarme?

in the interest of war and all that jazz and viepoints, what is in people hearts is non-reliant upon their gender or behavior. men, women, and more importantly "individuals" are not defaulted to be more compasionate or understanding than others. the fact that the nature and tendencies of men or characteristic qualities seen from testosterone, bearing more more aggresive qualities, is acting as as a catalyst in most cases, and may surely and likely be cause for much of the hostility (or better put "resolve") and fighting in the actions we see. but if the world was only populated by women, though we might see a great decrease of warfare, (good luck proving it), simply the lack it or other actions would not change the state of affairs people live in, nor would it make or mean that the world is be a better place to live in. even if the world turned a little more smoothly, it would come at the cost of things such as humanity losing its identity, and people losing their individuality. you might as well replace all humans with robots or simply remove both genders, but what is the "need" for that either? saying however, that in an all female world, women wouldn't need men to open pickle jars because they're not going to be stupid enough to make something for themselves that isn't practical for their own uses is the best point i've seen made. besides that, if men were only good for or capable of such trivial things, the world would already populated by only the female gender, obviously that is not the case.

neither gender is a guaranteed to be a necessity in a relationship or to be happy, but if they were and if men or women were only filling in one of these roles because of an obligation, what's the point? i'm very glad for it not to be a necessity, it puts reason into our actions and meaning in the choices we make.

i'm in all rights and description submissive, but i do not "need" a dominant partner or the lifestyle and practices of BDSM "necessary" to satiate what others will call my "need to please or serve others". i can find the means to please and serve others regardless of who they are to me, regardless of if they demanded or even had to ask for it, and regardless of what these "things" that please someone else are. and i choose to do these things for others because of my values for others, not because some inescapable need meaninglessly forces me to. as simple as i stated in the first part, i need to eat "to survive", but i need to please "as a necessity to do what"?.. i need to please to make someone pleased? brilliant... i need to submit "because i need to?" isn't it all just self-service if the only reason you do it is to fill your own "needs"? i look at my incentives more backwards compared to most.

i need air "to breathe", and if i ever hope to make "her" happy, i need the means "to be able to please her". it's not i need to "submit to her desires", because i don't do this for myself, i need her desires "to submit to". such a case might be where i was fond or attracted to a lesbian, mistress or otherwise, but obviously i lack "the means to please her", and i can't submit to any of her desires, so obviously to profess "but i need to please you", would either mean it's about self service, or just about sex, but is either way superficial. if it was truly the goal to please, i could already have pleased her by shutting the hell up about my "needs" and leaving her alone.

last 2 paragraphs are sort of off topic, but are a good enough example in my attempt to say why men (and women) and our relations have never been a necessity, and hopefully never will be.

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/16/2008 4:48:23 AM   
Justme696


Posts: 3236
Joined: 1/7/2008
From: Royal kingdom of the Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

because i don't do this for myself, i need her desires "to submit to".


i think i know what you mean...but I think we all say more or less te same....in the end there are 2 choices for all...yes or no/agree or disagree.

even in your quote there is a contradiction... "i don't do this for myself"  versus "i need". Something you need is related to one self. But anyway...putting feelings and thoughts on paper is very hard......and that is why discussions happen on forums




_____________________________

~Been there, done that, got the t-shirt

(in reply to hopelesslyInvo)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/16/2008 4:53:32 AM   
Morghan


Posts: 99
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Laughable.   In my entire young life I was the peacemaker, and I abhor the kind of petty, thinly veiled manipulative behavior you describe as being something inherent to the female.  Both genders are quite capable of providing misery and pain, it is not your XX vs XY that makes you stable or not.  

(in reply to frostyslave)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Are Men Necessary?? - 2/16/2008 9:27:19 AM   
hoplesslyInVo


Posts: 3
Joined: 1/3/2008
Status: offline
most people i see seem to describe their disposition as simply i need to.  whether they're entirely sincere or not, or just never really stopped to think about their own feelings, if you asked them for the reason why they need to, they generally couldn't give you a real answer and would only repeat, because i need to.

anyway, needs always correlate to some sort of function, similar to cause and effect, one doesn't exist without the other.  and i don't consider me having my own needs, or simply admitting to their existence, to be in contradiction of my saying “i don't do it for myself”  saying i need her desires to submit to, is in context that, if she did not have any desires, how then could i ever do what is desired?  which is why the function a need serves is probably more in question that what the need itself is.  still, anyone who seeks to fulfill the wishes of another will share the same need, a genie cannot grant what you don’t wish for.  but think of other needs that are also inherent; a need of trust, a need of willingness, a need of understanding.   better exemplified in my meaning would be something such as this, a house is burning down and someone is trapped inside, you know... the typical hollywood sort of setup.  we all know what comes next, the fireman runs into the house, but does so for the sake of saving the victim, not for their own sake.  yet if they hope to save this person, there are several needs this person will need to meet.  they will need courage, they will need resolve, they will need ability, time, probably some assistance, and perhaps a bit of luck, but all of these needs are in regard to the function of "saving this persons life".  this act isn't committed because of the fireman’s own needs, but still has needs that must be met if it is to be accomplished, just as any other situation will.  still apparent, and yet not a need, the fire fighter obviously has the desire to save this person.  every voluntary action we take is affected by our desires, and thus carries motivations, but as with this example, the firefighters own desires and motivations are selfless, and while they are his needs, they are simply ones that will govern the success in saving this persons life.

i guess i'm just trying to say desires and needs are always present, but which ones are acted upon and much more importantly why, is what becomes indicative of their intent.  many people i think simply don't properly differentiate between a need and a desire.  desires spawn needs, and needs simply state what must be done to fulfill it.

i do not need to be alive; i want to be alive.  since i want to continue living i have needs to abide to if i wish carry out this desire.  i need water, i need food, i need oxygen, and i need shelter if i want to survive long.  those are my simple necessities, yet i want sweetened tea, a giant steak, fresh air, and a mansion with 3 floors, a basement, and a 20 acre yard encased in a 7 foot brick wall with one of those fancy iron-bar gates at the front of my cobblestone driveway.  i don't need those things, but since i want them and seek for it to happen, if i going to get them, i'm going to encounter more needs in able to attain them, mostly i need money, and obviously lots of it.  depending on how i want to go about acquiring this money, i'm met with yet only more needs in the means to this function.  if i choose to get a high paying career, i need a resume, i probably need a hell of an education, i might need new clothes, and i might need several references and connections.  these things all spawn more needs derived from the desires of how i want to go about attainting these.  if i want an education at a university, i might need a scholarship, or a lower paying job during my schooling to allow it.  so forth and so on it goes, new desires come to view, new needs are born, it never ends.

what i find conclusively misleading, is when people list their desires as wants.  saying i need fancy clothes is only truly a need when a function cannot be carried out otherwise, most people would say you don’t “need” fancy clothes, but are not looking at it with the correct function, but instead only use the function “to survive”.   obviously i don’t need fancy clothes to survive, but if i'm going to work as a lawyer, this is in fact a need.  typically only about 3 types of attire are seen in court rooms, formal wear, robes, and prison uniforms.  since i'm neither aspiring to be a judge or an inmate, i need a suit to satisfyingly fill this position, and not end up being kicked out because i was seen as a mockery to the court by wearing jeans and a wife-beater while presenting my case.   so in the case of so many people saying i "need to serve", the function it must follow will define it.  if i'm a waiter and table #2 wants pie, then i "need to serve" if i want a tip or to even keep my job.  if a mistress desires me to submit, then i "need to serve" if i wish to please her.  if i was one of the people that "need to serve" to get my jollys off, it's still a need defining the function, but obviously no longer carries any form of selflessness, and certainly is not the thinking of someone who is actually submissive.  a person that "needs to serve" to define who they are or have a better understanding of themselves and feel at peace from doing so, is certainly (in my opinion) not selfish, and i see nothing in the least wrong with it, as many dominants would be happy to help them explore it and find it rewarding, it’s not entirely selfless, but they don’t so often ever seem to claim it to is.  but after they’ve “found their place” that need will surely change and the function more defined, even if once again, they’re unaware or just don’t think about the reasons.  i generally just assume that to be the case with most "true" submissives that seem unable offer no other reason for their disposition other than to say "i simply need to submit".  i assume these needs are their own are reflect inward, but also fit the needs of another.   however the people that would say “i need to submit”, and would list the function as “because i like to please” are pretty obviously only really seeking to please themselves, hell’s frozen over and blah blah blah when submitting becomes the only way to please another.   none of that however, nor my submissive nature, are things i consider of any influence in the reasons that would cause me to offer my own submission.  surely as much as some wanker can offer their submission, in turnaround my submissive nature does not force my hand in actually submitting.  if it is desired, i simply have as you say to either make the choice or not, and if i agree i make it in regards to meeting the satisfaction of who would ask for it, not for myself.  to offer myself, and to submit to another simply in the aim to make myself a means to their happiness probably just sounds like a lot of hot air and big talk, (i don’t agree we all say “more or less the same thing”) and obviously despite it all, such a relationship is in many eyes likely to be very rewarding, and because of that, will be prone having others, possibly even the one i’m with assume or wonder if the rewards of my actions were my immediate and conclusive aspirations.  even if the reward of bringing enjoyment to someone else isn’t exactly thinking inward in my opinion. 

however, i simply must admit i have needs, that i myself must meet, if i am to ever expect to be able to satisfy the needs and desires of another.  i consider coming to terms with that standpoint to have been one of those needs itself, and more to the point, the satisfaction i receive in pleasing another, is simply not my motivation for pleasing them in the first place.

i'm really far off topic of a topic that's already off topic though, so unless for someone this helps add to my point of what i consider a necessity in the first place, sorry for the ranting and hijacking.

< Message edited by hoplesslyInVo -- 2/16/2008 9:28:08 AM >

(in reply to Justme696)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Are Men Necessary?? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093