thompsonx -> RE: Each of us faces 50 percent chance of poverty (3/16/2007 12:47:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: luckydog1 Thompson says,"There is noting in the article that even alludes to that conclusion. " Which is of course a lie. The article explictily states this conclusion. Its the second sentance. It is the finding of the researcher. Actually the second sentence is by Jenny Daley, the author of the article. Only the parts of the article in quotation marks are the words of the author of the study Mr. Hirschl. What does the next to last paragraph have to do with anything. The next to the last paragraph has his exact words and he points out several sailent factors about his conclusions. The paragraph above that has a rather telling opinion by Jenny Daley about factors that were outside the purview of the study. If you read the article it says that people can experience both Poverty and Affluence for at least one year of their life, and they have an equal likelyhood of both. The study was a statistical analysis of 4800 people. Your statement (which is the one I was disagreeing with) was that each of us has a 50% chance of wealth. Your statement is inclusive of all people in the U.S, His research was inclusive of only those in his study. Now apperantly you can't find anything to discredit the study, so you make a silly attack based on a direct lie. Must you persist in personal attacks. Do you not feel any compunction to discuss. I have not attempted to discredit the research. What I have done is point out what he said as opposed to what your interpretation seems to be. Are you off your Meds again? Nope...my meds are delivered to me by a uniformed emisary of the U.S, government. I am willing to share if it would help to get your underwear out of the bunch that they seem to be in. thompson
|
|
|
|