meatcleaver -> RE: What life experiences have shaped your political point of view? (3/24/2007 11:45:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dtesmoac No issues with the following? 1) British coal more productive than the US, German and French versions, but their governments looked after their workers and subsidised them. the article gave no evidence of this British deep mine coal was the most efficient in the world but could never be as cheap as coal dug in the slave working conditions of coal in Columbia or state subsidized Polish coal. 2) The NUM knew what was coming i.e. widespread pit closures, so they fought to save jobs. Where's the problem? If it was your industry would you just let your livelihood go down the swanny without a fight? . and your answer to the hunting fraternity, whaling communities, arms industries would be....what? The miners had held previous governments to ransom and tried it again..... that was my point about Scargil. Going on strike never saves jobs. The miners hadn't previously held governments to ransom. They spent ten years telling governments that they were being treated apallingly. The miners cracked when Heath having made the devasting inflationary decision to introduce decimal currency and then impose a wage freeze. There was an government inquiry after the strike of 1972, I forget the name of it at the moment but I have a copy in my bookcase and it has all the stats and found that the miners had been taken advantage of by successive governments. Holding the government to ransom is rightwing propaganda and Scargill was not the NUM President in 1972 or 1974. 3) The communities were left to rot with little to no regeneration. Aren't they suppoed to be a government of the nation i.e. all of us? The UK was rotting at that time. Regeneration funds are predominantly focussed on areas of deprevation, however there contiues to be a requirement for people that wish to work to move to chase the work. Some people will, others will not. You ignore the aspects that if ballots had been held, and if they were won then many of the hardship issues would not have arrisen The NUM wold not have been taken to court, the TUC would have supported the action, people would have received state benefits. There was no regeneration funds to talk about and EU money was refused by the government because it had to meet them pound for pound. There was some EU money for deprived areas but much of this was redirected south, the Major government was particularly guilty of this. As for ballots, there was no need for a ballot, the ballot was tory propaganda but as for scab county, the Nottingham Democratic Union of Mineworkers, we have all seen how good the tory's word to them was. 4) The phone tapping of Union leaders followed by propaganda and lies to discredit them. Fascism an easy word to use, don't cheapen it. It was a political attempt to topple a government. Scargil used the miners. Oh, if you lived in a mining area you would tend to use the word fascist for the British state apparatus. Arbitary arrests, arbitary beatings, road blocks stopping you from going about your lawful business. Withdrawal of local police and importing of southern police such as the metropolitan police which had the reputation for thuggery. Somehow they managed to break the arm of a 15 year old girl in my father's village and arrest an 82 year old man on charges of assault for trying to protect her, accidently beating him up and fracturing his skull in the process. Casual beatings by police was not uncommon. Of something like 243 miners arrest in South Yorkshire, all were found innocent at Sheffield Crown Court because police evidence was falsified and their statments were proved to be lies. The sequestration of Union money was a fascist act. Where is the democracy of robbing people of their only funds? Then after robbing people of their funds, denying them an social security (which would be fair enough if they hadn't robbed the union of legitimate funds). The government tried to starve the miners back to work. They tried to make their families suffer and weaken the strike that way. Then there were stories in the rightwing press of suitcases of cash being carried roiund like the mafia. Well if the money collected was put in a bank, the tory government would have it seized. What the strike did do, it made my father's generation realise the police really are a set of bastards and that the country doesn't belong to the people but to the establishment. The police still won't get out of their police cars where my father lives and still no one will cooperate with them, people sort their own problems out which isn't ideal but a legacy of the strike. The only jobs that have moved into the area are low paid jobs so drugs, guns and crime have moved in, the black economy is rife. The legacy of Thatcher is dishonesty and a repugnance of the state. However, you can make a good living if you are dishonest, especially in the import-export business. 5) I'll stand by my earlier post - it's easy to talk from afar, but did you read about miners begging, borrowing and stealing for a year with no pay or state support - kids and families to support. No income whatsoever? The bitterness and labelling of scab from one generation to the next, the subsequent assaults and deaths, it was some not all that backed the strikes. I have consideration for the families of those that subjected them to this but on the hole do not see it as some heroic crusade. There was nothing heroic about it and if a scab was on fire, I wouldn't piss on him to put him out and I still wouldn't. I still laugh my head off when I think of scab county and the tories closing down their mines. They learnt how good a tory's word is the hard way. Thatcher made a dishonest country of Britain and not just in regard to the miners strike. The City of London is full of theives and chancers, my ex used to work there and was amazed at what people got away with which was basically gambling and stealing other people's money. Hell. I promised myself I wouldn't post while I'm being Moderated but I had to answer this post.
|
|
|
|