farglebargle
Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005 From: Albany, NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967 They should pull a Clinton and plead the fifth, like so many of the previous administration did. subrob1967: It would appear that the white houses requirement for non sworn and non recorded testimony would allow for that very thing. The question that begs being asked is why would they want their testimony to be non sworn and non recorded ? It sounds to me like "I don't want to talk to you folks but if I have to I don't want to have to tell the truth and I don't want anyone to know what I lied about" Your buddy Clinton had to testify under oath so why should'nt these thugs? thompson The point of the article I linked to is that it's irrelevant what the White House wants, if they don't come to the Senate and testify under oath Schumer's going to subpoena them on Thursday. You said, "I'll believe it when I see it". I agree. That's the beauty of Sworn Testimony. It's either Credible or Perjury.
_____________________________
It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show. ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים
|