RE: Anti-porn law faces major setback (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Anti-porn law faces major setback (3/23/2007 7:43:13 AM)

Yanno, when I was a kid I found my dad's playboys and pulp sex magazines and really, it never done me no harm, I am norm------------

Errrrrrrrrrrrr-------never mind

Ron 




Vendaval -> RE: Anti-porn law faces major setback (3/23/2007 10:05:34 AM)

Doh!  There went the ice water!  ROFLMAO!
[sm=biggrin.gif]




puella -> RE: Anti-porn law faces major setback (3/23/2007 10:09:24 AM)

You didn't realize that Ron was celibate too?  hehe




Vendaval -> RE: Anti-porn law faces major setback (3/23/2007 10:13:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

THEY KNOW the Victorias Secret catalogue is put out of reach, but who would think it ? Who would keep the Sears catalogue from their children ? Their Parents think they are looking at toys, or even better, tools. But no, they are loking at smut, pandered to young children by these, these, insert your own adjective.

I have friends who got their earliest idea of what women's bodies are like from Sear's
and JC Penny's bra and panty sections in their catalogues. 
Plus they had access to their parents staff of "National Geographic"
that had topless women and men with no pants!
 
How about those Barbie dolls?  Aerodynamic tits and all plus
a boyfriend Ken doll.  Imagine the afternoon pornographic
poses and bondage games!
 
Those smut peddlers back in the days, I'm a tellin' ya!







Vendaval -> RE: Anti-porn law faces major setback (3/23/2007 10:15:09 AM)

Well, he is a bit of a CM celebrity!  [8D]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125