wwwkevinww
Posts: 276
Joined: 7/15/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thetammyjo quote:
ORIGINAL: VelvetIronTouch I like a lot of that post, but I do have issue with one part. quote:
That consent, as much as you may wish for it to be otherwise, does not disappear and does not lose value regardless of the years you have together. I have to say that yes, it absolutely can change. Just as love can change. Relationships can begin very well and then die. It happens. That goes for vanilla and double-chocolate-mocha-grande-muddy-sneakers-D/s. People have epiphanys all the time, people just suddenly change who they are and what they want all the time, often because they never really did know who they were, or because they convinced themselves they wanted something else. If someone pledges their submission to you Today, and then five years down the road that changes, you have to let it change, you have to let them go, if they need to. I don't think I expressed myself clearly if you think I meant that things don't change. Some people believe that once consent is given it is unimportant anymore. I was trying to say that consent is always an issue, it is always there, you may not specifically think of it as consent anymore but the ability to consent or not is a factor forever in my experience and strong opinion. Each of us decides every day, consciously or not, to consent to the relationship, to do an action, or to express our thoughts. I believe that everyday my slave consents to be my slave and I consent to be his owner. We can withdraw that consent at any time. If the other denies our right to consent or not, then they have stepped out of the consensual relationship into something most societies consider a crime. If that happens we shouldn't be surprised if the other person goes to legal authorities and complains. Alot of what you say here has alot of merit and I have to agree with. But to play devil's advocate, say someone is poor/uninsured and needs a way to get off drugs they had chosen to get on, and needs to be tied up etc. They sign a binding contract to help with this, consensually, then they are pretty stuck to the contract, because obviously when they are being bound and fighting and no longer coherant, and the drugs are speaking and not them, then its no longer a question of what they want or need, but what is in their best interest. I guess in legal terms it would be giving up your own guardianship of yourself. Obviously this would have its own legal ramifications....and goes into alot about contractual law. I think its possible to create a legal contract that is binding and forces someone into a 24/7 situation for at least a temporary period of time. I don't think its very legal to try and do anything beyond a temporary period of time contractually, although supposedly marriage contracts try to do this..... If a woman marries a guy and is forced to provide some sexual gratification to the guy by the marriage contract (yea, they call it con-jungal rights) - which takes precedence - if the woman decides one night she doesn't want to....after 2 weeks, she still doesn't want to? she's breaking the contract...obviously he shouldn't rape her and respect her saying no, but with her obviously breaking the marriage contract I'm guessing she should also get diddly squat in the divorce.... I think trust is the most important aspect, and goes hand in hand with consensuality. Its in everyone's best interest in a relationship to be as honest as possible - its better to get divorced/end the relationship than go postal.... I'd make sure that a submissive would know that if she ever tried to slander me how that would end up. I'm honest that if a woman hits me and actually hurts me(intentionally non-consensually), I will hurt her back. I'm not going to be a punching bag and don't expect her to be either. I don't know, each relationship is different, and have met people in the lifestyle who were punching each other in the face as part of their play. To each his own.....
|