happypervert -> RE: Dom's and sub's (4/13/2005 9:59:39 AM)
|
quote:
P.S forgive me happy, if I have misinterpreted your response. heh, you hardly need to be forgiven for being so nice and diplomatic that you put a positive spin on my smart-assed remarks, angel. So I'll thank you instead. Rather than suggesting the search feature, though, I was really trying to point out that it's a good idea to lurk a while and read back a way in the posts to get a feel for the place and personalities before posting. I recall lurking a month and reading back another month before deciding to run my mouth here; that's probably overkill, but I didn't think I had anything so brilliant to add that there was reason to rush in, and that it would be wiser to wait for an appropriate opportunity to jump in. That's very different than the approach of Fred and some others; although he claimed to have "been here for a few weeks", it was obvious he hadn't or else he would have seen at least one previous e-mail thread. Also, I noticed that with all the threads in these forums, Fred had nothing to say anywhere else; he only started two e-mail threads here in the Ask a Submissive" section. The first initially gave the appearance of soliciting comments about e-mail Manners though it was really just a thinly disguised "I think you all should send a polite reply to my notes" type of post we see so often. Then he started this thread without even pretending to ask for anyone else's ideas; it was simply the unsolicited "wisdom" of MasterFred. I figured he was just trolling trying to impress the gals, and so I poked fun of the most self-inflating line from a post full of them to see how he would respond. Of course, I expected that his response to me would reveal the sort of foolishness that Archer has since provoked him into expanding on. So that about sums up the intent of my response above. However, I will confess that I lied a bit -- I really wasn't considering the notion that he could be admired for his initiative. I just said that for fun and to try and make myself sound like less of an obnoxious bastard. By the way, I like your font -- it's stylish and has a character that seems to fit your writing style. However, if you ever change it to something really horrid like big pink block letters, then I'll probably have to deprive myself of the pleasure of reading your ideas because it will be overwhelmed by the torture of being assaulted by such a hideous font.
|
|
|
|