kyakitten
Posts: 145
Joined: 11/21/2004 Status: offline
|
All good points and I don't disagree that caution is warranted in general. I just have doubts about whether the story we're getting about this guy's behavior is the full picture. His not following orders could have happened because he didn't speak English well enough (yes, he's a citizen of Australia, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything, and his name appears to be Asian.) The most damning other information we got from the media is that he was wearing black and his suitcases were black. Well, obviously then his intentions were evil! (Memo to real terrorists: consider stylish plaids.) Depending on what media you read, he either asked or "demanded" to see the President. Many, many tourists ask to see the President. Those who don't speak English well may even be trying to ask how to view the White House. The Capitol Building is beautiful. Is it out of the question that a tourist from another country - let's speculate, an architect or artist, perhaps - might stand and stare at it? In fact, it happens all the time. Then there's the location/logic disconnect. Wouldn't any terrorist who took the time to build a bomb to blow up the President at least bother to find out what building he's in before dragging his bomb-filled bags to the wrong place? I'm suspicious because we're talking about a police state that banned TWEEZERS on airplanes for the better part of a year or longer (all while ignoring much greater risks). Talk about misreacting! We're talking about an administration with a proven record of excessive force and disrespect for individual rights. We're talking about a media much of which has been blithely and even deliberately publishing patent misinformation provided by this administration. Whether this guy proves to be a terrorist or harmless stooge, every time an individual's rights are trampled on we need to question the heck out of it. And for me in this case, the burden of evidence had not been satisfied. Even though he was wearing black.
|