SusanofO
Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005 Status: offline
|
Uh-huh. I agree. Or who have over-sized egos and like spouting off on television, about whatever they get paid to spout off about, regardless of whether or not it makes sense (or is sometimes probably even researched, at all.) My burning question, really, though, is: Why hasn't there been more tv coverage of the dilemma of who the real father is, of Anna Nicole-Smith's baby? I am truly feeling robbed by the lack. I can't imagine the networks being so remiss in not including more coverage about this problem, which is so obviously crucial to so many people around the globe. I wanna job as a tv news program director. If I got one, I'd promise to try to find some real news. I am thankful though, for the Discovery channel, and CNN, and the Food network and the Travel and History channels. But maybe,as far as some of the tv "news" cable networks (especially FOX, IMO), if they don't want to pay for a better program director, they could just have people around the U.S. call in about the real news happening where they live, and give away prizes for the best weekly story, or something? There must be a solution to this dismal "news" programming, as of late. I simply cannot bear many more evenings with re-hashed "news"about Anna Nicole's poor baby's fate, on the so-called cable "news" channels. - Susan
< Message edited by SusanofO -- 4/7/2007 12:19:41 AM >
_____________________________
"Hope is the thing with feathers, That perches in the soul, And sings the tune without the words, And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson
|