WhipTheHip -> RE: What I find hard to understand. (4/12/2007 4:34:52 PM)
|
This is my last post on this subject, since people here are less interested in understanding what I am actually saying than in attacking like a swarm of mindless killer bees. > Okay WhiptheHip, you have made a bunch of assumptions about those > that have been abused No I haven't. I have not made a single assmption. > but have you ever stood in those shoes? You can help others without ever having been in their shoes. I've talked to enough survivors to know how they feel. > Have you had true and total fear for your life at the hands > of another? I don't experience fear. > I am talking about having someone hold your life in their > hands not knowing if they are going to step over that line > or not? Actually, I have had this happen many times, but I don't see the relevance. > Have you ever been at the wrong end of a weapon held by > someone who claims to love you? No, but I have often been at the wrong end of a weapon held by lunatics who claim to hate me and want me dead. But I don't understand the relevance of this question. You are asking me a lot of questions whose relevance to this discussion I do not see. > Everyone has different life experiences and different > reactions to things. Right. Therefore we should throw out all medicine. Is this what you are saying? > To assume ***ALL*** that have been abused feel anger and > want revenge is incorrect. I ***NEVER*** made this assumption. When people don't like what other people say, instead of disputing their position they exaggerate and distort it. The easiest way to do this is to add the word "all" or "every" to their position. This ususally turns a reasonable statement into one that is silly and false. Why people on the internet do this over and over again is beyond me. I guess since people can't attack what others actually say they are forced to engage in intellectual dishonesty and attribute to others extreme statements and positions of their own making that were never expressed. When people mistate your position over and over again, I can only conclude they are not really interested in the truth. They are so emotionally distraught they can't think straight, and feel compelled to invent all kinds of nonsense. The one thing they can't do is actually confront the true position set forth by the person who is trying to communicate with them. It is easier to communicate with an ant than get a neo-Nazi with a 180 IQ to understand racism. When people don't want to accept something their brains will work overtime to not understand what others are really saying. > I am sure there are those who feel that way and channel those feelings > into their kink but I can tell you a large number do not. So we are in complete agreement. Haliluja. > Some of us are better than to let hate and revenge rule our lives. This is very self-righteous of you. Some survivors can't control their emotions because they were fragile and their trauma great. Finally, I did not advocate true revenge. But as long as you can confuse the issue why not do so, right? > We are stronger and more intelligent than to blame ourselves > for the shortcomings of our previous spouses/lovers/friends/S.O. > We survive and move forward. So now you are attacking survivors who are weaker and less intelligent than you, who find they have trouble surviving, and have trouble moving forward. You are a very brave, courageous person to do this. You are so much better than these other less intelligent, weaker survivors. > I would never, ever, channel anger into play. And this I suppose makes you a superior peson. I feel an ego ready to burst at the seems. > Nothing makes a traumatic event go away I've said this about a dozen times, myself. It's funny you don't address the other thing I said. Did your brain just black-out when it read the rest this sentence? I wrote several times: Nothing makes the traumatic event go away, there is no cure, but certain things can help. Why is it always black and white with you folks? If it doesn't make the trauma go away it has no value. This is your false implication. What other point would there be to making such an obvious statement? > but the past is the past. It cannot be changed or > altered but can be overcome. My point exactly! Now you are stealing my words. > Don't make such obtuse assumptions about so many people because you are terribly wrong. You are the one who has made an obtuse assumption. You are the one who is terribly wrong. But hey, this is a free country, and you can believe what you like. You want to say I advocate killing all Danes, that is your prerogative. I like Danes. I made no comment about so many people. You just concocted this in your head. Or you terribly misinterpreted something I wrote. I am finished with this thread because in post after post I have been accused of saying things I never said. The fact is people on the Internet do this all the time. I guess they do it because they can't dispute something another person said that rankles them to the core. Hence they feel compelled to distort the other person's position. They don't even bother to ask the other party what they meant. They just concoct wild statements and willy-nilly attribute them to whoever they choose. How would you like if I asked you to defend some silly offensive statement you never made?
|
|
|
|