CDOM3
Posts: 15
Joined: 2/22/2007 Status: offline
|
In a brief exchange of messages the other day, the word 'love' came up. A girl mentioned that the word is seldom used. Over the years it has been, is and I have little doubt that sub/slaves have, do and will continue to aggressively use the word love. This lifestyle tears away the accepted bounds of 'prpoer' behaivor. The physical, mental and emotional need to surrender and the right to expose these most primal of needs, drives the sub/slave to bare her body yes but also her heart and mind, to feel, live, regail in the shear blissful passion of her very soul. The want, need and desire to be loved so overwhelmingly, so completely, so intimatley that to not say the word, express her heart felt love in words, would be to deny the very purpose she is for - to serve for pleasure. What Dom or Master does not long to hear those words. 'i love you Sir.' For many, it is the final piece of the puzzle. The completion of the act of owning, controling. It is the purpose of the sub/slave to give, surrender their all. But it also occured to Me that is it also not the purpose of the Dom or Master to give Their all in owning? Yes in arrangged scenes and sessions, specific wants and needs are addressed and fulfilled and their is a conditional love shared but the love that I'm referring to here is the love of the heart of the sub/slave that surrenders. Now understand that I am 'Old School' so perhaps a different perspective. It is a Dominant or Masters duty of Responsibility to protect and provide for all of the sub/slaves needs. When we touch, we touch more then the body. The sub/slave offers themselves, all of themselves that they are capable of, for service and pleasure. While I don't believe it would be considered cruel abuse, perhaps it would be viewed as use to expand the sub/slave's capabilities, her limits and teach her extended service and thus more enjoyable pleasure without nurturing and cherishing her most precious gift, the love of and from her heart. It is one of the perhaps commonly accepted practices that Dom's or Masters are not to show emotions. Bullocks! If a Man spreads, excites and arouses a girl to the peak of her sensual/sexual passion so that she is pleasing in her response and then taken with unbounded lust, that certainly is emotional passion. If it is acceptable to express this then why not the simpliest of words in loving aftercare. 'I love you My little sub.' It most definately not a sign of weakness but I also acknowledge that many Dom's anf Masters enter this lifestyle to NOT to have to deal with this emotion. The control of NOT having to open their heart. The control of owning anothers heart without the responsibility of protecting it. What does love have to do with it?
|