LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
This is something I've wanted to ask for a while, so here goes. In the UK, we elect our local government and those elected then go off and run things without further reference to us, for a period of a few years. To me, this system is not a great deal of good since we end up with one party in control, ignoring what is often the majority who didnt vote for them or their policies. What does get done, seems to get done for those in areas who vote for the ruling party whilst others problems are ignored. And generally speaking, the ruling party would still be elected to a majority and run the place, even if its policies were genocidal, because of unthinking voters who choose based on family tradition or some other grounds unrelated to the issues and policies. In the US, from what I pick up from TV shows at least (!), things operate a bit differently in that you have more regular voting by way of referenda on issues and policies regarding them. Is this correct please? Do you also elect local government representatives? If so, what do they do, assuming things get decided on local ballots in the way I understand, rather than being decided by your elected representatives alone? I'm asking this because the sort of system I understand to be in place in the US seems much better to me than the system we have here - and everyone must by now know that I'm hellbent on running the UK one day. Does it work for you though? How would you rate it in terms of getting things done? Any other comments about it are also welcome. Thanks E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|