RE: "Comparable intelligence" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


imthatacheyouhav -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/23/2007 10:27:26 PM)

quote:

Ugh. I'd beg to differ. I, and most of the women in my aquaintance, will admit to loving big, attractive men that can just take you. But nine out of ten of them will say that if a man can't get their brain going it just isn't that much fun. Besides, to me most of a good fuck is in my mind and how I perceive it. If I feel dominated, I am, even with a physically smaller man when I'm on top. If I don't feel dominated, I'm not, even with a linebacker that has me bent over and chained up.


What she said.




fairerthanshe -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/23/2007 10:32:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: imthatacheyouhav

quote:

Ugh. I'd beg to differ. I, and most of the women in my aquaintance, will admit to loving big, attractive men that can just take you. But nine out of ten of them will say that if a man can't get their brain going it just isn't that much fun. Besides, to me most of a good fuck is in my mind and how I perceive it. If I feel dominated, I am, even with a physically smaller man when I'm on top. If I don't feel dominated, I'm not, even with a linebacker that has me bent over and chained up.


What she said.



Yeah, what she said...

Intelligence is the key for me - moreso than the physical attraction.  It helps but isnt paramount in my view.  I would much rather be with someone who stirs my passions first mentally  before he ever touches my body.

well wishes,

fairer than she




TreSwank -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/26/2007 2:13:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: fairerthanshe


Yeah, what she said...

Intelligence is the key for me - moreso than the physical attraction.  It helps but isnt paramount in my view.  I would much rather be with someone who stirs my passions first mentally  before he ever touches my body.

well wishes,

fairer than she



I'm glad that there are a few women in the BDSM women that value cerebral fellas. 

Unfortunately, my empirical research into the field of "pussy-catching" (forgive me, girls), has taught me to react to women counter-intuitively in matters of the "heart" and loins.  When a gal says that she's lookin' around for a "smart, sensitive guy with a sense of humor", the only thing that believe really applies is the "sense of humor."  My successes have usually been the result of "dumbing it up" and not getting out on too much of an abstract plane with girls.  If intelligence was sexy to most folks, Mensans would be the universal sex symbols, and women would scour libraries looking for throbbing scholar cock, as opposed to the current reality, involving  guys with nice cars, and/or big muscles traipsing about with sweet lookin' eye candy.

I've got so many intelligent friends who have trouble getting laid on a regular basis, because, despite their mental prowess, they don't understand that you have to project a certain vibe to attract sexual advances.  Every fish in the sea claims to be searching for a "kind and intelligent Mr. Right", but you've got to look at the kind of men that the ladies are paying attention to and realize that good intentions don't pan out to concrete reality 95% of the time.

Oh well; it is what it is, and it ain't nothin' else!




Griswold -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/26/2007 5:31:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OedipusRexIt

With a nod to the posters on the writhing, gasping "intellect" thread, let me pick up on a good thought/question:

In a partner, do you seek intelligence on par, higher or lower than your own?

Higher.

What significance do you attach to the answer?

All significance.




SunNMoon -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/26/2007 5:46:16 PM)

I need a partner which is about on par with me in intelligence. Along with a similar amount of education. It’s just something I need to make me happy.




Sinergy -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/26/2007 8:31:35 PM)



I just watched an interview with the First Lady.  The thread "comparable intelligence" makes complete sense now.

So lovely to see those who find the other half of their intellectual set of book-ends, so to speak.

Sinergy




Asraii -> RE: "Comparable intelligence" (4/26/2007 8:39:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

I cannot see how any close relationship can work if there is a gross disparity in basic intelligence.
I suppose some intelligent people may like a much less intelligent partner, but not many I think.

For instance if I only think about Football and sex and my partner likes politics, art and sex; she likes to listen to the news and current affairs programmes I like soaps; she knows where to put a semi colon in a sentence while when I hear the word colon all I can think about is her butt, would the relationship work ?



I actually laughed at what you said here.
 
My first relationship was with a man whose idea of a good time was having friends over to watch sports while they drank beer and cooked out. At the time, I hated sports of any kind, and I did not drink.
 
My idea of a good time was going to the musuem and talking about art, history, or reading a good auto-biography.
 
Yet, despite this, we meshed in every way possible and managed to keep each other amused for a long time [8D]
 
I don't think intelligence; in the way that most speak of it in this thread; has much to do with whether or not two or more people can have, keep, and maintain a relationship.
 
Just because one does not have knowledge about a certain subject does not mean that you can not have a meaningful discussion with them about 'said' subject.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125