Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
selfb; You sound like someone who knows economics quite well. I don't want to hijack the thread but I have a question. This is a bit off thread, but I am quite curious. I have my own theory, and the eye I cast on the stock market is quite derisional. But that is not the subject. Stocks, bonds, investments, all notwithstanding. Real property. Now to actually isolate this is not as easy as it seems, but it can be done. The theory : If you completely isolate market forces and any changes from the valuation of real estate, you can get a true picture of the value of a dollar. I realize what this means and I know it is not easy. I mean even with a dollar-stable market value for the oceanfront property in AZ, when nothing has changed and it is a remote location, values can fall do to declining interest in purchasing it. To get the clear view of it you must also disclude positive market factors, such as the horizontal expansion of urban areas. The closer they get, the more you get. I dunno how much you're into math, but by disclude I mean to negatively factor in positive influences on the property value. Like I said it is not easy, but I bet someone is doing it. Look what happened in Telluride, Colorado. What I am saying is that if we can see the PURELY intrinsic dollar value of a property increase for no good reason, what we are really seeing is the decline of the currency. I said this is not easy, there are offsets for natural disaster, all kind of crap. The list is almost endless. This is probably in the realm of the best actuaries in the world. However, my plans tend to be quick and dirty. I would now submit the theory that if we can isolate the factors with the most impact on the answer we seek, we can learn something. There will always be an error factor, and sometimes instead of trying to eliminate it, all we need to do it identify it. Of course that logic requires people to look for possible new influences before they have a chance to act. Not to stop them, but to adjust our tactics. New influences are very unlikely to be under our control, that is a given. But I remember the song "I'm addicted to a dollar that ain't worth a dime". Actually a dollar is worth about a nickel, ½ a dime, and probably less now. That was like 2002. So here's the deal, they used to say another day another dollar. If the dollar was worth a dime, you would have to make how much ? But then it is not worth that much anyway. I was the proud owner back in 1975 of a car that cost $9,983 in 1970. I knew because the crass ass left the sticker in the window. Now to isolate the intrinsic value for that car is not that desirable to persue, rather let's isolate it in relation to a new car. Given the times and the advancement of tchnology of course one expects new features. In line with the times, well air conditioning was standard on the 70. How much is $10,000 in 1970 dollars compared to today's dollars ? So you see the dilemma, which way do you think into this, from this side or that side ? The point is, ON topic actually, that I do not necessarily see the Dow increase as a good thing. T
|