Padriag -> RE: Old Guard Women? (4/29/2007 9:07:30 AM)
|
While there are groups who do have organized training regimens, and some of those probably can trace legitimate and direct connections to an "old guard" heritage... I still wouldn't pay it much attention. The reason is simple, none of use really knows what that means. Trained to do what? Qualified to do what? Experienced with what? Those are all open questions and until you have answers, despite claims of "old guard" training, you still don't really know anything about this person, how competent they may be, how reliable, etc. When I hear people laying claim to being Old Guard or some other such "heritage" I tend to get a little suspicious of them right away. People who feel a need to associate with such things may be trying to give themselves credibility they don't otherwise have. The easiest way for someone to really "prove" what they know how to do is by simply doing. Want to know how well someone can swing a whip before you play with them, ask them to demonstrate with some paper targets on a wall, etc. If someone claims they know how to do Shibari, ask them to show you with a doll and some string, someone who really knows how can. Ability talks... bull shit walks... simple. It really doesn't matter who trained whom to do what. In most cases you can't verify that so as far as "proving" anything, its pretty much useless. These days my usual response to someone who claims to have been trained by anyone (groups, previous owners, etc.) is "That's nice, but what can you show me?" Its amazing how many it immediately shuts up.
|
|
|
|