Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 6:12:48 PM   
darlingjade


Posts: 54
Joined: 1/31/2005
Status: offline
In walks the Devils Advocate.

Am I up front about my expectations concerning LTR? Yep, and the spiel goes something like this "What I like to tell my friends is that if they ever hear that I've gotten married to call the police IMMEDIATELY because obviously someone has been holding a gun to my head". I then go on to explain that I've never been one of those women that viewed a wedding band as the Holy Grail of womanhood. In fact I got married after three years and about 50 proposals to shut my ex up. My bad.

Usually that's when I explain my thoughts about the relationship being the most important thing to me. If we hit it off and it lasts 25 years that would be great. If we hit it off and it lasts a year that's still great because I'll take what I've learned and be a better person/sub/woman for it.

Interestingly enough my attitude seems to throw men off. Am not sure why, maybe because it's unusual. At any rate, believe it or not, I've had to end would be relationships before they really got started because the Dom just couldn't quite believe it.

Um, and as it happens, I'm one of the women that's managed to walk away from a marriage with basically nothing. Gave my ex everything that we'd aquired while together. Were there special circumstances? Yep, but I'd done basically the same thing in the only other previous relationship that I'd had up until then.




(in reply to RiotGirl)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 6:47:23 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
quote:

jail would be a better option. M

Based upon national statistics, the average jail time served for the murder of a spouse is 12-15 years. So remember, if those many years ago, you killed the person versus married them, you'd be free now.

Oh Lord, who let evil Merc in with the bad advice? M


_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/5/2005 6:49:07 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

As for your being a man, what you do in your boudoir is none of my biz.


With this figure, I can't even dream of passing as a man! Closest thing I can get is when I strap on an appendage ;)

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/6/2005 12:23:41 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika
quote:

As for your being a man, what you do in your boudoir is none of my biz.

With this figure, I can't even dream of passing as a man! Closest thing I can get is when I strap on an appendage ;)
- LA

That's exatcly what I meant, though wasn't going to say it.
You just had to get the strap on boys drooling with desire. M

_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/6/2005 3:06:51 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika
quote:

As for your being a man, what you do in your boudoir is none of my biz.

With this figure, I can't even dream of passing as a man! Closest thing I can get is when I strap on an appendage ;)
- LA

That's exatcly what I meant, though wasn't going to say it.
You just had to get the strap on boys drooling with desire. M


Hey. I'm a sadist. Torturing boys is what I do ;)

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/6/2005 3:45:17 PM   
BeachMystress


Posts: 2156
Joined: 4/3/2004
From: Naples Island- Long Beach CA - Southern California
Status: offline

Personally, I'm a commitment phobe. For me, marriage is for life and not something to do on a whim or with someone you don't intend to stick with forever, so I've never done it. I've never met anyone prior to my fiancee that I could imagine being with 20 years from now. Five years . yes, ten years.. maybe. But with the way personalities work and the way people change over time, how can you stand there and say to death do you part with just anyone? When a guy started making marriage noises I'd get antsy. I'd no problems with a long term relationship or even in one case, living with someone, but try to get any more serious with me than that and I'd bolt. Not everyone who dreads marriage is male. Now that I'm engaged, I have periodic panic attacks. They're happening less often as time goes on, but.. I'll never bag on a male for having trouble committing. It's scary!

I never had a problem being in a relationship, though. Matter of fact. I insisted upon it. Since I am sexually active with my sub, it is imperative that my piece of tail not be nestling between any other legs. With as rare as Domme are, we generally get what we seek in the relationship department as long as we understand our own needs and stick to them.


_____________________________

Beach Mystress
*Do not threaten the weak. Intimidate the strong. ~ Stevenson*
http://beachmystress.jigsy.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/beachmystress/

(in reply to infyniti)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/6/2005 9:47:46 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

"Scares people"? I think you meant to say it scares men. For many pragmatic reasons it should. There is no equality of the sexes in divorce settlements. In California at least, regardless of any change in the financial situation of the man, until death or until some other poor sucker comes along, the ex is "entitled" to a monthly stipend. Add children to the equation and, in effect, the man is working so his ex and kids can live in the manner that he was stupid enough to make for them in the first place. Of course if the female is a convicted felon or a drug addict, MAYBE he can get custody or more liberal visitation rights.



Hey Merc. You forgot something there. What about the mothers who GET NOTHING from the fathers? no alimoney, no child support, NO monthly stipend? What about Men who refuse to Take CARE of THEIR KIDS. What you dont realise that even MEN who are clever enough can get out of anything. Even the things they should be responsible. for.

Or the Men who marry women who make more money then them, who RAISE their standard of living?

i take offense to the statement above as a kid whose father did nothing for my support and a kid who saw their mother raise a MAN above his station. Have you any idea whats it like for a a mother with a small kid to make it out there? When a Husband has provided support and a mother took care of house. With no skills. Wnat me to tell you what its like for a mother to disapear for GOD knows how long so she can manage to support those kids? Or to move across the country to her parents so she can survive? Or to have a mother who worked around the clock JUST because A MAN wouldnt support his kids? You wanna know what happens when those ex's get nothing? My mother was married to my father long enough to entitle her to his military retirement and yet she got nothing. Want to know whats it like to raise yourself cos you're mother is trying to support you and your father is all the way across the country?

yeah i take great offense.

IF men would just take responsiblity for the creatures they spawned. Kids would be better off these days.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/6/2005 9:54:58 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

I'll direct their focus to one thing, failure may be the fault of both or either partner, but in 99% of the cases the man pays for the failure.



Maybe its just me, being a child of two divorces. BUT GOD people when will anyone wake up and realise that the people that PAY for the failure is the damn kids? God when people talk about divorce, do they ever step back and wonder what the consquences for the kids will be? A family is a kids stability, its their life. Does anyone know that kids of divorce have a higher statstics of god knows how many things. Drug use, suicide to name two.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/7/2005 8:51:51 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
Riot,

The tangent of men's fear of commitment and divorce convoluted the point made. My post was a rationalization to why men may shy away from commitment. It did not consider the all encompassing results of failure to live up to a commitment once one was made. Children, their emotional, mental, and financial well being SHOULD be reconciled, I just didn't get into it because it wasn't the subject.

As stated in my first quote on this thread...

quote:

quote:
DISCLAIMER: This opinion speaks in generalizations. It is NOT intended to be taken in absolute, nor are exceptions consider impossible. Anecdotal conversations with woman illustrate to me that generally; "MEN ARE SLIME". They abandon their wives and babies, drink, take drugs, and generally shirk their responsibilities.

That said, I have pre-drilled holes in my hands and feet and gotten my old heavy cross out of storage and am fully prepared for the crucifixion to come.


Shirking responsibility by either gender is a crime. beth has a similar story in her past regarding her kids to the one you recounted. I am sensitive to the situation. I apologize for offending you.

(in reply to RiotGirl)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/7/2005 12:59:54 PM   
mstrj69


Posts: 295
Joined: 5/27/2004
Status: offline
While I acknowledge both spouses are responsible for the financial support of the children, it has not been addressed as to the men who are making half, or less than what the wife is yet still have to pay almost all their paycheck for the support of the child as the court did not look at the income of the mother when computing total need vs wants of the children.
And since I am posting, aren't we a bit off topic here as to the LTR desires between subs and Doms or Domme's. While I have no problem with a commitment to a sub and feel it is necessary for the relationship to work, that might just be because of my age and my being financially secure. I do think if the wants as to a LTR were spelled out in the profile their might be fewer responses but those who did respond would be more compatible. Some responses are more concerned, in their discussions with is there agreement as to the kink wants that they forget about the fact a LTR is not just kink and the entire area must be discussed.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/8/2005 11:21:03 AM   
MzRounder


Posts: 10
Joined: 5/1/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BobcatsLilMinx
So now we both have very real expectations if where we'll be in 10 years time, and can enjoy the "now" without having to worry if our long term dreams will conflict with each other.
Minx


Exactly! LTR *doesn't* mean the same to all, and you can avoid so many problems and assumptions by making your long term goals known ahead of time.

I think I am going to adopt this from Lady Angelika as my personal goal: ;)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

I'm having fun being single in terms of committed relationships with a harem of boys.

- LA



(in reply to BobcatsLilMinx)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. - 5/9/2005 11:46:20 AM   
Emmmrld


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/21/2005
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Status: offline
I'm not the "normal" woman by any sense - vanilla or kink.

I appriciate your view on the financial damages that divorce causes a man. I've had the pleasure of dating men who were divorced and we couldn't to much of anything because of an ex who was demanding x amount in her account monthly. Or it made them not want to committ because of her evil doing. Gee thanks, just love being lumped in with butt munches who have not personal ethics and are greedy!

I know I'm not the norm, but my view point is this - I AM a capable human being who has morals, a concious, and standards. I know how to provide for myself, I'm single aren't I? and doing it. What I have to take to the marriage I would expect to take with me should I leave, the same with him. The stuff we accquire together, to me it's just material stuff, I can always get again. I didn't need a man's income to provide for myself and I woldn't want that should I get divorced. But then, I'm from a different school of logic where I know you won't always agree, conflict will happen. It's how you deal with it that determines your success or demise.

If there are children it's simple you either want to be a dad and part of their life or you don't. If you do, I would expect help with things like scoutting uniforms/dues, ballet shoes, etc as well as sharing other parenting duties like custody. Things you'd help with had we stayed together. If you don't want to be part of your kids life - that's fine but no changing your mind later, wait until they are 18 to make contact. I honestly don't think that's a horrible attitude to splitting things up.

I am also the grandchild of a VERY BITTER divorce. A woman I should call grandma and don't, is in my opinion evil incarnate. The things she did to my grandfather, father and aunt and uncles in the divorce process are WAY beyond what is allowed today. And you know she may have divorced my grandpa but she continued to take it out on my dad and then one day my brother and I. So I'm VERY aware of how horrible a divorce can be.

I'd like to briefly mention that not all men are the "big bread winner". What about the woman who makes more and has to pay his lifestyle expenses? Liz Taylor, granted has been married several times, is a wealthy woman.

Northern California is where I call home. You know, I know a woman whose ex husband doesn't pay her alimony - he makes less than her. He also ran up credit cards and she got stuck paying the bills. Because of what he did at the end of the marriage it made it so she couldn't buy a home due to the credit rating. She's been repairing credit damage he did to her. This isn't a one sided deal that only the man gets screwed.

It's call human decency and having morals and ethics. There just are some bad people, men or women, out there. People who are greedy and don't care about how they harm someone they once loved enough to marry.

quote:

Marriage seems to be more a relationship GOAL for a woman. Men see the relationship itself as a goal. On the surface it doesn't appear to be a significant difference. Except, and here is were long ago personal experience rears it's ugly head, once the goal is obtained for woman they commonly see the "race won" and the competition over. Once the tape is broken at the end of the race, few continue to "train". There is no distinction here, vanilla or lifestyle, I've seen it happen. There's a joke that best illustrates the point. "Why is a bride smiling when she's walking down the aisle?" - "Because she knows she given the LAST blow job she'll ever have to give."

Men fall deeply in love with woman and marry them hoping they'll never change. Hoping that the fantastic relationship that caused him to feel drawn to marry her would only evolve to something even stronger after marriage. Woman commonly say, I'll change him once we're married. I'm make him dress different. I'll get him to help with the cleaning. I'll cut down his nights out with the guys.



First of all for me, it's not a relationship GOAL. (reasons for marriage below) You know I've heard that about the blow job, not only as the joke but from actual guys. In my opinion you either give head or you don't. You either like anal or you don't. If you stop giving head after marriage you should have stopped when he committed himself to you so he'd get a better sense of who you are. I think that women who behave this way are just as bad as the "player" men out there. It's not right, but that wont' make it stop happening.

The best way I could sum that up would be to share an evening with some old friends, we had a game night. The couple that hosted it had had twins. On game night the kids went to grandma and grandpa's. She used to play with us but used it as time to read, soak in a bath, or down time. One game night I showed up about an hour early and when I got there I said "I'm sorry I'm early, I'm not interupting sex or something am I?". They both looked at each other and laughed and said "we're married, and we have twins, we don't have sex any more". That weighed on my mind all night. Well later that evening I shared this with the rest of the group (which were all guys) and I just blurted out "the thing that scares me the most about marriage and kids is that the I'll loose my sex drive - that would be bad, that can't happen!". As we all walked to our cars two of the guys stopped me and said "you know, you aren't a normal girl." I looked at them a bit confused, while I already knew this it was like huh? "Most women don't care if they loose their sex drives after marriage and kids, that's what's different". I looked at them and said "gentlmen, despite what people say sex is important in any relationship, and if you can't maintain a good sex life with your partner your doomed to fail." They smiled and we all got in our cars. Of course this lead to future evenings of chatting about sex etc.

I don't date someone thinking I'll change them. It doesn't work. You accept them for who they are, and they you. It's a two way street. As for the dress different - well if he complains of not getting promoted and such and he dresses like a dork then I may mention that he may want to try dressing for success to see if that helps. As for cleaning, I may be a submissive, but I can't do it all. Any man worth having will know that. I've never understood the "he's going out with his friends" ...um ok go have fun, I'm going out with the girls. Now that's what usually gets them. "You aren't staying home?" Um no. Just like he has his friends I have mine.

Another fine example of accepting someone for who they are is when I first moved here a gentleman was interested in dating me. After two dates I told him I wasn't interested. He asked why. I said we weren't compatable. He pushed the issue on wanting to know why and this is what I told him: "I'm wise enough to know that I won't ever change you. There are some personal hygene issues I'm not ok with." This prompted him to want to know what and so I told him that he has unkept facial hair, his teeth look like they are not brushed in a week, and when he says to dress up becase we are going out some where nice, and I'm dressed to the 9's and he's in flip flops and jeans that is not what I considered nice. He had excuses / reasons for all of the things. So I told him, "exactly my point. You have reasons for all of this, which is fine, you asked I told you, I just know I'm not going to change those things, and I'm not ok with them".


quote:

Just as you should take an honest and hard look and assess your motives when you want to be a slave, submissive, Master, Mistress, Dom or Domme; you must take the same honest assessment prior to becoming a spouse. Why is marriage a goal? Commitment? Social Acceptance? Family Acceptance? Personal Identity? What are the anticipated changes in your day to day relationship with the other person? What will be better? How? Are your motives selfish?


Marriage isn't a goal. Getting my degree is a goal. Marriage is an enhancement to life. I may never get married. I don't want to grow old alone. My biggest fear is being an Aunt to all my friends kids and my brother putting me in a home when I'm 80. When I was 12 I was in a youth group and we adopted a lady out of a nursing home. We'd take group trips to see her and make her cards etc. We were encouraged to write to her indipendantly. Out of 15 girls I was the only one that did so regularly. She was 78 years old, and never had kids. No one visited her or wrote to her. The joy and happiness that woman felt by me taking a moment to write will live with me forever. I was one of 3 girls to go to her funeral, when she passed at 90 something.

My desire is not out of societies norms, family pressures or anything other than personal experience of seeing how lonely a person can get in old age when they have no one.

I want to be married for companionship. I enjoy cooking and baking and all those homemaker activities. I hate coming home to an empty house, to a TV for company. I don't like cooking for myself. I'd like someone to travel with. Someone who will share in my joys and be a shoulder in my sorrows and I for him. Last week I got so excited, I got an A in one of my classes and the people I had to call were my parents and some friends. Which is wonderful, don't get me wrong. Just wish I had someone special to share that initial excitment with. Is that selfish? I don't think so. I think it's basic human needs of wanting companionship.

I want to be a mom. I helped raise my best friends little girl for the first 2 years of her life. She'll be 5 at the end of the month. I love her as if she were my own. Trust me I don't look forward to the blow out diappers, vomit, crying, etc. What I look forward too is seeing something that I created with someone out of love, grow, and experience the world for the first time. It helps you remember the things you take for granted, IMHO.

My family has been the one telling me "you don't need a husband or bf, wait til you are done with school. If there aren't any good guys, you can adopt.". My family is very supportive of me doing what I want and what will make me happy. I'm VERY fortunate.


quote:

Why not let it happen and let the person you are in a relationship be that sure about you?


Um I thought that's generally how it went. I don't want to be a fuck buddy. I want someone there to grow and experience stuff with. But I also don't want to waist my time either. If a guy knows he won't ever be married and hates kids, why waiste my time? I'm not going to change that. I'd be a fool to think I will date a man and after investing years of my life that he'll change his mind on marriage - he won't.

What's so wrong with wanting to spend time getting to know each other? Building a solid foundation? What's wrong with stating that eventually you want to be settled down and have a family? I don't think anything is wrong with those things.

*shrug* I generally don't play causually. I genrally don't have causal sex. I'm just not into slam bam thank you ma'am. It's amazing to me how many so called dominants want to play the first time or two they meet you. I'm sorry but you can NOT possibly know enough about me to ensure a safe play environement for me. Everytime I do it's not a positive experience for me - so why continue doing it? Seems that to get to the committed relationship part these days you need to be willing to play casually / have causal sex. I have sick twisted fantasies I'd love to live out ... but it requires trusting someone a great deal. I just don't trust someone to that level after one date. *shrug*



Em

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 32
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: LTR doesn't mean LTR for all. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047