RE: fetish

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: fetish

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: fetish

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: fetish - 5/2/2007 6:54:01 AM

temptressofsouls

Posts: 208
Joined: 3/29/2005
From: Toledo, OH
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Milivoje

IMO thin is sexy... It adds to the "fragile" image of the slave girl.

But wouldnt someone extremely skinny theoretically be able to take less blunt impact? (okay, that sounds morbid as hell but I'm talking about hard sex, hips against hips, and striking instruments.)

I'd imagine a flogger would hurt a lot more on a skinny person then it would on someone with more padding...And thrice-fold for paddles.

(in reply to Milivoje)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: fetish - 5/2/2007 9:07:03 AM

Milivoje

Posts: 57
Joined: 7/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: temptressofsouls
But wouldnt someone extremely skinny theoretically be able to take less blunt impact? (okay, that sounds morbid as hell but I'm talking about hard sex, hips against hips, and striking instruments.)

I'd imagine a flogger would hurt a lot more on a skinny person then it would on someone with more padding...And thrice-fold for paddles.

Pain is a relative thing. Different people perceive pain in different ways but it is down to a common thing: nerve recipients in the epidermal area. An interesting thing is a study by Liem et al. suggesting that redheads are more susceptible to thermal pain. It makes no difference in SM play if you are thin or fat. The only difference is in how you actually perceive the actual pain.

Theoretically speaking a fat person could withstand a stronger impact than a thin one because of all the fat tissue. That kind of impact could be inflicted with a baseball bat, quite inappropriate for an SM scene in my opinion.

(in reply to temptressofsouls)

Profile

Post #: 22