RE: The Nazification of America (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


FirmhandKY -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 10:20:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

How do we counter program the Administration's propaganda?


The same way you do anyone's propaganda, by logic, pointing out the inconsistencies, and revealing the full facts, not just their version of it.





CuriousLord -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 10:34:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

Read it and weep....

http://www.scoreboard-canada.com/nazification.htm


Sorry, I'm too busy making sure Arabs wear their stars and go to their internment camps like good little Jews.

I would read it later, but I'll be too busy figuring out how we're integrating Iraq into our own country.

Wait.  What do you mean the government's encouraging us to not judge people based on race?  Oh, damn, we went into Iraq but we're not adding it to our own national territory?

Damn it, now just what the hell am I going to do with all of these blue contact lenses and this blonde hair dye I could've sworn Bush was going to force us into using?

Edit:
PS-  Sometimes, I think if I were in the position of someone like Bush, I would become incredibly irritated one day and go on national television to announce the coming launch of my new book:  "My Problem".  Just to screw with the conspiracy theorists.




farglebargle -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 11:42:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

How do we counter program the Administration's propaganda?


The same way you do anyone's propaganda, by logic, pointing out the inconsistencies, and revealing the full facts, not just their version of it.




Sounds good, but how to reach the OTHER 99% of the population who can't deal with the logic?







Real0ne -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 11:43:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Well, I waded through both of your articles with hip deep rubber boots, and I must say, they are both great examples of emotional propaganda as I've ever seen.

Built on half-truths, lies, and an occasional fact to give it a semblence of credibility, along with large doses of hyperbole and exaggerations, it is designed to bypass a persons rational mind, and get their fear and anxiety churning.

Fear mongering in other words, for those who don't really keep up in detail with current events, don't have a very good grasp of history, politics or current events.

Insulting, at the least.

I'm really quiet disappointed, Lotus, if these really reflect your beliefs. 

FirmKY



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

The truth isn't much in evidence in either of the articles, and an attempt at an emotional, personal attack against me certainly doesn't help convince me, or anyone else.

It's propaganda because it mets the defintion of propaganda.  Take your pick:

Propaganda:  one-sided information intended either to support or threaten a political or military group.

www.longman.co.uk/tt_seceng/resources/glosauth.htm


Propaganda:  A way of presenting a belief that seeks to generate acceptance without regard to facts or the right of others to be heard. Propaganda often presents the same argument repeatedly, in the simplest terms and ignores all rebuttal or counter-argument. It is essentially self- interested and often associated with authoritarian regimes. ...

freespace.virgin.net/john.hewitt1/pg_gloss.htm


Propaganda:  1. an extreme form of written or spoken persuasion intended to influence the reader or listener strongly, though sometimes subtly, and usually by one-sided rather than objective arguments. 2. speaking or writing that attempts to persuade listeners or readers to accept a particular point of view, either good or bad depending on the speaker's or writer's intent, as advertising propaganda to sell soap.

www.nde.state.ne.us/READ/FRAMEWORK/glossary/general_p-t.html


Propaganda:  false or partly false information used by a government or political party intended to sway the opinions of the population.

www.teach-nology.com/worksheets/soc_studies/holocaust/vocab/

Propaganda:  A campaign directed at a targeted audience designed to influence opinions, beliefs and emotions to bring specific alterations in behavior. The presentation might be logical and dispassionate or rhetorical to arouse emotions or prejudices, but the message is always deliberately slanted to lead toward a mindset that benefits the cause.

www.information-entertainment.com/Politics/polterms.html


Propaganda:  systematic efforts to spread opinions or beliefs. especially by distortion and deception; any plan or method for spreading opinions or beliefs.

schools.cbe.ab.ca/b628/social/russia/glossary.html


Propaganda:  The systematic propagation of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a cause. Basically to drown you with information so that you tend to believe them more than not believe them. Like in advertising of pet food products, saying they are "pure" and "wholesome" when they really are not.

www.diamondpaws.com/health/definitions.htm

FirmKY


and your response is called double think.  you're good, sort of

So you have a problem with the real history contained the national archives and lable it propaganda?  more like no one can have an opinion in ky land unless it follows along your precise agenda for correct thought? i suggest that your revisionist version is propaganda.  refuting historical records from the nationsal archives as propaganda wont do much for your credibility any more than telling people what to think.

you have done a wonderful job describing what the government/media has been doing over the years.




CuriousLord -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:04:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
So you have a problem with the real history contained the national archives and lable it propaganda?  more like no one can have an opinion in ky land unless it follows along your precise agenda for correct thought? i suggest that your revisionist version is propaganda.  refuting historical records from the nationsal archives as propaganda wont do much for your credibility any more than telling people what to think.

you have done a wonderful job describing what the government/media has been doing over the years.



What part of history did FirmhandKY revise?




FirmhandKY -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:09:25 PM)

I figured you'd love the Idaho Observer, Real0ne, I'm just surprised that Lotus fell for it.

It's right up your alley.  "Truthers" - 9/11 was a US black op, "Illuminati" - secret rulers of the world, "contrails" - a secret plan to poison the US through aerial distribution of suspect substances ... its all there, and more on their website.

They consider themselves a "conservative" site.  I say they are the right-wing loony fringe, just as bad as the left wing loony fringe.

You, and they, do little to advance the causes you seem to wish to further. 

To the contrary, you hurt the cause of liberty by giving fodder to it's opponents to dismiss you as unbalanced and by ensuring that the wider audience that might be sympathetic to some of your causes are repulsed and revolted by your objectionable and slanted messages.

FirmKY




popeye1250 -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:16:39 PM)

Lotus, don't worry, there's 400 million firearms in the hands of American Citizens.
Some people even have military weapons buried in their back yards.
If neccessary we could storm the gated communities and kill all the rich people "in charge."




FirmhandKY -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:33:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

Gee.. maybe it is unfair to compare Bush to Hitler...  my bad:

http://www.exile.ru/2002-October-02/editorial.html


This article (Bush-Hitler Comparison Unjust) was published in "The eXile", a "Moscow based alt newspaper" according to their website.

"The eXile" was founded by an expat American journalist by the name of Mark Ames.

Some info about "The eXile":

The eXile, founded in 1997, is a Moscow-based English-language biweekly free newspaper, aimed at the city's expatriate community, which combines outrageous content with investigative reporting. In October 2006, co-editor Jake Rudnitsky summarized the eXile's editorial policy to The Independent: "We shit on everybody equally.

...

Its history has seen a number of practical jokes or stunts, including reportedly getting Mikhail Gorbachev to enter negotiations to secure a position as "perestroika coordinator" for the New York Jets.

...

As Taibbi remarked in 2000: "We wrote a whole bunch of editorials about the size of Putin's penis," and "[t]he 90s in Moscow were a great time ...


...

Former editor Matt Taibbi has said that operating a periodical in Russia was much easier without the burden of American libel laws. Similarly, Ames asserted in his article “Democracy Sucks” that “we'd be sued out of existence within a few weeks of appearing in any Western democracy, but here in Russia, in the so-called kleptocracy, the power elite has been too busy stealing and killing to give a fuck about us, allowing us to fly around the capital beneath their radar, like a cruise missile. A real democracy would never let us get off the ground.”


So ... this is a writer, and a publication that you credit with being ... worthy of basing your political opinions on?

FirmKY




Real0ne -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:50:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I figured you'd love the Idaho Observer, Real0ne, I'm just surprised that Lotus fell for it.

It's right up your alley.  "Truthers" - 9/11 was a US black op, "Illuminati" - secret rulers of the world, "contrails" - a secret plan to poison the US through aerial distribution of suspect substances ... its all there, and more on their website.

They consider themselves a "conservative" site.  I say they are the right-wing loony fringe, just as bad as the left wing loony fringe.

You, and they, do little to advance the causes you seem to wish to further. 

To the contrary, you hurt the cause of liberty by giving fodder to it's opponents to dismiss you as unbalanced and by ensuring that the wider audience that might be sympathetic to some of your causes are repulsed and revolted by your objectionable and slanted messages.

FirmKY


you have gall my friend talking to me about hurting the cause of liberty while you staunchly support party lines of a tyranical government. 

They put the fucking eye of horus right on the dollar bill and show it off to you, stick it right in your nose and you will stand there and say they do not exist?   If it wasnt so sad i would have a heart attack laughing.

Are you really that naive?

What do you think that little insignia means?  sister mary in the choir singing hymns?

So just what has your government done to protect our liberties my friend?  You want to make that claim great!  Lets see who can come with with the longest list then.




NakedOnMyChain -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:51:24 PM)

It would be a frightening parallel if it was correct.




Real0ne -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 12:52:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Lotus, don't worry, there's 400 million firearms in the hands of American Citizens.
Some people even have military weapons buried in their back yards.
If neccessary we could storm the gated communities and kill all the rich people "in charge."



Hear hear!  it has never been done, hold a whole world at bay and hostage?  Then we will understand what the innocent muslims are suffering right now, because if it doesnt change i am sure there will be plenty of martyrs and blood to go around.   

For every president that gets murdered knock off a rothschild, morgan and a long list of others and believe me it will never happen again.  mark my fucking words people.

The sad part is that all these self proclaimed "superior" thinkers/back yard analysts are to blind to realize that if you are going to err, err on the side of reason.

In other words the last thing a secret group wants is to be discovered and hunted, to err where the tables are turned and they are hunted, will keep them at bay, to err and scoff it off is a "i am all lubed up come and get me" call.

There is so much data and by respectable people on the illuminati it is fucking rediculous.  In fact the real joke is that they call them out by name for christ sake in the matrix!

Watch the movie idiocracy its great, it really describes this country well.




Real0ne -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 1:10:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

"Illuminati" - secret rulers of the world,


by the way ky can you read russian?

It seems the kgb sure spent a lot of time chasing after them.  Maybe the russian kgb is equally as ignorant to your revisionist history as i am.

have another blue pill

as far as chem trails are concerned i have seen them, people have went up and sampled the air afterwards and found shit, the government has been sued over it more then once, but then you knew that right?




FirmhandKY -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 1:19:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

you have gall my friend talking to me about hurting the cause of liberty while you staunchly support party lines of a tyranical government. 

They put the fucking eye of horus right on the dollar bill and show it off to you, stick it right in your nose and you will stand there and say they do not exist?   If it wasnt so sad i would have a heart attack laughing.

Are you really that naive?

What do you think that little insignia means?  sister mary in the choir singing hymns?

So just what has your government done to protect our liberties my friend?  You want to make that claim great!  Lets see who can come with with the longest list then.


Real0ne, I think I've told you before that I actually kinda like you, and believe that you aren't far wrong on your basic belief that the amount of freedoms and liberties that we enjoy is being eroded away, and I'd like to turn that around.

But your concepts are marred with an unreasonable sense of conspiracy, rather than a more accurate understanding of human nature, history and organizations.

You see, the issue is that you are "fighting" something that you have mis-identified.  Therefore, your fight won't, and can't be as effective as it could be, and should be.  You are wasting time, energy and good-will on a chimera, a ghost, a phantom that will always frustrate you, and cause you to drop deeper and deeper into despair and anger.

The end result will be that your spirit will be crushed, and you'll either turn away from society in disgust, or turn to radical means and methods, and cause an even greater loss of freedoms and liberties than we already have.

I'm not naive my friend.  I just prefer my missiles to hit dead center and have an effect, rather than bounce off the ozone and give a good light show and be entertainment for the masses.

FirmKY




LadyEllen -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 1:43:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


Real0ne, I think I've told you before that I actually kinda like you, and believe that you aren't far wrong on your basic belief that the amount of freedoms and liberties that we enjoy is being eroded away, and I'd like to turn that around.

But your concepts are marred with an unreasonable sense of conspiracy, rather than a more accurate understanding of human nature, history and organizations.

You see, the issue is that you are "fighting" something that you have mis-identified.  Therefore, your fight won't, and can't be as effective as it could be, and should be.  You are wasting time, energy and good-will on a chimera, a ghost, a phantom that will always frustrate you, and cause you to drop deeper and deeper into despair and anger.

The end result will be that your spirit will be crushed, and you'll either turn away from society in disgust, or turn to radical means and methods, and cause an even greater loss of freedoms and liberties than we already have.

I'm not naive my friend.  I just prefer my missiles to hit dead center and have an effect, rather than bounce off the ozone and give a good light show and be entertainment for the masses.

FirmKY


I'm afraid, for what its worth from a Brit, that this is exactly how all this stuff comes over - chasing a phantom, under various guises.

I'm more than prepared to entertain the notion of some powerful group or perhaps a multitude of groups with a common aim of running the world etc for their own ends. That seems to be something that would have happened by now in our "civilisation", that such a group would have arisen that has the power to at least think it could accomplish such an aim. Its the natural way of things for us.

But to think that such a group or groups bent on such dark motives and with such power residing in their grasp, would allow we plebs to have come to know about them and their aims, I find a little strange.

I'm afraid I tend to think of "what we know" as being purely what the magician wants us to be looking at, whilst he is preparing his next trick. And I also tend to think that the magician may have little or no connection with those whom we might be directed to observe whilst he practices his art, with the result that those who seek quite rightfully to identify the perceived threat, come across as not a little deranged and therefore need not be treated seriously - according to the plan of the magician.

E





ModeratorEleven -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 1:45:51 PM)

Ok folks, once again it's time to chill out.
 
XI




Real0ne -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 5:53:55 PM)

     "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not
behind the scenes." --Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England, in 1844.

   "The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule
established."-- Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book "Tragedy and Hope".

"The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls
its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation."-- Mayor (1918-1925) John F. Hylan of New York.

    "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."-- U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House.

    "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insideous forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur

   "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -- Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg ("Angel" to and active in the United World Federalists), son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James' brother Max, banker to the German government - See the Siss?on Report

   "[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most
significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United
States to change it's perceptions." -- Henry Kissenger, World Affairs Council Press Conference,
Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994

   "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion
for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
http://www.freedomdomain.com/nwoquote.htm
http://www.greaterthings.com/Conspiracy/NewWorldOrder/NWO_quotes.htm
http://www.svpvril.com/nwo.html
The quotes from prestigious people are endless!  i could literally fill cm's hard drives with this crap!


This is a pretty good read from what i can tell:

His name was Adam Weishaupt and the organization he founded on May 1, 1776, was called the Order of the Illuminati.


In dealing with an emotionally-charged topic such as conspiracy, to avoid confusion it is necessary to begin with a definition of the concept. Conspiracy is a human activity involving (1) more than one person, (2) the parties to this activity are advancing basically the same or common objectives, and (3) they are advancing objectives which, by very reasonable standards, are personally harmful, evil or destructive. And, finally, (4) they're doing all this either in secret or without fully advertising in advance what they're planning to do, and certainly not to their potential victims.

Note that the definition says the parties to a conspiracy are doing the same things, or advancing common objectives, but not at all necessarily are they all doing so for the same personal reasons or motivations. And the essential focus of conspiratorial research should be on the actions of individual persons, not merely their backgrounds or organizational affiliations.

Down through the ages there have been many secret societies and conspiratorial movements that had as their goals absolute rule of the world, overthrow of all existing governments, and the final destruction of all religion.

It is possible (with much study-see Annotated Bibliography) to trace the origins and developments of these many movements: the early anti-Christian mysticism of the Gnostics; the conspiracy against orthodox Islam and for world power that was founded by Hasan Saba in Persia in 1090 A.D. as the Order of the Assassins; the Catholic Order of the Knights Templar, whose heretical leaders imitated the Assassins' system for the destruction of Christianity. During the thirteenth through seventeenth centuries such groups as the Luciferians, Rosicrucians, Levellers and many others continued the war against Christianity that had begun in Europe with the Templars. It is even possible to establish that some of these groups were not merely imitating each other or some older system of belief and a few organizational links can be found.



http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/early_history_of_the_illuminati_conspiracy.htm


With the help of Adolph Freiherr Knigge, on May 1, 1776 Weishaupt formed the "Order of Perfectibilists", which was later known as the Illuminati. He adopted the name of "Brother Spartacus" within the order. Though the Order was not egalitarian or democratic, its mission was to establish a New World Order, which meant the abolition of all monarchical governments and religions.  Soon however he had developed gnostic mysteries of his own, with the goal of "perfecting human" nature through re-education to achieve a communal state with nature, freed of government and organized religion. He began working towards incorporating his system of Illuminism into that of Masonry, with the aim of creating a New World Order.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt


Adam Weishaupt was a Bavarian Illuminati who, on 1st May 1776, with the financial support of the House of Rothschild, founded a German expression of Illuminism. However, the Bavarian seers can be traced back to a 16th century Muslim cult of illuminated men called the Roshaniya in Afghanistan. Weishaupt produced the “Law of Fives.” His original inner council was structured around the pentagram.
http://www.holygrail-church.fsnet.co.uk/The%20Illuminati.htm



quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Real0ne, I think I've told you before that I actually kinda like you, and believe that you aren't far wrong on your basic belief that the amount of freedoms and liberties that we enjoy is being eroded away, and I'd like to turn that around.

But your concepts are marred with an unreasonable sense of conspiracy, rather than a more accurate understanding of human nature, history and organizations.

You see, the issue is that you are "fighting" something that you have mis-identified.  Therefore, your fight won't, and can't be as effective as it could be, and should be.  You are wasting time, energy and good-will on a chimera, a ghost, a phantom that will always frustrate you, and cause you to drop deeper and deeper into despair and anger.

The end result will be that your spirit will be crushed, and you'll either turn away from society in disgust, or turn to radical means and methods, and cause an even greater loss of freedoms and liberties than we already have.

I'm not naive my friend.  I just prefer my missiles to hit dead center and have an effect, rather than bounce off the ozone and give a good light show and be entertainment for the masses.

FirmKY



there are a few quotes for you.

Frankly how much you like or dislike me is entirely irrelevant to the topic at hand.  

First you say this:
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Well, I waded through both of your articles with hip deep rubber boots, and I must say, they are both great examples of emotional propaganda as I've ever seen.

Built on half-truths, lies, and an occasional fact to give it a semblence of credibility, along with large doses of hyperbole and exaggerations, it is designed to bypass a persons rational mind, and get their fear and anxiety churning.

Fear mongering in other words, for those who don't really keep up in detail with current events, don't have a very good grasp of history, politics or current events.

Insulting, at the least.

I'm really quiet disappointed, Lotus, if these really reflect your beliefs.

FirmKY


Then you turn right around and say that i am "not far wrong".

That is classic "double-speak" in this simplest form!  i dont mean to get down on you man but when people post things like this it it causes my brain to go into a void.  (and i do not like voids)

The problem with double-speak/think/do/ new-speak is that people do it and are never the wiser unless a mean guy like me stands up and says something.

You believe i have mis-identified the target, and to the contrary it is you who mis-identified the target.  again i am not being derogatory here.  The point is you cannot just shut certain data off because your mind does not like what it hears or cannot accept it and come out with correct answers.

You cannot take actual events recorded and pretend they do not exist(national archive records on bush), (likewise the well documented history of the illumnati), and just wipe them out from historical record "without" preaching revisionist history.  sorry.

You do not understand me at all.  My spirit will never be crushed!  i have 50 years of life so far where people have "always" shook their heads in disbelief of the things i have done.(that i was told was impossible or that cannot be done)  Like with the fusion thread, (ordered more parts today).  It will happen! period! regardless of skeptics. (they can continue burning gas for all i give a rip). its my life always has been always will be.

Oh and i got a bunch of parts in today for my "on demand hydrogen" generator that will draw roughly 25 horsepower to produce 210hp from my engine.

As far as your missles are concerned think of it like this.  Granted we have to start somewhere so i will give you that, however if you do not pull a weed out by its roots it never goes away.  i talk about the roots i do not care if people shun it, they will soon be sorry they did not as that noose keeps tightening around their necks.  i am preparing myself to keep those problems as far away from me as possible and i hate to see people enslaved but from the response on this "one" particular site i feel they deserve it.  Those who do not know who they are.

you shold know there is 2 versions of history the sanitized version and the cause and effect "real" version, and if you did not i just told you.   Because you fail to see it as a conspiracy hardly impies there is not one, in fact several right under your nose.

i would rather be laughed at and be correct than popular and incorrect.  If i wanted popular i could be a politician.




CuriousLord -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 6:54:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

"Illuminati" - secret rulers of the world,


by the way ky can you read russian?

It seems the kgb sure spent a lot of time chasing after them.  Maybe the russian kgb is equally as ignorant to your revisionist history as i am.

have another blue pill


Heh.  It's pigeons like Firm that think we're not real.  As a matter of fact, everyone else here but you, Real0ne, wouldn't even believe we're real after I come out and say it.

PS-  The dove barks at midnight.




Real0ne -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 8:00:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

"Illuminati" - secret rulers of the world,


by the way ky can you read russian?

It seems the kgb sure spent a lot of time chasing after them.  Maybe the russian kgb is equally as ignorant to your revisionist history as i am.

have another blue pill


Heh.  It's pigeons like Firm that think we're not real.  As a matter of fact, everyone else here but you, Real0ne, wouldn't even believe we're real after I come out and say it.

PS-  The dove barks at midnight.


well th ewhole thing is silly imo, i mean heel even hitler essentially wanted to take over the world, had subs in the new york harbor and a bomber that could have hit newyork too in another 1 or 2 had the war not ended when it did.  thousands of conspiracies throughout history that are on the records and to think no one else would want to take over the world when its happening before our eyes is simply ludicrous.




LAPhotogDaddy -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 8:09:39 PM)

The comparisons to Hitler are unfair and inaccurate - for one, Hitler was much smarter than Bush.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist at all, and I don't think Bush is a secret Nazi. I also don't think he is a consciously dark and malicious figure. I do think that he has UNINTENTIONALLY done great damage to the nation, from which we may not recover.

As a student of history, you have to be pretty numb to miss the frightening parallels between Stalinism/fascism and our country today. If you can't see the parallels, you're not looking.




lockedaway -> RE: The Nazification of America (5/2/2007 8:35:54 PM)

The people that make comparisons to Bush as Hitler and the "nazification" of America are at best wrong, commonly just damned ignorant and at the worst, unpatriotic leaches sucking off the United States. 

Unlike the U.S., Germany was NEVER faced with the unslaught of terrorism and the spector of a nuclear detonation in a key city or the capital.  We are.  Is anyone out there so blatantly obtuse that they don't understand that?? 

You want to draw a correlation to America and another country?  Fine.  The country to compare us to is Peru in the early 1990's.  An extremely virulent and violent terrorist movement was sweeping through Peru in the early 90's.  Peru was a democracy at the time but declared martial law: I'll leave it to you to determine what freedoms were suspended but suffice it to say nothing similar has happened in America.  The underground movement (I think it was called The Shining Path) was crushed in 1992, martial law was repealed and replaced, once again, with Democracy.  Ok...there ya go.  There is your correlation.  And if you folks don't think that maritial law will be declared in this country if there is a nuclear detonation, you got another think coming.

I ask anyone who wants to write to explain what civil right they have PERSONALLY lost under the Bush Administration.  (By the way, it was during the Clinton administration that the "carnivore" system for monitoring billions of e mail was put into place.  Why not compare him to Hitler?)  Was it the right to keep and bear arms?  No...but the Democrats would like that.  Was it the right to counsel?  No.  Was it the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures?  No, although that right was at it's zenith with the analysis in Katz in the 60's but we have increasingly swung back to the analysis in Olmstead from the 20's.  Was it the right not to make incriminating statements?  No.  So what write has any respondent to this post lost?  I bet you haven't lost any.

As I said, many of the people who compare this country to Nazi Germany and just plain stupid.  With a little reading and research, they would stop doing that.  But there is another group of people who compare this country to Nazi Germany because it is wishful thinking on their part.  They "want" to see this country unravel and so they make the most heinous comparisons and levy the most terrible criticisms they can of their country.   




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.125