Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

"Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 11:40:24 AM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline

"Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses"
 
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer
4 minutes ago

" WASHINGTON - Congressional leaders on Thursday demanded that the Veterans Affairs secretary explain hefty bonuses for senior department officials involved in crafting a budget that came up $1 billion short and jeopardized veterans' health care.

Rep. Harry Mitchell (news, bio, voting record), chairman of the House Veterans' Affairs subcommittee on oversight, said he would hold hearings to investigate after The Associated Press reported that budget officials at the Veterans Affairs Department received bonuses ranging up to $33,000.

Sen. Daniel Akaka (news, bio, voting record), who heads the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, said the payments pointed to an improper "entitlement for the most centrally placed or well-connected staff." He has sent a letter to VA chief Jim Nicholson asking what the department plans to do to eliminate any bonuses based on favoritism.

"These reports point to an apparent gross injustice at the VA that we have a responsibility to investigate," said Mitchell, D-Ariz. "No government official should ever be rewarded for misleading taxpayers, and the VA should not be handing out the most lucrative bonuses in government as veterans are waiting months and months to see a doctor."

A list obtained by the AP of bonuses to senior career officials in 2006 documents a generous package of more than $3.8 million in payments by a financially strapped agency straining to help care for thousands of injured veterans returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Among those receiving payments were a deputy assistant secretary and several regional directors who crafted the VA's flawed budget for 2005 based on misleading accounting. They received performance payments up to $33,000 each, a figure equal to about 20 percent of their annual salaries.
 
Also receiving a top bonus was the deputy undersecretary for benefits, who helps manage a disability claims system that has a backlog of cases and delays averaging 177 days in getting benefits to injured veterans.

The bonuses were awarded even after government investigators had determined the VA repeatedly miscalculated — if not deliberately misled taxpayers — with questionable methods used to justify Bush administration cuts to health care amid the burgeoning Iraq war.
 
Annual bonuses to senior VA officials now average more than $16,000 — the most lucrative in government. All bonuses are proposed by division chiefs, then approved by Nicholson.

A VA spokesman said the payments are necessary to retain hardworking career officials. "Rewarding knowledgeable and professional career public servants is entirely appropriate," spokesman Matt Burns said.

Several watchdog groups questioned the practice. They cited short-staffing and underfunding at VA clinics that have become particularly evident after recent disclosures of shoddy outpatient treatment of injured troops at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.

"Hundreds of thousands of our veterans remain homeless every day and hundreds of thousands more veterans wait six months or more for VA disability claim decisions," said Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. "The lavish amounts of VA bonus cash would be better spent on a robust plan to cut VA red tape."

In a letter to Nicholson, Akaka also asked the department to outline steps to address disparities in which Washington-based senior officials got higher payments than their counterparts elsewhere.

"Awards should be determined according to performance," said Akaka, D-Hawaii. "I am concerned by this generous pat on the back for those who failed to ensure that their budget requests accurately reflected VA's needs."

Burns, who said the department is reviewing Akaka's request, said many of the senior officials have the kind of experience that would be hard to replace.
"The importance of retaining committed career leaders in any government organization cannot be overstated," Burns said.

VA officials characterized the agency's Washington-based jobs as more difficult, often involving management of several layers of divisions that would justify the higher payments.

In 2006, the VA officials receiving top bonuses included Rita Reed, the deputy assistant secretary for budget, and William Feeley, a former VA network director who is now deputy undersecretary for health for operations and management.
Also receiving $33,000 was Ronald Aument, the deputy undersecretary for benefits, who helps oversee the strained and backlogged claims system that Nicholson now says is unacceptable.
 
In July 2005, the VA stunned Congress by suddenly announcing it faced a $1 billion shortfall after failing to take into account the additional cost of caring for veterans injured in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
The admission came months after the department insisted it was operating within its means and did not need additional money.
 
The investigative arm of Congress, the  Government Accountability Office, determined the VA had used misleading accounting methods and claimed false savings of more than $1.3 billion, apparently because President Bush was not willing, at the time, to ask Congress for more money.
 
According to the White House Office of Personnel Management, roughly three of every four senior officials at the VA have received some kind of bonus each year. In recent years, the payment amount has steadily increased from being one of the lowest in government — $8,120 in 2002 — to the most generous — $16,713 in 2005.

In contrast, just over half the senior officials at the Energy Department in 2005 received an average bonus of $9,064. Across all government agencies, about two-thirds of employees received bonuses, which averaged $13,814 in 2005, the most recent data available. "

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070503/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/veterans_care_bonuses

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 12:00:33 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Sounds regrettably similar to many businesses here in the UK - outrageous bonuses even when a company is failing.

I find it amazing that these bonuses are justified in order to retain experienced and knowledgeable officials in such circumstances. So experienced and knowledgeable, that they made a total mess of the whole affair.

I propose a full reorganisation - fire the lot of them. They may reapply for their jobs at a more appropriate remuneration package.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 12:10:07 PM   
soultoshare


Posts: 519
Joined: 8/24/2006
Status: offline
Are they kidding???!!!  BONUSES????  i agree w/ladyEllen, fire the whole damn bunch and put all their bonus money in a pot for all the veterans they have kicked in the teeth.  I want to know how to get one of THOSE jobs.......why give bonuses to anyone anyway?  They can work two jobs just like the rest of the working poor in this country...i'm so sick of my tax dollars going to some fat cat in some cushy office someplace.  Since when does even DOING your job warrant a bonus...ain't that what the paycheck is for? 

As far as the whole legislators "uproar and outrage"....pfffffftttt!!!!  I'll believe it when i see it....they are the same people who vote themselves a raise every year, first order of business with the start of each new session.  They are probably just trying to figure out how they can get hte same deal!

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 12:58:20 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
WTF! I've needed knee surgery due to a service related injury for 3 years. Its been postponed 7 or 8 times due to the VA not having enough surgeons etc.. Nobody at the VA should be getting any bonuses until vets are getting the benefits they are legally entitled to in a timely fashion.

(in reply to soultoshare)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 1:24:38 PM   
DommeChains


Posts: 415
Joined: 3/23/2006
Status: offline
I am so not surprised.  Dismayed and heartbroken but not surprised.  The gulf between what the "average" employee makes and what upper management makes in either arena....public domain or private sector.... is the largest it has ever been in this country.  People like me bust our asses doing the work of  2 or 3 folks with few resources, no raises for years!! and every year reduced benefits while being told the money is not there for raises, for employer paid health plan premiums, etc.

Add in the insult of denying services to veterans who literally risked life and limb and I want to cry and beat the stuffing out of someone.  I am a Vietnam era vet and in the past, when working full time but for someone who had no health benefits I was given the most insulting run around trying to access health care I am entitled to through the VA.

The status of how America as a whole does business and how we do, or rather don't, provide access to basic level decent health care in this country are two of the most critical issues we as a society face.

Folding up soapbox now and going back into the trenches to do what little I can to provide some of that basic health care.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 1:43:36 PM   
Aubre


Posts: 478
Joined: 12/9/2004
Status: offline
The mission of the VA should be treated like a sacred trust. To care for those who would lay their lives down to protect Americans - there can be no higher calling.

(in reply to DommeChains)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" - 5/3/2007 5:16:26 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
General reply -
 
Call, e-mail and write letter to your elected representatives to protest this waste of the tax payers money.
And demand better treatment for our veterans, both short term and long term care.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Aubre)
Profile   Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> "Lawmakers want VA to explain bonuses" Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063