sissymaidlola
Posts: 518
Joined: 3/27/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
And obviously you have unresolved growing issues which you chose to vomit onto this thread. Well, sissy doesn't know if they are "unresolved growing issues" but if you read enough of Karen's posts on other threads you would know that sissy's comments are based on a firm basis of fact. You don't have to agree with those comments any more than sissy has to agree with your own vomited comments. And, of course, if you haven't read the same posts and observed the same hijacking process going on elsewhere you probably won't agree with them. Was what Karen posted here the most egregious example of such hijacking ? No, it wasn't. But since she posted here accusing sissy of doing the very thing she was actually guilty of herself (namely, reading something into sissy's posts that wasn't relevant) and causing him to address that issue anyway, he decided to also address the other issue here, too. Out of context it may seem severe to you, and sissy won't dispute that impression, but context is EVERYTHING. Whichever thread sissy had addressed this issue on would have been out of context for only that thread. quote:
I also didn't see anything about the household being mentioned and the fact is that larger breasts is a known cause of back pain. The term "household" was merely used as an alternative way of referring to Karen and Holly. As for the latter point made in that sentence you need to improve your comprehension levels ... that point was made a number of times by Karen across a number of her posts. Your own post here about "overall body and breast size" that sissy posted against was the trigger for that issue. See, this is ultimately all your fault! <giggles> quote:
I think sissy needs to cool out. What was disapproving of her mentioning barbie doll? If you took a generic barbie doll and made her into human proportions she would be VERY badly off due to her breast size. (don't let Mattell sue me for that ok?) Go read that post again, Emerald. sissy Doesn't believe breast size has anything to do with the Barbie doll remark ... the implication is simply that having a Barbie doll figure is in of itself the problem. But that is all bye the bye. The remark was quite disparaging towards Minx: "if she's shaped like a Barbie doll, it would be no wonder that she has back trouble (as I don't know her proportions, I can't say for sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if that is at least part of the problem)" although admittedly prepended by the "if" so it's all OK, isn't it ? Try this on for size, Emerald: "sissy Doesn't know you from Adam, but if he did, he would say unequivocally that you were a totally stupid moron." Is that an insult ? Sure feels like one, doesn't it ? But sissy qualified it with the "if" clause, and since he doesn't, in fact, know you from Adam, the latter part of that conditional statement is not true and therefore it's not actually an insult. But it still feels like one, doesn't it ? That construct is a standard way of inflicting all the emotional trauma of an insult on someone while maintaining plausible denial for the insult should you get called on it. quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola sissy Did not read anything into your post ... Except that it was a self-centered personalize rant to take the focus onto her and disapproving of "barbie dolls". Now you are playing around with the chronology of posts. Even if sissy did read what you claim into a post, it was at a later time in the post to which you responded, and that post is NOT the same one that is referred to in the quote. What you just did was a totally disingenuous juxtaposition to create an apparent contradiction where there was none, and you well know it, Emerald! quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: sissymaidlola You started your initial post against sissy: "It's not about just weight - as Emerald pointed out, it's about proportions ..." So her post was against you? And she's the self-centered one? The term "to post against someone" means to respond to their post directly. sissy Posted against your post and then Karen posted against his ... that was her "initial post against sissy." quote:
So how exactly did THIS post bear relevance and help Minx out? That post didn't help Minx out, but this one hopefully did. sissy's Later post simply called SweetDommes on her b.s. like this one calls you on yours! quote:
Hmm this entire post is a little smoking isn't it? I promise to be cool now. :) You said it, Emerald. sissy Has done you the courtesy of seriously addressing the points in your post (and not simply ignoring it as a flame) but he is not going to get into a flame war with you. Please let it go now. sissy maid lola
_____________________________
If i don't seem submissive to You, it may be because i'm NOT submissive to You.
|