DsrtMyst -> RE: Dominant Slaves? (5/10/2005 5:05:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Archer A dominant personality is independant of the heart or calling to be a slave. In this case it is a language problem because dominant is and adjetive in the case of the term domianant slave and a noun in the case of a Dominant. I have believed this for some time. Submissive is also an adjective. And submissive does not equal passive. Adjectives can be attached to any noun and you end up with dominant slaves, submissive tops, and passive Masters. I tend to avoid using either dominant or submissive as nouns since they are personality traits and reflect a manner of interaction in a relationship, not the full identity/role/position of a person. In my household the Master is the authority and shoulders the responsibility. The slave surrenders to that authority and serves the Master and the household. Neither position requires a person to be dominant. Neither position requires a person to be submissive. slaveDaddy is a strong-willed, dominant slave. I am a strong, passive Master with a dominant streak that comes when I feel it is needed and not in response to manipulative bottoms nor to external opinions that a Master should always "act dominant." I submit to my family, my employer, my cats, the Universe, and quite often to the needs of my relationship. My slave has surrendered (not submitted) his body, mind, heart, and life to my authority and guidance. There are times when he takes a dominant position in our sexual activities and I appear more submissive, but neither of us forgets for an instant who has the authority and who serves. There are times when I decide I want to dominate him into submitting in some area and those can be very transformative (and hot!), but they in no way define our relationship our even our core personalities.
|
|
|
|