CuriousLord -> RE: How does your label affect your view of others? (5/6/2007 11:30:50 PM)
|
I wouldn't say my label of myself so much as my labeling system effects my views of others. I believe it's foolish to believe there's a definate system of labels- this person is a sub, that guy over there's a Dom, this girl's a switch.. Instead, I believe it's important to understand what one's own identity means to themself. Such as, I label myself a "Master". In my "Masterhood" thread, I elaborated on what I mean by this. While others share views similar to my own, many others do not. For these people, there may be disagreements on what to label an individual. Therefore, I would say that I am a "Master" in my system, as there is no absolute system and I can not claim to be certain everyone would call me a "Master" in their own system. On this note, I believe most have similar ideas of what a sub is versus what a Dom is. What a slave is versus what a Master is. Some general agreement on differences between the Dom/sub dynamic, the top/bottom dynamic, and the Master/slave dynamic. This can allow labels to be useful without explicitly defining the system in which they are derived as the general system, though vague, is still useful. I conclude that labels are for vague understandings until more detailed understandings come about and that labels are relative to the system in which they are referential. I would empathesize that associating the referential system to a more specific usage of a label is important to its understanding.
|
|
|
|