blacksilk -> RE: Does size matter? (1/13/2009 10:14:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sobayblackmaster quote:
ORIGINAL: Sweetdarkluv The more time I spend in this lifestyle, the more I realize how little of it involves my dick. Actually I have a problem with that mindset. In fact as I recall that was the thing that always bothered me about bondage porn-there was never any real sex, just buildup. Maybe it's me. quote:
ORIGINAL: blacksilk <FR> Yes, size matters and so does the aptitude of the owner of said appendage. Large and inept is bad enough but at least you got something to build on. Small and inept is just...um...well, is just a raw deal. The perspective one (male that is) takes depends on which side of the matter one's equipment lies. I have this notion that no guy who is well endowed has a problem with it. So does that mean it doesn't matter or that it's a non issue? I totally agree that visually and logistically more is better, but I also know that it's the technique, as well as the instrument that makes the music sweet. Italicized are the statements which this girl finds contradictory. Not all well-endowed men have the technique to make sweet music: some just scrape the bow back and forth hoping for something that sounds remotely tuneful, depending solely on the size and strength of said bow instead of any aptitude for playing. But at least they have the head start of a decent instrument and can learn to read music. It is agreed that the technique is important and some (very few mind you, but some) smaller musicians do have the skill to make the whole contata harmonious. Again, it boils down to "the aptitude of the owner of said appendage".
|
|
|
|