kc692 -> RE: Just joined and (5/28/2005 6:03:08 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ElektraUkM quote:
ORIGINAL: kc692... I must say also, as a new member, your profile says submissive, yet your "walk and talk" bespeaks belligerence not generally tolerated in a sub. Hello kc692, just using your comment because it illustrates my point, and apologies if this isnt' what you meant or what you believe. But my point is: Surely subs are free to submit only to that person/people they've Agreed to submit to? No sub has to prove their submissive qualities by trying to please anyone and everyone. ~ Elektra I don't think my meaning was quite clear, Elektra, or didn't state it correctly. At the very least, let me expand(no offense taken, that is what discussion of views are for). I do not expect that someone who is submissive, automatically submit to me or anyone else that is or claims to be domme. I would not expect that from anyone, except for one I was involved with. What I meant, was overall, the OP started a post with open beliigerence to dommes at large, and throughout the post, has stated that some of his worries concerned specific tasks that he was willing or not to do, to be determined by him. This was not only money, but service issues, etc. It just seemed to me, IMO, that, although, I totally agree with what you stated (any more than I think I dominants should be expected to be dominant towards everyone, any more than a sub be submissive towards everyone) the OP has seemed like he wanted to be in control of the direction of the relationship he was in: quote:
I am into equality and like to serve a Domme so long as its not a rip-off quote:
However I dont find that doing someone plumbing in Exchange for some whipping is really a BDSM relationship...sorry There are better quotes from him to illustrate my point throughout this thread, but it is early, and I do not have enough caffeine in my brain yet. Again, he is welcome to his views, and do whatever he wants. My statement would be more accurate to restate as : you state you are a submissive, but I think you will have a hard time finding a domme that will conform herself to your desires, as a submissive, when you found a domme, you would be expected to submit to her desires, not the other way around. I think you will have a hard time with this attitude of checklists of acceptable and unacceptable behavior (besides the money issue). I think that a lot of Dommes would not interpet this as having a submissive nature. I am not addressing the money, I am addressing everything else the OP stated. I did not mean my statement to be inflammatory, I am just being honest in my opinion. He is free to have whatever attitude he would like, he is not my submissive. I also want to state, Elektra, I do not want my boys or girls to have no mind, and never state an opinion or have no independent thoughts. However, I will not have them dictate to me, or decide, (other than hard limits) what and when service, play, rewards, discipline, etc. are going to happen, and what they are going to consist of. Someone that does that, especially in the beginning, like this, just does not bespeak a submissive attitude in general. However, I wish him luck in his quest.
|
|
|
|