RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


crouchingtigress -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/23/2007 11:35:39 PM)

aloha barlee...*waves*
 
i am popping in to a. say hi, as that i am not here anymore really ....and b, to offer my POV on switches.  this is a very simplified version.
 
if you are not gay you cant understand, truly understand, what it is like, just as if you are not a hunter you wont ever understand the experience of killing.
 
the thing is you think you do, but you dont and honestly wont because you cant. i dont understand folks that dont switch, i think i do, but all that is, is information that is masquerading as knowledge, based on all my vast experience with non -switchers.
 
but the heart of your question and why i decided to de-lurk is that i hear you saying you have all these friends and you want to understand them better, and to me i read that as wanting to love them more...and honestly you dont have to understand a person to love them... all you have to do is love them.




littlesarbonn -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 12:38:48 AM)

I try to avoid "defining" these types of terms that people on the Internet really feel so passionate about. I know what TPE and D/s means to me, but I'm way past the desire to argue with people about what they mean. I remember the days in the infancy of the Internet when people not in a relationship felt the need to argue with me about whether or not the relationship I WAS in happened to be a TPE relationship. People kept trying to define my relationship, as if they were involved in it somehow, throwing out all sorts of no-win situations that were ludicrous and uninvited.




MsParados -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 11:52:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bearlee

Ya know, kane; comments like that would be a lot like my saying that a guy all dressed in leathers standing next to a chain on the wall...holding a paint-stick... is obviously NO dominant.
 
Ya just cannot make sweeping statements like that!  You are obviously hanging around with the wrong kind of people…or a limited number of them.  There ARE many, many Dominant men and women who enjoy some degree of pain, and so, occasionally bottom. 
 
To make the statement that there is little difference between submission and bottoming shows a serious lack of both information and experience. 
 
You might wanna read some stuff…you are seriously in the minority here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsParados
...
He likes pain, hell he'll hurt himself if no one else is around the S and the M are both part of him but he would never bottom, not even if his life depended on it.
...
If a Dom liked getting peed on, I wouldn't think that would make him a switch, just a Dom that has a fetish for watersports. 

 
MsP…I would say the same to you; to hold what your man does as the be-all, end-all by which to measure everybody else is ludicrous.  I know plenty of Dominant people who enjoy pain…and enjoy others administering to their needs from time to time. 
 
Bottoming has nothing to do with submission.
 
And…I couldn’t agree more about the watersports!  Same goes for anal sex…but I suspect that is yet another argument!  LOL
 
B


In no way did I suggest it, he or our way of life was the end all be all but now that you mention it.... it is for us. My point was to separate the idea that bottoming and having a masocistic side where the same thing, or go hand in hand all the time. Some here have said that "they bottom, to their submissive when getting a back rub." that is not bottoming.
IMO and experince, when you bottom you are giving over some control, just like if you are into bondage, it may not be alot of control but their is some involved, it's simplely a view on human behavior. To say that bottoming has "nothing" to do with submission is a myopic view of being a bottom. For some bottoming is the beginning of their submission, it is a process of growth and trust. It doesn't mean they are "less" of a submissive, just that they are exploring the feeling they have.
The problems arise when individuals feel superior about the way they are wired and disparage others unlike them. it's that whole "US" against "Them" thing that kills.
I felt you seem to think that I disagree that Dom men can't bottom, I don't at all I have been a round a few blocks in my time and can only hope you replied to me in such a manner because others had you all riled up..




Bearlee -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 12:15:53 PM)

Amyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!  How nice to see you, sweetie! 
 
Ya know…you have made an awesome point!  I think the reason for asking all these questions IS to better understand ME, though…
 
I’m bi, I switch…the older I get the fewer limits I have and the broader are the labels I see.  Life is interesting.  And you made a beautiful point.  Thank you…
 
Beverly




earthycouple -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 4:06:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SireKane

Beverly,

I commend you for having the strength and wisdom to address and seek advice regarding this concern. Most women don't ask until it is too late. You have a friends who identifies as a dominant, but says he's equally comfortable being submissive, and that he would allow you to choose his role in your relationship. This is bullshit!!!  Step away from the keyboard, and run like hell!!! A dominant man is not equally comfortable being a submissive man.  Your friend is a submissive man who is going to play any role that you are comfortable with until he is sure that you are emotionally invested in him. When he is confident that you are bonded emotionally, he's going to reveal to you that he is truly submissive man. He'll be banking that the emotional bond that you have established with him will keep you in the relationship. This is a commom ruse. Buyer beware.

Kane


methinks Kane is onto something here....the overall discussion so far has been great.




Bearlee -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 5:16:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsParados
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bearlee

Exactly PN...  There are lots of Doms (and vanilla men, too), who enjoy being Topped in any sense.  It could be a slightly agressive 'need' to give him a blow-job, it could be just being on top for sex.  It might be anal sex...just probing or even a strap-on!  Perhaps one likes watersports; of the sensuous kind...rather than humiliation.  I've done all that sorta stuff with perfectly vanilla guys and just do NOT see it as 'turning Dom'.  

*raises hand slighty* umm not to throw more into the mix but do not confuse Toping/bottom with the Sado/maso side...they do not always go together.
from personal experince here and just .02 so bare with me.
sexually I am damn near always the "agressor", a vicious cock swallower and for the last year on Top has been the position for every intercourse... but I never ever ever top my Daddy. He likes pain, hell he'll hurt himself if no one else is around the S and the M are both part of him but he would never bottom, not even if his life depended on it. He believes even in bottoming, you are still giving up some control. Mental space and play is very big for us and it is essiential that some areas do not over lap... He is not above putting me back in my place if he felt I was taking TO much liberty with my aggressive behaviors.

(I know I'm gonna get it but ) imo a switch, an honest switch ( one who has taken the time to discover their own needs and abilities) it is not based so much on activities as personalities.

If a Dom liked getting peed on, I wouldn't think that would make him a switch, just a Dom that has a fetish for watersports. 
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsParados

In no way did I suggest it, he or our way of life was the end all be all but now that you mention it.... it is for us. My point was to separate the idea that bottoming and having a masocistic side where the same thing, or go hand in hand all the time. Some here have said that "they bottom, to their submissive when getting a back rub." that is not bottoming.
IMO and experince, when you bottom you are giving over some control, just like if you are into bondage, it may not be alot of control but their is some involved, it's simplely a view on human behavior. To say that bottoming has "nothing" to do with submission is a myopic view of being a bottom. For some bottoming is the beginning of their submission, it is a process of growth and trust. It doesn't mean they are "less" of a submissive, just that they are exploring the feeling they have.
The problems arise when individuals feel superior about the way they are wired and disparage others unlike them. It’s that whole "US" against "Them" thing that kills.
I felt you seem to think that I disagree that Dom men can't bottom, I don't at all.   I have been a round a few blocks in my time and can only hope you replied to me in such a manner because others had you all riled up.. 
 

MsP… Point well taken and I’d say I owe you an apology…I WAS a bit keyed up.  No excuse…I beg your pardon.
 
I guess after the first guy…to read that your man likes pain, likes hurting himself if no one else is around but would never, ever bottom (even if his life depended on it) was somehow STATING it’s because he’s Dom.  You did NOT say that…  Even to say he believes to do so is submitting.  So again… I apologize.  I will say though, that I hope others don’t read this as the case…because more often than not, I don’t think it is.  The maso Doms I know…thoroughly enjoy bottoming…much like Whip describes…and there is not a submissive bone in their bodies. 
 
You suggest bottoming is the beginning of submission…again, I disagree…but you did not suggest anything other than your opinion.  And…we disagree.  <shrugs> 
 
And THAT is what makes Forums so interesting.  <Extends olive branch>
B
 




Bearlee -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 5:23:07 PM)

littlesarbonn,
 
I cannot imagine others trying to tell you what was up with your own relationship!  Ugg… With this thread, I was trying to get my head around a few things.  It is possible I am headed in a direction I never knew possible; I dunno… but I was just looking to kick a topic around some. 
 
For the most point, I know what TPE and D/s mean to me, too and I don’t really want to argue the point…but figure out the different ways those concepts are included in Switchy relationships.  Sometimes I have a difficult time, on my own, seeing how something looks from a different perspective.  This helps me.
 
Again…thank you all for your contributions.  Open minded people are such a delight!!!
 
B
 
PS...Congrats on your book!!!  [:)]




Bearlee -> RE: D/s and TPE..........and switching? (5/24/2007 5:29:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SireKane
Yanna, excellant idea, but most men who are tops would not use such a designation. The majority of submissive women I know want a dominant man, not a top.  I cannot remember ever coming across any submissive women profiles which state that they are looking for a male tops. Try to find dominant male profile which states that he bottoms. It's a good idea, but I think not enough people would be honest about themselves. Good luck. 


Now isn't this odd?  I for one know many many women who enjoy Tops!  I am not owned...so...sometimes I look to get Topped.  Being Topped allows me to learn about thall the 'tools' of the trade...but in a fun, controlled situation.  Also, I like to Top...there are lots of submissives around who, not being owned or being new, LOVE to get Topped.  There is a physicality to it, for me...a joy in the exchange.  What's not to like???
 
Perhaps one reason we don't see more of this requested online is because thus far the options are Dom and sub or Tom and bottom!
 
Just some thoughts,
B




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.076172E-02