jauntyone
Posts: 543
Joined: 2/27/2007 From: Anchorage Alaska Status: offline
|
Greetings as already mentioned here, I am allowed to call him only two names; Master or Sir. I mistakingly, once, called him by his first name; a mistake that I will never repeat quote:
Not to hijack this thread or anything, but I think the bigger issue here is WHY someone would choose to be owned by a Master OR a Mistress that considers them to be "cattle." That is what is absolutely DISRESPECFTUL in my opinion and I wonder how a sub or slave could even have respect for a Master like that in the first place. I certainly wouldn't. In my opinion, a slave IS to be "cherished, adored or whatever you want to call it." If you have that sort of closeness with them, why not have some sort of "pet names" for each other. Then again, that is up to the two individuals involved. Furthermore, I also think that the poster KNEW he was going to get some responses like this when he posted it. He probably wanted to "create a stir." Be well, M. Diva Greetings gothicdiva there is nothing disrespectful about Master referring to me as property, cattle, an animal...anything he wishes. I am his property, he may call me anything he wishes What many fail to understand is that even while he is referring to me as such, it does not diminish his love for me or mine for him. It is a statement of ownership; nothing more and nothing less. I wish you well melissa
|