slaverosebeauty
Posts: 1941
Joined: 12/12/2004 From: Cali Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Masque66 Just something that bothered me. I was reading a profile where the sub had written, "Let's play in our own leagues, shall we?" Implying that far too many unattractive people had messaged her. Now I may not be a perfect 10, but I'm at least reasonably attractive, but what killed me was that looking at her photo, neither was she. Now, I can understand not wanting to be with someone you're not attracted to. But if Ron Jeremy and Hugh Heifner have taught me anything, it's that looks aren't everything. I've seen plenty of girls I thought 'out of my league' holding hands and making out with men who looked so astoundingly ordinary. And just a further note, you don't get to play in that league forever. Ok so this wasn't really a discussion, I just can't stand hubris. Ok.. about Ron Jermey and Hugh Heifner, lets be VERY honest its all about $$$ with why women like them, pure and simple. I have gotten emails from men who say that I am 'no in' their leage as far as looks go, then when I look at this pics I laugh; I am not be everyone's definition of 'ideal' but, I don't scare men away either, heck, I will have my own site up by the end of the year {if we get enough feedback on that idea}, an I am signing a contract by the end of June to model with a new site {excited}, so I think I have 'something' that someone wants to see and likes. What makes me attracted to someone is a mix of who they are [personality, chemistry, etc] and how they look, if we might want to have children together, then I do put a little more emphisis on looks, but, all in all, I do go by the person NOT the looks. Its the WHOLE package, not the cover or the material alone.
_____________________________
http://slaverosebeauty.livejournal.com/ "Friends live on in our hearts, regardless if they are here or not."
|