RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


CuriousLord -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/25/2007 10:21:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Statistical laws hold as a matter of scientific observation.


Have to disagree with you there. They may hold as a matter of mathematics or logic.


It's scientific.  Being able to flip a coin's simple enough proof for that.  For more information on experiments, I'd check Wikipedia.


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

But no law related to infinity can be based on observation. Who's observed infinity?


Disagreed.  Infinity is simply a large number without bounds.  From Calculus, we can see numerous, direct implications of this.

But, in the very basics, they're self-evident truths that follow from observing the approaches of increasing finitie values.

Further, to observe, one might observe indirectly.  We have observed- and failed to observe- many phenomina in nature about infinity.

Edit:  We better continue this in private.  Real's brought up our highjacking.




dcnovice -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/25/2007 10:27:59 PM)

quote:

We have observed- and failed to observe- many phenomina in nature about infinity.


Such as?





dcnovice -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/25/2007 10:30:20 PM)

quote:

We better continue this in private.  Real's brought up our highjacking.


Has he complained? The thread he started for you and someone else (not me) is about the speed of light, I think.

However, I actually do need to go to bed, so I shall lay the topic to rest. Good night, all.




CuriousLord -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/25/2007 10:45:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Such as?


Lack of particles traveling at c (to tease Real :P).
Number of lines possible to draw perpendicular to a figure defined as all the points equildistant from another in more than one diminsion.
The inverse of the chance of any impossible event.
Number of posts I've answered today.

Edit:  Ohh, you're right about Real's new thread.  I forgot about someone here having an alias with "girl" in it, and I didn't know your gender, so I thought he may've been referring to you (as it seemed likely since I thought we've done the biggest hjiack of this thread in the last couple pages).  My bad.




girl4you2 -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/25/2007 10:54:06 PM)

fast reply:

i'm the girl; the green one. i did admit to hijacking this thread last night, and i've been a party to kinda helping it go that way again today. it's also sorta blending with the other one about literal translations and acceptance.

never had a thread named partially for me before *gosh*




luckydog1 -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 3:01:08 AM)

"Wouldn't you say you're confusing faith with fact..? "  Show me something I have asserted as fact, except for the fact that your proof is based on a couple of untested hypothesis on informnation with absolutly no hard data.  There is no basis for assigning God characteristics of life as we know it.  To do so is to misstate Chrisitian theology, which is a strawman argument.  Where again on the page you assert agrees 100% with your description of Christian Theology, does it say God has Micromeres, hence is goverened by the rules of life as we know it?  I challenged you on this before, and you ducked the question.

Time is part of our universe, and was created with it, many scientists believe this.  Is it true as a fact?  I can not say, neither can you.  Gods existance ,by theological definition predates the existance of our universe.  And theology holds that he will ocntinue to exist after our universe is no more.  Is our universe perhaps simply a part of a larger multiverse, perhaps, but there is no basis to assert it as fact.

I continue to assert that your proof is based on misdefining theology (strawman) and substituting opinion for Fact (error B), hence is not a valid proof.  I am going to be off line for the weekend, going up to camp and perform at a Music Festival out in the woods.  Hope everyone has a great weekend.




luckydog1 -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 3:03:30 AM)

Last thought, you assert there is no chance of things happening that can not, regardless of how many times it is played out.  Perhaps it is not an acutal possabillity for God to die, that is what Christian theology would hold.




Real0ne -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 4:38:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Statistical laws hold as a matter of scientific observation.


Have to disagree with you there. They may hold as a matter of mathematics or logic.


It's scientific.  Being able to flip a coin's simple enough proof for that.  For more information on experiments, I'd check Wikipedia.


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

But no law related to infinity can be based on observation. Who's observed infinity?


Disagreed.  Infinity is simply a large number without bounds.  From Calculus, we can see numerous, direct implications of this.

But, in the very basics, they're self-evident truths that follow from observing the approaches of increasing finitie values.

Further, to observe, one might observe indirectly.  We have observed- and failed to observe- many phenomina in nature about infinity.

Edit:  We better continue this in private.  Real's brought up our highjacking.



nah i wouldnt try and put the kabash on you all having fun :)

That was a note to CL that i put up a vid for him in the other thread about some of the amazing things he may that will defy reasoning if they ever figure it out.  LOL




mnottertail -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 4:49:15 AM)

I am not insane, just terribly misunderstood.

Ron 




Real0ne -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 5:27:41 AM)

i do not recall god ever being related as a "force" in christian theology

i think the force is out of the first episode of star wars.


God

existence of, 31, 33-35, 46, 48, 286, 2127
greatness of, 41, 223, 272, 283, 300, 306, 1147
heaven as God's own place, 326
image of, 370, 399, 844, 1549, 1702, 1705, 2129-32
Kingdom of (see Kingdom of God)
People of (see People of God)
providence of (see Providence)
Son of (see Christ)
Spirit of (see Holy Spirit)
Word of (see Word of God)
See also Trinity

adoration, prayer, and the worship of God
commandment to adore and serve Him, 2083-94, 2095-109, 2133-36
creation with a view to, 347
departure from the worship of, 2138
Eucharist as thanksgiving and praise of, 1359-61, 1408
family as the first community honoring, 2207
glorification of, 824
in the liturgy, 1110
the "Lord's Prayer" (see "Our Father," the prayer)
means and instruments for giving glory and praise to, 1123, 1162, 1670-71, 1678, 1698, 2062, 2641
occasions for, 1164, 1167, 1174, 2502, 2513
offering sacrifices to God, 2099
prayer of praise must rise up to God, 2589, 2639, 2649
praying to, 2664, 2800
sabbath as the Lord's Day, 2168-173, 2189
significance of, 2097, 2628
Sunday as the Lord's Day, 2174-88, 2190-95
tabernacle and church as places favorable for, 1183, 2691

Almighty God
attributes of God's omnipotence, 268
God, Father and omnipotent, 268-78
God's almighty power is righteous and not arbitrary, 271
"He who is mighty has done great things for me," 273
importance of knowing about almighty God, 274, 278
manifestations of divine omnipotence, 277, 312, 315
mystery of God's apparent powerlessness, 272-74
universal omnipotence, 269
works of divine omnipotence, 311, 997, 1004

Creator of the universe and of man, 279, 324
carries out His plan, 302-14, 320-24
cause, reason, and purpose of creation, 293-94, 319, 760
creates
all things visible and invisible, 325, 327, 337-38
an ordered and good world, 299
out of nothing, 296-98
with wisdom and love, 295
the Creator alone, 290, 317
entrusting to man the governance of the world, 1884
first cause, 308
forming man, 362, 371, 704
Lord of life, 2280, 2318
man created in His image, 355-61, 1701-09
possibility of knowing the existence of the Creator, 286
progressively revealing the mystery of creation, 287-88
question of origins of the world, 285
transcends creation and is present to it, 300
upholds and sustains creation, 301

gifts of God
authority, 1899, 1918
beatitude, 1722, 1727
chastity, 2345
communion, 1489
compendium of gifts in the Creed, 14, 1692
contrition, 1452-53
conversion, 1432
earth and its resources, 2402
eternal life, 1016, 1722
faith, 153, 155, 162, 848, 1381
freedom, 1730
God's love for man, 516, 604, 776, 2658
grace, 1608, 1999, 2000, 2005, 2712
greatness of gifts, 1692
health, 169, 620
Holy Spirit, 683, 733-36, 742
human cooperation in fulfilling God's plan, 306-07, 323, 378
intelligence, 1955
Jesus, 603, 614
Law, 1955 (see also Law)
life and physical health, 2288
personal dignity, 2334, 2393
prayer, 2559-61, 2564, 2713
priesthood, 983
purity, 2520

God's actions toward men
apostolate entrusted to the laity, 900
blessing all living things, 1080-81
completing in man what God has begun, 2001
completing the sublime works of the Eucharist, 1325
creating (see God: Creator of the universe and of man)
establishing His people, 781
forgiving sins, 208, 1440-42
giving grace, 1996, 2008, 2021, 2023-24
giving the Holy Spirit, 741, 1993
God's goodness (see Goodness)
infusing the theological virtues into the souls of the faithful, 1812-13, 1840
leading with the moral law, 708, 1776, 1950-51, 1961, 1975, 1981, 2063
moving the will of man to the good, 17, 51-52, 152-54, 162, 179, 1724, 1742, 1811-13, 1817, 1821, 1830-31, 1848, 1949, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2001-02, 2008, 2021-22
passing away of justification, 1994, 2020
placing in the human heart the desire for happiness, 1718, 1721, 1725, 1818
promising descendants to Abraham, 706
revealing the Ten Commandments, 2058-59
saving man, 15, 74, 169, 430-31, 1949
sealing a covenant with Israel, 2060
sending Jesus, 422, 457-58
showing mercy, 1422, 1846, 1870
speaking to man, 715, 1777, 1795, 2700
transmitting the mission of safeguarding life, 2271
uniting man to God, 950, 1027, 1033, 2305
vocation to
eternal life, 1011, 1998
holiness, 2012-14
the Kingdom, 1726
love, 1604, 2331
prayer, 2567, 2591
reconciliation, 1442
truth, 160, 410

man's actions toward God
being dedicated by consecration to the service of, 931, 934-44, 1579
being reconciled to, 980, 1445, 1462, 1468, 1484, 1493, 1496
believing in, 150-51, 199, 222-27, 1266, 1842
contemplating, 97, 1028
conversion to, 1428, 1431-32
entering into communion with, 197, 367, 518, 613, 737, 1071, 1472, 1540, 2565
filial adherence to, 2609
loving as the first and greatest commandment, 2055, 2083
negative
to effect injuries against, 398, 1440, 1487, 1850, 1871, 2277, 2281, 2314, 2324, 2464
separating oneself from, 1033, 1035, 1057, 1263, 1607
sinning, i.e., disobeying, 397
tempting, 2139
obeying, 143-44, 154, 2242, 2256
possibility of speaking about, 39-43, 48
responding to God's will, 348, 847, 1026, 2103, 2233, 2822-27
seeing, 163, 1716, 1722, 2518-19, 2557
seeking, 28, 1281, 1501, 2566
serving, 1273, 2424
sharing in the fatherhood of, 2367, 2398
sharing in God's life, 1988, 1997
trusting, 227

name of God
Adonai, 209
"Hallowed be thy name," 2807-15, 2858
holiness of, 2142-49
respect for, 2150-55, 2162-63
revelation of, 203-04, 207
YHWH, Kyrios, 206, 210-11, 213-14, 231, 446

plan of God
acts and deeds contrary with God's design, 1665, 1935, 2387
angels as messengers of, 331
Christ as the center and heart of, 112
the Church in, 7, 751-80, 851
Creation as the foundation of, 280, 315
death of Jesus in, 599-605, 624
desire to fulfill, 2823, 2825, 2860
diversity of persons in, 1937, 1946
economic activity in accord with, 2426
embraces all, 841-42
family in, 2201-06
fulfilling and performing, 332, 571, 670, 686, 1043, 1138, 2683
human rejection of God's plan and its consequences, 1739
intelligence of, 158, 426
Jesus' adherence to, 566, 606-07
man's cooperation in, 2062, 2611, 2738
man's renunciation of, adherence to, and conformity with, 716, 2745
marriage in, 1602-20, 1665
Mary's virginal motherhood in, 502-07, 723, 2617
providence carrying out, 302-14
purposes of, 257, 294, 772
revealed and communicated by Him, 50-64, 474, 1066, 1079
Satan "throws himself across," 2851, 2864

titles and attributes of God
Almighty (see God: Almighty God)

Father, 233, 238-40, 2779-85, 2794-96, 2802
God of the living, 993
Good, 339, 385, 2052
Holy, 208, 1352
Ineffable mystery, 230
Living, 205, 2112, 2575
Love, 214, 218-21, 257, 342
Merciful, 210-11
Pure Spirit, 370
Righteous, 62, 215, 271, 2577
Source of every good and of all love, 1723, 1955, 2465
Source of prayer, 2639
Truth, 214-17

will of God, 2822-27
discerning, 1787
fulfilling, 1260, 1332
responding to, 348


http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/index/g.htm








CuriousLord -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 6:23:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

fast reply:

i'm the girl; the green one. i did admit to hijacking this thread last night, and i've been a party to kinda helping it go that way again today. it's also sorta blending with the other one about literal translations and acceptance.

never had a thread named partially for me before *gosh*

 
This is a big responsibility!  We're going to have to love it, feed it, and make sure it practices safe-hijackings (for reprodutction) when it's older!

Plus, he's gotta play <insert name of random sport> in the major leauges some day!




Real0ne -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 6:32:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

fast reply:

i'm the girl; the green one. i did admit to hijacking this thread last night, and i've been a party to kinda helping it go that way again today. it's also sorta blending with the other one about literal translations and acceptance.

never had a thread named partially for me before *gosh*

 
This is a big responsibility!  We're going to have to love it, feed it, and make sure it practices safe-hijackings (for reprodutction) when it's older!

Plus, he's gotta play <insert name of random sport> in the major leauges some day!



LMAO

She is talking about this thread that i made specifically for her and you unless you are not CL  LOL

http://www.collarchat.com/m_1037499/tm.htm


that and i put it up there as a result of our other conversation when i pointed out that you can wirelessly transmit enough power to run the battleship enterprise off the coast of india from new york, ot fot that matter all of bombay in teslas world but you cannot in einsteins world how can that possbly be?




CuriousLord -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 6:51:45 AM)

It's fine.

As.. disengaging as this may sound- which I truly apologize for- I believe the concepts of mutual interaction, statistics, and time are things one should devote time and study to.  Things that I, despite my opinion of myself, took a good while to think of.  It is unfair to expect others to come to terms with such notions in far less time than it took me.

For the matter of this discussion, I would like to affirm that time is not real- it's a construct; interaction is mutual, should it be intelligent; statistics hold valid.  I fear, though, these are things one might learn in school, but not something I can readily say, 'Hey, this is why' in a sentence or two when there's an absent basis.

Still, any feed back as to the problems with my argument, common, would be appreciated.  I would like to understand why one might believe time to be real, and, should it be possible to elaborte upon, why one might believe a God to be a seperate entity, uneffected by the world.

Yeah, I'll be a bit more on/off today.  Some busy work to do about the house.
Hope it goes well for you.




dcnovice -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 2:26:06 PM)

quote:

Last thought, you assert there is no chance of things happening that can not, regardless of how many times it is played out.  Perhaps it is not an acutal possabillity for God to die, that is what Christian theology would hold.


I'm not sure if it's funny or sad or what that I was thinking about this thread during my pilgrimmage to the coffee shop today, but I more or less landed on the same point. It would seem to me that God's dying would have to be a perceived rather than an actual possibility. Time is still unfolding, after all, so we don't yet know what will happen. We're like people watching a movie (for the first time) who don't yet know if the title character will be alive at the closing credits.

Thought of something else that has me a bit muddled, since I'm admittedly not a logician. A key part of the proof seems to be that God must die and thus is not immortal. But something that has never existed can't die, so the proof appears to be at odds with itself.




dcnovice -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 2:28:17 PM)

quote:

Number of posts I've answered today.


LOL!




Sinergy -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 4:20:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

We better continue this in private.  Real's brought up our highjacking.


Has he complained? The thread he started for you and someone else (not me) is about the speed of light, I think.

However, I actually do need to go to bed, so I shall lay the topic to rest. Good night, all.


I read something in either Astronomy or Discover a few months ago about the largest gamma ray burst ever recorded.  It caused all sorts of havoc on earth.  The source was determined to be some ungodly distant astronomical body, like a black hole or a neutron star.  The distance was something ridiculous like 900 million light years away.

The article made the point that the level of energy was so intense that had the source been in our galaxy, it would have killed every living thing on earth.

Since we know how fast light travels.  We know where and how far away the source of the gamma ray emitter was.  This means that whatever it was that caused the gamma rays to shoot out happened 900 million years ago.

Puts a bit of a damper on the theory that the universe was created 6000 years ago.

Sinergy




Real0ne -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 9:27:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
The distance was something ridiculous like 900 million light years away.

The article made the point that the level of energy was so intense that had the source been in our galaxy, it would have killed every living thing on earth.



what i woudl like to know is how do they come up with this?  i mean i get the impression these guys can look at an odometer or something LOL

What procedure is used for that estimate or guess or whatever it is?




Sinergy -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/26/2007 10:48:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
The distance was something ridiculous like 900 million light years away.

The article made the point that the level of energy was so intense that had the source been in our galaxy, it would have killed every living thing on earth.



what i woudl like to know is how do they come up with this?  i mean i get the impression these guys can look at an odometer or something LOL

What procedure is used for that estimate or guess or whatever it is?




http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-02/sy0rgf021706.php

We have a number of detector satellites and gamma ray antennas.  It is possible to triangulate between two of them and get the distance for the third point on the triangle.

Sinergy




Real0ne -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/27/2007 10:50:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
The distance was something ridiculous like 900 million light years away.

The article made the point that the level of energy was so intense that had the source been in our galaxy, it would have killed every living thing on earth.



what i woudl like to know is how do they come up with this?  i mean i get the impression these guys can look at an odometer or something LOL

What procedure is used for that estimate or guess or whatever it is?




http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-02/sy0rgf021706.php

We have a number of detector satellites and gamma ray antennas.  It is possible to triangulate between two of them and get the distance for the third point on the triangle.

Sinergy



bummer they moved the page, i am interested to see how they can get that kind of accuracy with vitually zero degrees minute of angle.




girl4you2 -> RE: So Why Are All The Genius's Insane? (5/27/2007 11:08:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
bummer they moved the page, i am interested to see how they can get that kind of accuracy with vitually zero degrees minute of angle.


or you could do a web search (google, hotbot, dogpile) and read about it yourself; just an idea.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375