|
chiaThePet -> RE: The Great Domme Migration (5/29/2007 7:50:48 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:
ORIGINAL: chiaThePet
Dearest Diane,
Oh it matters, especially to the pigmales, they only see what they want to see,
and they see "strapon Diane" and nothing else. And might i add, if You're
not seeking a submissive or slave at the moment, why not just delete their
emails unread, makes for efficient use of time so You can devote more to
the "strapon Diane" group. i'm sorry, have i put too much emphasis on that?
Born to serve, chia* "For the love of God, don't help me" (the pet)
i think to use the term "strapon Diane" is very disrespectful. Surely because someone states a prefference for something that isnt the same as saying "I am prepared to do xy &z with everyone" ? i read the word group as simply that, a group of like minded people.
I would suggest most of the messages Maam Diane or DominaSmartass receive, are not written by people who read the forums. Nor people who actually read profiles come to that.
It can be annoying to read that 99% of all subs are fakes, but so what. Include yourself in the elusive 1% , you know if you are genuine or not. So why get hot under the collar ?
[;)]
Well good morning mate, enjoying that toddy? Good.
Now, what did i do with those stripped jammies and underroos?
Oh Dearest DiurnalVampire, i'll be returning to Bitchdom temporarily, though it
would seem a D/s extreme makeover may be the order of the day.
Let's review, particularly those whom have apparently emerged from a London
fog, because i am not a boy who will sugar coat his words just because i think
honey nut "cheerios" are what a Domme wants to consume. Of course the ever
required ass kissing is part and parcel to a passionate servants devotion, however
a Domme is wise enough to know when She is beholding patronization. i prefer to
keep such confined to genuine application, especially when in the midst of a topic
which finds fault with those whom offer counterfeit adoration. Therefore in reply,
and do try to keep up with me here mate, because the evidence would suggest
that you missed a few valid points along the way to your "polite" correction of me.
i was advancing a fair and honest point in my quote, which found a Domme
complaining of "pigmale", (let's reiterate that) not submissive contact whereby
said "pigmales" were forwarding their desire that She f--k them. This from a
Domme whom owns and voluntarily promotes Her group which is aptly
entitled "straponwithDiane", included in Her signature within the forum posts.
Now She doth protest that many of the multitudes which contact Her have
never seen such, and this may be the case, however, complaining on the one
hand of a specific request of "pigmales", and advancing said specific act on
the other for promotion of Her group, simply speaks "ah....what?" to me.
Sometimes wanting it both ways does not produce desired results. i find no
disrespect polite sub, in using the very words promoted of a Domme Herself
when pointing out that "pigmales" will only see such when one hands it to them.
Yes, it will be a group of like-minded people, attracting such, i find no contention
therein, appetite will be what it is. i never said it entitled anyone to ask for x,y,
and z, i specifically made the point that i do not condone "pigmale" behavior.
Your point that most of the messages recieved were most likely not from those
whom have read the forums had already been discussed, and was not an issue
of which i disagreed. It was simply the "having it both ways" which i questioned.
The statement concerning 99% of submissives, actually referred to them being
liars. I advanced the number to 100%, because at some point in our wonderful
lives, we all lie, for whatever reason. You exasperate the issue with your statement
that 99% of submissives are fakes, and so what? <SLAP> Have you not been
paying attention polite sub? The "hot under the collar" issue for me is the ever
so often finding fault with "submissives" grouped as a whole, when in fact it is
the "pigmales" whom should be addressed when being given all that glorious
attention. Call it for what it is, "pigmale" fakes and liars, wolves in sheeps clothing,
fantasy, folly and kink players who garner so much distain, but are mistakenly
given submissive status. i resent such, and it was the catalyst for my own brand
of humor addressng the OP and the topic at large. For doing such, i was slapped
and scolded for entering and addressing a topic in a public forum which was not
meant for me, and i was invited to start my own thread addressing money hungry
whores in a different venue. Well puff, puff, blow smoke in my face when i make
a valid point and i will light a few of my own, all is fair in love and war they say.
So now that the fog has cleared polite sub, perhaps you have a little more
understanding as to the flow of my thought and my rightful application of such.
i simply desire that a "pigmale" be called a "pigmale" here, not a submissive,
and that perhaps just a teensy weensy bit more time be devoted to those whom
offer geniune submissive passion to the fold, and a little less to the "pigmale"
population whom garner so much attention and exposure. Is that so wrong?
i will add that this thread has been carried over to at least one other by a couple
of the lovely Ladies, invoking my name, and in one instance attempting to put
words into my mouth. i have addressed such, and will continue to do so, because
i stand, or kneel before my words, fall where they may, but will not allow another
to define my stance for me, acting as puppeteer and ventriloquist to advance Her
own agenda. Morning Ladies!
Have a wonderful day polite sub, and i shall do the same, though i must ponder
this whole money hungry whore thing, remebering that if such exists here, it is
deserving of it's applied title, and not that of "Domme", because to do so would
be a misguided, misuse, and unfair application to the genuine Dommes here.
Born to serve, chia* (the pet)
|
|
|
|
