stella40
Posts: 417
Joined: 1/11/2006 From: London, UK Status: offline
|
Whoa whoa whoa! Hang on a minute here. People saying it's easier to lie online because you miss out on the body language and inflections? Really? I don't see much of a difference. Someone you don't know so well can just as easily lie to your face as someone you don't know so well writing you an e-mail. Sure, there are signs such as body language in person, but there are also nuances in the written language as well. This is why we have so much literature, English is one of the greatest literary languages in the world. I have a big problem with the OP's theory. How so? Well following the logic of the OP, this would mean actors would have problems interpreting Shakespeare or any other classic playwright for that matter. Most actors working with a script never get to meet the author of that script, so how do they manage to perform Hamlet just as well in London as they do in Toronto? Okay so talent and ability to feel and interpret the language is individual, Tom Hanks cannot play Hamlet like John Malkovich or even Robin Williams, but the written language contains just as many implications, inferences and nuances as the spoken language, if not more. English is also not a standard language, it's individual. It's not only different in the UK from what it is in the USA or Australia, New Zealand or Canada, but also from city to city, town to town and village to village. Someone in Glasgow uses English far differently from someone in London. So does a native New Yorker from someone in Florida. Your use of English changes with your surroundings, your environment and even the people you associate with. This is why whenever a native English speaker opens their mouth you can usually immediately work out where they come from, whether they've been educated or not, what their possible vocation is and so many other things. Online most people can tell if they're dealing with a male or a female, someone old or someone young. Written English contains just as many clues as spoken English. You cannot write without thinking - it's impossible. And it's been known since Ancient Greece that written language, like spoken language contains three things - ethos (your own individual character), logos (logic, or logical thinking) and pathos (or emotion). And are you trying to tell me you cannot tell roughly how someone is feeling when they write something to you? It is generally when someone perceives that it is easier for others to be dishonest and more prone to lying online that they succumb to floccipaucinihilipilification (writing something off as worthless) but I don't believe that it makes a difference whether you're communicating online or face to face - trust takes time to establish and develop.
< Message edited by stella40 -- 6/1/2007 6:40:55 PM >
_____________________________
I try to take one day at a time, but several days come and attack me at once. (Jennifer Unlimited) If you can't be a good example then you'll just have to be a horrible warning.
|