Faramir
Posts: 1043
Joined: 2/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Hollllllly crap this is a great thread--I'm dying laughing over here. I'm actually crying. "Your mangina is showing, you need to put it back under your slip, cowboy up and quit sniffling" is priceless, and a crybaby doms section would RAWK. Dude, you gotta chill. You asked a really, really stupid question that reflected petulance on your part. You asked your "question" with a rhetorical purpose in mind: you hoped to persuade people that you were noble and being victimized, and you hoped for validation. You didn't get that--you are apparently lower and less mature in your social skills than the forum members here, and your intent was nakedly obvious. A bunch of us who undestood your rhetoric, and had contempt for it, told you so in very direct terms. Now, that's all water under the bridge. By continuing to defend a completely untenable position, by repeating what you know to be false over and over again, you are exposing yourself to greater and greater ridicule--the exact opposite of your intent here. If you had, or if you will, stop stonewalling and just admit the truth, you would immediately be perceived in a better light, because the ability to admit a mistake, to recognize a self-failing, is a hallmark of maturity. If your next post was something like, "You know, I was really steamed last nigth, and I decided just to step back for a day and come back, and I do see how my post looked now. I guess I was just disspointed in all these people not giving me a chance to talk, but then again, I do see that it isn't dishonest on their part. I guess just dissapointing," you would win some friends here, cast yourself in a positive light. Before you post again, just think about it. I'm sorry I was confusing with my "construction" comment--I used the word in a particular sense that not everyone is or should be familiar with. In the humanities, we use 'construction" to mean beliefs or cognitive modes that we create, as opposed to being organix or "natural." An example would be in Victorian England, the idea that women were "naturally" weak, irrational, morally superior to men. What the Victorians saw as a natural turth, we would generally see now as a social construction, and a false one at that. It can also be used in a personal sense, in Personal Construction Theory.
_____________________________
True masters, true subs and slaves, X many years in the lifestyle, Old Guard this and High Protocol that--it's like a convention of D&D nerds were allowed to have sex once, and they decided to make a religion out of it.
|