undergroundsea
Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004 From: Austin, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Yes its a scam but one everyone is aware of from the start. Far less painful than someone using your emotions to obtain money. I agree with you that there are more painful scams and greater evils. This issue itself is a minor one but it provides a basis for a philosophical discussion to consider ideas that apply at a more general level. The question I am focusing on is not how big of a scam it is and whether others do it, but whether it is a scam. If everyone is aware from the start, then I don't think it is a scam. I am not convinced that premise--that everyone is aware from the start--holds universally true. I expect she probably tries to hide that the body is not the same as the voice. I am not convinced by the argument that as long as a person doesn't know that that would bother him, it is fine. Under that argument, the two examples I give in my post above--a man pretending to be a woman in a text medium, and a person using a false photo for an online relationship--become acceptable. Under that argument, it is fine for a restaurant to falsely claim they use vegan products or kosher products and serve customers who visit them for this reason. Under that argument, it is fine for one spouse to cheat on another so long as the other does not find out. quote:
ORIGINAL: petdave On the other hand, if what she is selling through her website is fantasy fulfillment, then in practical terms is there really a difference if or how she uses her staff/cast of characters, as long as the fantasy is still brought to life for the consumer? Definitely a gray area. I agree and wrestled with this perspective myself. Through the course of this discussion and reflection, I have to come to lean more towards the scam side. There are adjustments that could make this more benign: rather than a voice over, training the girls, or indicating that staff that responds may not be the same as in the photo. I think this matter is of small practical importance in the big picture but one that is more relevant towards a cerebral exercise via a philosophical discussion. quote:
ORIGINAL: HeavansKeeper a guy will pick up the phone and sound like Apu from The Simpsons, but say his name is 'Hank' (A guy names Hank voices Apu =P) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000279/ In my opinion, if the guy is saying his name is Hank in attempt to make the caller think the call center is based in New York, then yes, it is misleading. If the guy is using an alias of Hank because his name is one that is uncommon and hard to remember or say, then it is not misleading. Because of the accent, and now with greater awareness about outsourced call centers, I think the second scenario is more likely. As I type this, I see that this point about general awareness ties back to the comment made by PoliteSub53. To the extent the consumers in the industry in question know that the person with whom they speak is not whom they see in the photos (and it does not matter to them), the issue becomes more acceptable. I do not know to what extent this general awareness holds. I do know a young woman who does phone sex with and without cam. I am of the impression that a conversation with the actual person is common enough to question the notion of general awareness that staff on the phone is different from who is photographed--I am unsure. My two cents. Cheers, Sea
|