Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: creepy crawly consent


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: creepy crawly consent Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 7:46:04 PM   
Joseff


Posts: 505
Joined: 6/2/2007
Status: offline
Humans can create life, and anyone who has knows all there is to know about awe.
Joseff

(in reply to ClassicV)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 8:00:56 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
This is perhaps the strangest thread of all time on CM, and that is sayin something... so I will play along...

While a cricket is as intrinsically as valuable in the universe as I am, I do not think I need  consent from the cricket to take its life. I eat animals, none of which consented to be eaten. I feel no moral objection to this. I will say that there is something extremely creepy about killing other lifeforms for a kink. Personally it squicks me. Killing things in happenstance is one thing, but the wanton destruction of life just to get off is a little odd in my book.

I guess I do not see human beings as being seperate from the rest of nature, and I do not see much wanton destruction of life just for an orgasm in nature. All in all I would say our fellow creatures on planet Earth behave much better than people on the whole. I do not know if we could say they are more moral or not, but all in all I would say that most of animal kind do not take pleasure to kill just to kill. Most do not kill unless hungry. They do not kill things that are not predators or prey for the most part. Most do not kill within their own species for the most part either... so all in all I have to say that most animals are more ethical than many people...

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 8:51:53 PM   
junecleaver


Posts: 1145
Joined: 4/6/2005
Status: offline
So you are saying the only cricket I can engage in BDSM activities with is Jiminy Cricket?


_____________________________


"No one will ever win the battle of the sexes; there's too much fraternizing with the enemy. "
--Henry A. Kissinger

(in reply to Joseff)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 9:30:40 PM   
dawntreader


Posts: 3045
Joined: 11/23/2006
Status: offline
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!

_____________________________

It is choice - not chance - that determines our destiny~
Jean Nidetch

There is a war going on for your mind...if you are thinking, you are winning~
Flobots

(in reply to junecleaver)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 10:06:38 PM   
CitizenCane


Posts: 349
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah

Elsewhere, Aswad has said:

quote:

Again, usual stuff about consent applies. For instance, the one about putting crickets in someone's vagina ... that I have strong opinions about; crickets cannot consent to that. But whether they put a bucketload of polonium in there, I couldn't care less, if both of them find that radiation poisoning rocks their world in a good way.







Clearly I'm missing something, because a bucket of polonium can't consent to anything either. Is the inability to consent supposed to form some kind of shield against the actions of others? To my way of thinking, consent only becomes an issue when an entity is capable of it. Incapacity activates a whole different set of considerations.  When we are in a position to make choices that affect something outside of ourselves that is unable to give or deny consent, we have the responsibility for consequences thrust upon us. However, there is no 'ultimate' arbiter of consequences, and in a practical sense we can only be responsible for those that we can reasonably foresee.  I happen to embrace strongly a policy of 'benevolence' toward others in general, but I can't offer any absolute proof that this is a superior policy to any other, because I can't absolutely define any measure of superiority. Regardless, a policy of benevolence compels me to protect, where I can, entities incapable of consent from undue harm.  In considering this, however, I like to have some evidence that such-and-such action, if allowed, would indeed cause undue harm.  I'm not convinced that a cricket is capable of being distressed, or has any analogs to human emotion, so putting a cricket in a vagina doesn't strike me as any kind of ethical issue. Putting a dog in a blender, however, does, because a dog is capable of feeling distress, pain, terror and so on in ways clearly similar to our own.

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 10:10:49 PM   
imthatacheyouhav


Posts: 1259
Joined: 4/16/2007
Status: offline
Hmmm..i was thinking this was just about some really bizzare kinky sex....i could be wrong....

_____________________________

*if you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything*
**collared July 22 2007 by LordKen**

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 10:22:39 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
I missed that.  How about the consent of all the dust mites you slaughter when you clean your carpet (or wash your pillows)?  Or, even if you're a vegan, the consent of the microscopic little fuckers living on the vegetables you boil?  For that matter, why is it OK to eat vegetables?  Plants are a form of life too.  Or what about the consent of the bacteria you slaughter when you brush your teeth?  Or the opportunistic little fuckers that attack you the instant you scrape your skin?

No one truly believes that it's immoral to do anything to other living beings without their consent.  Some people might say something along those lines, but that only shows how badly they've failed to think the issue through.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah

Elsewhere, Aswad has said:

quote:

Again, usual stuff about consent applies. For instance, the one about putting crickets in someone's vagina ... that I have strong opinions about; crickets cannot consent to that. But whether they put a bucketload of polonium in there, I couldn't care less, if both of them find that radiation poisoning rocks their world in a good way.

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 10:28:39 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ClassicV

Nor, will I deliberately cause pain or suffering for purely my amusement. Similarly, I wouldn't torture a sub if I know it is beyond what is rewarding to them.
.

quote:

ClassicV
That is where intuition and good judgement come in ... to know what WILL be rewarding, even if the sub doesn't know it at the time.


I don't believe this is an honest statement....I believe what your saying is that you hope what you find rewarding she will as well,  There is a difference...And sometimes you will be wrong.

to the op...I don't mourn for the crickets....I guess that would depend on the environment of their demise....Was   it a warm happy place? or one in need of perhaps a much larger predator to be introduced to kill whatever in the hell caused  a lovely vagina to fall on such hard times.

If I were to ever "cricketize a kooch" I don't think I would be dilligent enough to recall how many entered in comparison to how many were retrieved.  I don't think we are talking about a simple concept like that of the "Thunder Twat" where two crickets enter one cricket leaves....In my case I believe it would be more like "Jaws".....

Robert Shaw (Quint):  So, eleven hundred crickets went into her pussy. Three hundred and sixteen crickets come out, her vagina took the rest, June the twenty-ninth, nineteen-forty five. Anyway, we delivered the bomb.

Sub: Did you get all of those crickets out of my pussy?

Domiguy: Almost.

Sub: Almost?.....How in the fuck am I supposed to feel about that?

Domiguy: We have all had to make sacrifices...But we delivered the bomb baby, we delivered the bomb.

< Message edited by domiguy -- 6/3/2007 10:31:25 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to ClassicV)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:15:08 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: charmdpetKeira

I do not see myself taking Mr. Grasshopper out of the grass to put him on the hot pavement though, perhaps because I am female?


~Aswad looks down at his own dangly bits~

No, that can't be the reason.

quote:

When it comes to getting insects to consent, I believe one’s best bet would probably be ants. It has been my experience that they are more then willing participants, in interacting with humans; as a matter of fact, I have found they often invite themselves. What’s up with that? As far as getting them to cooperate, all one has to do is offer a little something to them… honey, jelly, ext.


Indeed. Ants are liable to cooperate, and there are a lot of ways you could get ants to consent (to their standard) to stuff that would qualify as kinky. Where it gets iffy, is when you do something they didn't consent to, and can't back away from, like stepping on them (google crush fetish if you like) or putting them somewhere they can't get back out of (you pick a spot) or putting them somewhere they'll be crushed from the rest of what is going on.

quote:

Personally I would not advise this though. I once drank from a cup that had a stow-away ant in it; the bastard clamped on to the inside of my lip and wouldn’t let go, (made me gag). It also caused me to spit my drink into my shoe. I felt so violated.


~lol~

Sorry for laughing at your misfortune.

I haven't had any trouble with ants that I can recall, but wasps definitely have a thing for me. Minding my own business in a park, and being the only one not to swat at them, what happens? Of course, the bugger stings my ear. Lying comfortably in my bed, off in wonderland, then rolling over; where does my arm land? On top of an angry wasp, of course (incidentally, one of the few reliable ways of waking me up if I don't take my meds). Trying to wave one off, where does it seek refuge? In my shirt, of course. Try to move around one hovering and not disturb it, what does it do? Start following me, obviously. Open my mouth in the wrong place? You get the idea...

quote:

I am not sure what it would take to get crickets to consent, if that is what one is bent on, but where there is a will; there is a way.


Consenting to do one thing, then getting killed, is kind of setting up a trap. I can't say I have a well-thought-out ethical basis for the following statement, but I think there's probably something inherently more disturbing about tricking the crickets into a deathtrap for your amusement than just killing them outright.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to charmdpetKeira)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:25:50 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

This is perhaps the strangest thread of all time on CM, and that is sayin something... so I will play along...


Ceded.

Blame him, though, not me. I just made the cricket comment, he's the one who made a thread about it

quote:

While a cricket is as intrinsically as valuable in the universe as I am, I do not think I need  consent from the cricket to take its life. I eat animals, none of which consented to be eaten. I feel no moral objection to this.


A point in this regard is that you can argue that part of the ethical basis for consent is that what you are doing is following someone else's criterion for how they may be treated. Kind of like the complement to the golden rule of "do not do unto others what you would not have them do unto you", to keep it short.

In that sense, carnivores, at least, have consented to be eaten, as they also eat animals to survive. In my view, plants are life too, so the argument can be extended to herbivores, who eat non-animal life to survive.

In essence, there's a distinction between self-preservation, which is universally present as accepted in nature (and in all human cultures I know of), and killing for other reasons.

quote:

I will say that there is something extremely creepy about killing other lifeforms for a kink. Personally it squicks me. Killing things in happenstance is one thing, but the wanton destruction of life just to get off is a little odd in my book.


I'd agree with that assessment. I've got ethical objections about it, as well, but I also have the squick-response as a seperate deal. Oddly, that one doesn't trigger if there is consent involved, it seems, but I have had no reason or opportunity to probe that one in depth, which may be just as well.

quote:

I do not know if we could say they are more moral or not, but all in all I would say that most of animal kind do not take pleasure to kill just to kill. Most do not kill unless hungry.


It's hard to say, really. Cats appear to take great pleasure in tormenting little animals.

Of course, cats in the wild also have a very low success rate at catching food, so it could just be something they've developed as a means of dealing with that, or a way to keep their instincts sharp.

Apes are a bit more like humans in this regard. They sometimes tear the limbs of the children of other apes as part of inter-tribe warfare, without actually killing them outright by more effective means; it would appear to be genuine intent to harm or cause terror.

quote:

Most do not kill within their own species for the most part either... so all in all I have to say that most animals are more ethical than many people...


True. Not many species kill their own intentionally as individuals. Some end up doing so during contests, or in territorial warfare, but that's slightly different. Arguably a human trait, though, in the sense of equally human.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:33:49 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CitizenCane

Clearly I'm missing something, because a bucket of polonium can't consent to anything either.


Neither is the bucket of polonium alive. And even if you were to put life and the lack of life on equal footing, then the polonium wouldn't be doing anything it isn't usually doing, namely giving off insane amounts of heat and radiation. If you've seen a vagina that can contract with sufficient strength to deform polonium, please get back to me on that, so I can talk to the rest of the woman and find out how it got that way.

quote:

However, there is no 'ultimate' arbiter of consequences, and in a practical sense we can only be responsible for those that we can reasonably foresee.  I happen to embrace strongly a policy of 'benevolence' toward others in general, but I can't offer any absolute proof that this is a superior policy to any other, because I can't absolutely define any measure of superiority.


This stance, called moral relativism, is one I also subscribe to. We make our own values.

Like yours, mine include an attempt at benevolence whenever dealing with someone that is incapable of making a decision about my actions, whether that is a dog or a child. (No, that is not a kink reference.)

quote:

I'm not convinced that a cricket is capable of being distressed, or has any analogs to human emotion, so putting a cricket in a vagina doesn't strike me as any kind of ethical issue.


The issue in question was, as got lost in the context, that the cricket will be harmed by it.

We're talking a bucketload of crickets in a confined space, and in the original context it was inside someone who might have an orgasm from it, causing contractions that will crush a large number of them. Either way, I'm not sure if a cricket could breathe in there.

If you cajole a cricket into someone's vagina, leave it with a way out, and make sure it doesn't get killed, I won't see anything wrong with that. I may, however, comment that it seems darned odd to me, but that is entirely beside the point of the thread. ~g~

quote:

Putting a dog in a blender, however, does, because a dog is capable of feeling distress, pain, terror and so on in ways clearly similar to our own.


Indeed. Same thing for the Jews. Hence my comparison. The publications read the same.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to CitizenCane)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:36:18 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

No one truly believes that it's immoral to do anything to other living beings without their consent.  Some people might say something along those lines, but that only shows how badly they've failed to think the issue through.


Noah appears not to have thought it through.

If there is any way in which you think that I haven't thought my position, through, however, please feel free to point it out, and I'll elaborate if there's something I forgot to explain, or rethink my views otherwise. I assure you that I've thought it through in great detail over the 5-6 years I spent considering it.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:37:27 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Apes are a bit more like humans in this regard. They sometimes tear the limbs of the children of other apes as part of inter-tribe warfare, without actually killing them outright by more effective means; it would appear to be genuine intent to harm or cause terror.



I have only heard of one instance of "inter tribe warfare" among apes.. if one can call them "tribes" (seems an anthropomorphization to me). It was theorized that the humans in the vicinity caused this "war" by feeding the chimps in the area... so it may have been human induced and for the resource of the food that the humans had brought into the area if I remember this lecture from my class correctly.

quote:

True. Not many species kill their own intentionally as individuals. Some end up doing so during contests, or in territorial warfare, but that's slightly different. Arguably a human trait, though, in the sense of equally human.




Even during mating season and rut the males of different species that are competing for females rarely kill each other, the entire idea is to obtain dominance, not to kill the competition.

Human beings are just another type of animal in my mind, a very complex animal, but an animal nonetheless. This is why when people state we should not use animals as food because it is immoral I tend to find that without merit because we are no better than any other omnivore, and to argue otherwise is to seperate man from nature. Most of our problems are from this idealized view of ourselves as superior instead a part of the natural world (in my opinion).

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:38:24 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
I already did, Aswad.  If you've ever brushed your teeth, you've killed all kinds of organisms without their consent.

Thinking about something for 5-6 years is not the same thing as thinking something through.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

No one truly believes that it's immoral to do anything to other living beings without their consent.  Some people might say something along those lines, but that only shows how badly they've failed to think the issue through.


Noah appears not to have thought it through.

If there is any way in which you think that I haven't thought my position, through, however, please feel free to point it out, and I'll elaborate if there's something I forgot to explain, or rethink my views otherwise. I assure you that I've thought it through in great detail over the 5-6 years I spent considering it.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:39:54 PM   
stella40


Posts: 417
Joined: 1/11/2006
From: London, UK
Status: offline
Hmm. This is what I think.

I generally divide behaviour into two types - instinctive and premeditated. Consent for me applies mainly to the latter.

However consent requires various thought processes - the ability to make a choice, the ability to follow a cause effect pattern of thought, the ability to assess implications, and the ability to apply a set of moral values and use judgement to justify one's decision.

I am part of the animal kingdom. I am a human being, homo sapiens, the most successful of the insect-eating, omnivorous apes which has managed to survive and evolve through its ability to adapt to different circumstances. I am a social animal, part of a hierarchy which forms part of my society and through which I play my biological role. Through having gone through one of the longest childhood periods in the animal kingdom I have been socialized and conditioned to be able to give consent or withhold consent through using all the above thought processes.

I do not subscribe to the opinion that humans are unable to live outside buildings. Homeless people tend to adapt fairly well to living in open spaces and some are able to do so for years.

Other animals are also able to reason and follow thought processes by which they can give consent or not. However they are not humans and even when they are social animals their development, socialization and even structure of moral thinking is something quite different from humans.

Some animals share a symbiotic relationship with humans - dogs, cats and horses, as a few examples. They are conditioned to live with humans as part of the same social structure, and thus it is possible for such an animal to be able to interact with humans and consent or refuse to consent on terms similar to humans.

The clearest example of this is a cat. An example of such behaviour is when a human wishes to show affection for the cat by stroking it. The cat uses discrimination, and will not usually allow indiscriminate stroking or touching of its body by any human. The cat will normally only allow certain humans to stroke it, and would prefer to be stroked in a particular way. The cat usually is closest to a human when it comes to consenting to living with one.

But just because a cat is able to discriminate and give or withhold consent like a human, it doesn't mean it does it in human terms or that it's a two way street. Have you ever tried to do something with a cat against its consent? Cats are perhaps the best equipped animal around for preventing any non-consensual behaviour. They are intelligent, extremely perceptive, they have sharp claws, sharp teeth and are quite good contortionists. If you have any doubts as to whether a cat is able to withhold consent or not try giving the cat a bath or teaching it to swim.

Animals, through not being socialized or conditioned like humans, view consent completely differently to the way we do.

I give you another example. Or a series of examples. I am an animal lover. I love animals. But my feelings are not always reciprocated.. and I have a tendency to be bitten by animals. Usually I have not threatened the animal in any way, most often there hasn't been any interaction whatsoever, but I have been bitten.

I have been bitten by dogs, cats, a couple of rabbits, a snake, a horse, a cow, a pig, mosquitos, horse flies, and ants. Only on a couple of occasions have I done something which has caused an animal to react in this manner, I put my hand too close to a viper nest whilst picking blackberries, I fed a horse in the wrong manner but on most occasions it has been unprovoked and premeditated. Not all animals I come into contact with bite me, but there is a strong tendency. I guess it's perhaps one of my destinies in life, or Karma, to be bitten by animals.

I have even had a dog I've never seen before see me, jump over a fence, run 200 yards down a street and bite me before running off. On no occasion did any animal seek my consent before biting me. It just came up to me, bit me and ran away. I used to work as an English language tutor visiting my students in their homes. On a couple of occasions I have had to resign from teaching them because I have been bitten by either a cat or a dog. On one occasion I was systematically attacked by a cat over three months on each weekly visit. I even tried protective clothing. I have even had to give up a relationship with someone because the dog would bite me on the bottom whenever I got too close or intimate with this person.

But was this consent or expressing that consent was not given? Did the cat not want its owner to learn English for some reason? Or the dog decide I was an unsuitable partner?

I have also been sexually assaulted by a Great Dane. Did it seek my consent? No it didn't. It just jumped on me and started well.... I guess you can all use your imagination. It happened whilst I was cleaning someone's house. One minute I was vacuuming a carpet, the next I had my face in the sofa with a big dog on top of me.

However I have managed to stop dogs biting me. If ever I think a dog is about to bite me I will growl at it, using a very low pitched growl. I know that I shouldn't bark at the dog in such a situation as it might upset the dog, but by baring my teeth and growling I am showing the dog that I do not consent to being bitten. This usually works.

Therefore I conclude that while animals as well as us understand consent they tend to have a different interpretation of the meaning of consent and when they need to seek consent because they have not been conditioned or socialized as humans.

_____________________________

I try to take one day at a time, but several days come and attack me at once. (Jennifer Unlimited)

If you can't be a good example then you'll just have to be a horrible warning.


(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:41:45 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I have only heard of one instance of "inter tribe warfare" among apes.. if one can call them "tribes" (seems an anthropomorphization to me). It was theorized that the humans in the vicinity caused this "war" by feeding the chimps in the area... so it may have been human induced and for the resource of the food that the humans had brought into the area if I remember this lecture from my class correctly.


My sociobiology or whatever that field is called is rusty, so I may be wrong.

Not sure why you'd consider it anthropomorphization, though. "Community" would perhaps be better? Either way, a social unit can be called by whatever name. It's the same thing as a group of humans living under the same conditions, without the "benefit" of being raised in a modern society.

quote:

Even during mating season and rut the males of different species that are competing for females rarely kill each other, the entire idea is to obtain dominance, not to kill the competition.


I know. I tried to point out that it happens, not that it's the norm, because it isn't, at least not for the species I'm familiar with.

quote:

Most of our problems are from this idealized view of ourselves as superior instead a part of the natural world (in my opinion).


~nod~

That's part of why I took issue with calling what I said anthropomorphization.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/3/2007 11:43:08 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

I already did, Aswad.  If you've ever brushed your teeth, you've killed all kinds of organisms without their consent.


Reread my post. Specifically the point about self-preservation, and extended implications of such.

quote:

Thinking about something for 5-6 years is not the same thing as thinking something through.


Clearly not. Let's rephrase it: I've been thinking it through for 5-6 years.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/4/2007 12:24:35 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stella40

I generally divide behaviour into two types - instinctive and premeditated. Consent for me applies mainly to the latter.


Pretty much. Close enough for this discussion, at least.

quote:

I am part of the animal kingdom. I am a human being, homo sapiens, the most successful of the insect-eating, omnivorous apes which has managed to survive and evolve through its ability to adapt to different circumstances.


Human beings have no ability to adapt beyond the mental level. And I'd argue that the distinction of "most successful" goes to the cockroach before it goes to humans. We aren't very successful by the standards of biology, and we don't adapt ourselves, we change our environment to suit our needs.

quote:

I do not subscribe to the opinion that humans are unable to live outside buildings. Homeless people tend to adapt fairly well to living in open spaces and some are able to do so for years.


Put a homeless person in the wilderness with no clothes and no tools, and see how well they fare. Unless the climate is very favorable, they will usually die from exposure. I can cede that it may even work for a few persons, however, but humans as a species cannot live without shelter and/or tools. The arguments against anarcho-primitivism apply well to this bit.

quote:

Other animals are also able to reason and follow thought processes by which they can give consent or not. However they are not humans and even when they are social animals their development, socialization and even structure of moral thinking is something quite different from humans.


Definitely. Which is why I'm fine with someone putting honey on their whatever and having someone eat that, or otherwise act in accord with the consent they are capable of giving. I'm not okay with forcing them to act contrary to their consent for other reasons than their best interests, however.

quote:

Some animals share a symbiotic relationship with humans - dogs, cats and horses, as a few examples. They are conditioned to live with humans as part of the same social structure, and thus it is possible for such an animal to be able to interact with humans and consent or refuse to consent on terms similar to humans.


~nod~

As the guy who owned the farm where Mr. Hands was killed said, "If the horse doesn't want to do something, he isn't doing it. And he's got about a thousand pounds of muscle and sharp hooves to back that up with."

Not that I'm advocating the practice, just making the comparison / example, with regard to ways in which an animal can indicate the presence or absence of consent by their own standards.

quote:

But just because a cat is able to discriminate and give or withhold consent like a human, it doesn't mean it does it in human terms or that it's a two way street. Have you ever tried to do something with a cat against its consent?


Taking it to the vet would count.

quote:

Cats are perhaps the best equipped animal around for preventing any non-consensual behaviour. They are intelligent, extremely perceptive, they have sharp claws, sharp teeth and are quite good contortionists. If you have any doubts as to whether a cat is able to withhold consent or not try giving the cat a bath or teaching it to swim.


Some cats actually like bathing and/or swimming. And if they have a close enough relationship with you, many of them will put up with being washed, if you don't take too much time doing it, and make sure to reward them for their patience. But that's kind of off topic, except for the part about putting up with it if they are close enough to you.

I've tried giving a cat antibiotics that emphatically did not consent to that.

Suffice to say that the cat got its antibiotics, and I got 4-6 inch (10-15cm) scratches along my legs, hips, lower torso and lower arm. It had just arrived from an animal shelter, however, so I'm not faulting it in any way. It's not a good way to start building trust, forcing it to eat, but it wouldn't have made it otherwise. Next time, I was more careful.

That same cat would stay inside the house while the windows and doors were open, however, and spent endless hours curled up in our laps, following us around wherever we went in the house. It learned a few different meows that sounded vaguely like words and were used as such, one of which corresponded to "food", two of which corresponded to calling our names (and did indeed have a similar quality in terms of timing, pitch and such, to the extent that cat vocal chords can emulate the vowels in the names). I'm pretty sure it was happy about things in the long run; we didn't have any trouble with future rounds of antibiotics or whatever.

Animals of sufficient intelligence do have an idea of cause and effect, so if you build trust, and they get a sense that your actions, even the ones they don't like, are good for them, then they'll put up with your minstrations in much the same way as a kitten does with the mother cat.

quote:

Animals, through not being socialized or conditioned like humans, view consent completely differently to the way we do.


Actually, most people I've met deal with consent in the same way as animals, unless they stop to think about it explicitly. This talking about vanillas; the BDSM crowd is usually more explicit about it from the get-go.

quote:

I give you another example. Or a series of examples. I am an animal lover. I love animals. But my feelings are not always reciprocated.. and I have a tendency to be bitten by animals. Usually I have not threatened the animal in any way, most often there hasn't been any interaction whatsoever, but I have been bitten.


Odd. Could be body language. I only get that problem with mosquitoes, wasps and such, unless you count play-biting puppies (which I play with at their own level, unless their owners disapprove of me doing so; I've never had any problem getting them to understand that such isn't okay with others). I've dealt with snakes, cats, dogs (including hostile ones), and even a pair of wolves, with no biting.

I've also dealt with a horse that had been in an accident. It was bleeding severely from one of its legs, where it had been cut to the bone. Me and two women a bit younger than me were dealing with it. We cut it loose from its harness, got the harness free so it could stand up, applied compresses, and helped it get to a safer place (this was by the side of a road in a sharp turn). When the vet took a long time in arriving, we had to use a light tourniquet. Despite being clearly hurt, it wasn't afraid of what we were doing, and it stayed calm throughout everything up until the police arrived. It was a bit afraid of them, so we got them to stay back a bit, and things worked out. They eventually saved it in surgery, as I recall.

quote:

I have been bitten by dogs, cats, a couple of rabbits, a snake, a horse, a cow, a pig, mosquitos, horse flies, and ants. Only on a couple of occasions have I done something which has caused an animal to react in this manner, I put my hand too close to a viper nest whilst picking blackberries, I fed a horse in the wrong manner but on most occasions it has been unprovoked and premeditated. Not all animals I come into contact with bite me, but there is a strong tendency. I guess it's perhaps one of my destinies in life, or Karma, to be bitten by animals.


Ouch. My sympathies.

quote:

I have even had a dog I've never seen before see me, jump over a fence, run 200 yards down a street and bite me before running off.


Smart move: kick it in the side, but not with the tip of the foot. That gets them to back off. If they go for the neck or face, offer your arm instead; that gives you a good indication of how hard it was going to bite. If it bites lightly, kick it. If it bites hard, or the light kick doesn't work, then it's really attacking, and a blow to the spinal vertebrae close to the skull will (AFAIK) be the most painless way to kill it.

quote:

On no occasion did any animal seek my consent before biting me. It just came up to me, bit me and ran away.


Funny. My experiences along those lines have been exclusively with humans. Perhaps we were both incarnated as the wrong species?

quote:

On one occasion I was systematically attacked by a cat over three months on each weekly visit. I even tried protective clothing.


Cats are pretty intelligent, and they can carry grudges. Siamese were bred to be guards at one point. I'd not care to mess with a siamese. Brings to mind the one about the thief who broke into a house, and all they could find was a bloody trail after him, and the cat sitting on the front porch, contentedly licking blood off its paws. All he had seen was a pale shadow, then all hell broke loose; they found him at the ER, getting stitched.

quote:

I have even had to give up a relationship with someone because the dog would bite me on the bottom whenever I got too close or intimate with this person.


You have to earn a pet's trust. Think of it as entering into a poly relationship.

quote:

But was this consent or expressing that consent was not given? Did the cat not want its owner to learn English for some reason? Or the dog decide I was an unsuitable partner?


It may have been an expression that you were not welcome in their personal space, but it's hard to tell. You could just have the animal-kingdom body language that says "kick me", for all I know. ~lol~

quote:

I have also been sexually assaulted by a Great Dane. Did it seek my consent? No it didn't. It just jumped on me and started well.... I guess you can all use your imagination. It happened whilst I was cleaning someone's house. One minute I was vacuuming a carpet, the next I had my face in the sofa with a big dog on top of me.


Dogs and horses are sluts, to borrow a quote from someone.

quote:

However I have managed to stop dogs biting me. If ever I think a dog is about to bite me I will growl at it, using a very low pitched growl. I know that I shouldn't bark at the dog in such a situation as it might upset the dog, but by baring my teeth and growling I am showing the dog that I do not consent to being bitten. This usually works.


Indeed. Personally, I don't growl. I just stare them down until they place nice, then I pet them. That doesn't work for everyone, though. A friend of mine tried to copy it, and that just ended up with me having to tackle the poor dog. Guess there's a bit of animal in my soul.

quote:

Therefore I conclude that while animals as well as us understand consent they tend to have a different interpretation of the meaning of consent and when they need to seek consent because they have not been conditioned or socialized as humans.


Indeed. Humans have the capacity to translate and interpret between these paradigms if they care to learn how, however. And so they should, IMO. Especially if involving them in anything kinky.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to stella40)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/4/2007 2:30:44 AM   
charmdpetKeira


Posts: 916
Joined: 6/2/2007
Status: offline
quote:

~Aswad looks down at his own dangly bits~

No, that can't be the reason
.

*watches Aswad in confusion* Sure.. There’s an exception to every rule. ;)

quote:

Indeed. Ants are liable to cooperate, and there are a lot of ways you could get ants to consent (to their standard) to stuff that would qualify as kinky. Where it gets iffy, is when you do something they didn't consent to, and can't back away from, like stepping on them (google crush fetish if you like) or putting them somewhere they can't get back out of (you pick a spot) or putting them somewhere they'll be crushed from the rest of what is going on.

I see what you’re saying, and while I personally, have not gone on an intentional mass murder spree of insects, of any kind; it is unlikely I will be going out of my way, in great lengths, to avoid it either; tends to cause accidents.

quote:

~lol~

Sorry for laughing at your misfortune.

 
Its ok, I can laugh about it now. *f’in ant!!!*

quote:

I haven't had any trouble with ants that I can recall, but wasps definitely have a thing for me. Minding my own business in a park, and being the only one not to swat at them, what happens? Of course, the bugger stings my ear. Lying comfortably in my bed, off in wonderland, then rolling over; where does my arm land? On top of an angry wasp, of course (incidentally, one of the few reliable ways of waking me up if I don't take my meds). Trying to wave one off, where does it seek refuge? In my shirt, of course. Try to move around one hovering and not disturb it, what does it do? Start following me, obviously. Open my mouth in the wrong place? You get the idea...

Yes, it is obvious, I would not be safe hanging out with you … I could get stung. :b

quote:

Consenting to do one thing, then getting killed, is kind of setting up a trap.

Hmmm… is it? I can see if I were leading them to a pool of gas and knew it would kill them, but in the case of unforeseen circumstance; is it still a trap?
 
quote:

I can't say I have a well-thought-out ethical basis for the following statement, but I think there's probably something inherently more disturbing about tricking the crickets into a deathtrap for your amusement than just killing them outright.

 
Do we know for sure that being inside a vagina will kill crickets? Don’t get me wrong; as I have always been told, having crotch crickets is a baaaaad thing.
 
One other reason I would not “play” with ants; if I remember correctly, they like to eat the flesh off of dead things; I’m betting they don’t really care if what they are eating is dead.
 
k

_____________________________

Life is tough, that does not mean it isn't fair.

There is no wrong choice, only consequence.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: creepy crawly consent - 6/4/2007 2:40:46 AM   
eyesopened


Posts: 2798
Joined: 6/12/2006
From: Tampa, FL
Status: offline
i live in a part of the country where the vast majority of insects regard me as nothing more than yet another food source and they inflict pain and poison upon me without my consent on a regular basis.  The insects do not appear to bury their dead but rather seen their fallen comrades as yet another food source.  Human beings tend to think that eating the brain of one's sexual partner during the act of coitus as being rather nasty but to the praying mantis it's just business as usual. It is that example that allows me to believe i really can't impose human ethics and moral behavior to the insect world.  It is enough to deal with other humans. 

_____________________________

Proudly owned by InkedMaster. He is the one i obey, serve, honor and love.

No one is honored for what they've received. Honor is the reward for what has been given.

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: creepy crawly consent Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109